Rhetorical Analysis Of Pearl Harbor Address To The Nation

280 Words1 Page

I strongly believe that a motivational speech presented by someone powerful, for who truly believes in what they are preaching can change people's perspectives. They can inspire an audience to believe and be on their side. It is important to get the audience's full attention and make it easy for them to understand what they are trying to preach about. A great speech in not spoke in a monotone voice setting and there is an emphasis on the words and phrases being presented. You would want to make sure the words stick into people's brains and they can think and grasp on what you are trying to get across. It is important to set the right tone, the usage of a right word being used, and talk about nationwide conflicts that may be causing a huge impact in the …show more content…

A speech that comes in mind is, "Pearl Harbor Address to the Nation" presented by Franklin Delano Roosevelt. This speech was presented after the attack of Pearl Harbor on, December 7th, 1941. Mr. Roosevelt addressed to the citizens that they needed to support the war effect on the terrifying bombing of Pearl Harbor in Hawaii. With this being addressed, I strongly agree when Hillary stated, "We much move beyond rhetoric." As a nation, we have shown we can before and I personally agree we can again if more problems keep reoccurring. A speech does not have to impact everyone listening but hopefully gets enough ears engaged to do something about the problem. If a few people participate on the problem, eventually more and more will and the problem will be resolved and changes will be made back to

Open Document