Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Experiences with public speaking
Rhetorical analysis words
A proposal for rhetorical analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In response to the many shootings that have transpired, Barack Obama has been discussing how to prevent them. He claims that signing an action will protect the people from gun violence. Furthermore, he believes that this action will hinder guns from getting into the hands of the men, women, and children that abuse them. In his speech, “Remarks on Signing 23 Executive Actions to Reduce Gun Violence”, Barack Obama applies pathos, logos, and biased language to lure the audience into feeling that the 23 actions are deemed necessary in order to protect those they love.
During Obama's speech, he uses pathos to trigger emotion within the audience. His use of adolescent letters causes parents to feel the need to protect their children. Through the use of their letters, he highlights the idea of protection, which is a prominent role as a parent. One of the letters states, “I’m scared for others. I have four brothers and sisters and I know I would not be able to bear the thought of losing any of them” (Julia). In other words, she
…show more content…
Biased language is twisting and manipulating and Obama uses it in his speech. For example, Obama calls gun violence an “epidemic”. He argues that gun violence is a huge problem and that it is spreading like the flu. To exaggerate the problem and manipulate the minds of the audience, Obama uses the words “military-style assault weapons” to describe the weapons even if they are simple guns. Through doing this, he instills fear within the audience. His use of biased language elaborates on the fact that not all guns in shootings are military style guns. This strategy is effective if someone is not paying close attention to the words that are being read or spoken. By using biased languaging, he is futhering his point that the 23 actions are going to prevent the incedents like the sandy hook shooting and Newtown
In his article “Gun debate? What gun debate?” Mark O 'Mara discuses the controversial issue of gun control. O’Mara takes the tragic school shooting in Oregon as an opportunity to voice his opinion on the debate of guns. He clearly states his position and explains that gun violence has increased enormously because of the lack of command by the government and support from the public to speak out against it. O’Mara claims the issue is no longer a debate because it is so evident that guns have become a significant problem in this country and therefore actions must be taken to control and govern gun laws. In his article he attempts to raise awareness to the severity of the issue and tries to persuade his readers to take a stance against gun violence
Guns have possessed the spotlight of almost every news station. From the latest tragedy of a shooting killing innocent men, women and children to the arguments centering around if our gun laws possess strict enough qualities to keep our country safe. Charles C. W. Cooke, the author of “Gun-Control Dishonesty”, spreads his conservative view on the topic by ripping away any hope for a brighter day. Cooke’s main idea states that if nothing has happened to make gun law more strict even after the lives of innocent children were mercilessly ripped away from their young bodies than nothing should or could ever change. On the other hand, Adam Gopnik wrote his article, “Shooting”, uses a more liberal approach and inspires his audience to act upon the much needed change in our society
Although the families of those affected and the American people watching at home believed in the security of our Nation during the Sandy Hook school shooting, we as a Nation have not put in the recognition needed to see the restraint that has blinded us from noticing we aren’t doing enough for the safety of our children when it comes to gun violence; therefore, President Barack Obama wants the American people to see this as it is and to begin to resolve this issue, beginning with gun control policies.
Aroung the time of John F. Kennedy’s assassination, the controversial and widely argued issue of gun control sparked and set fire across America. In the past decade however, it has become one of the hottest topics in the nation. Due to many recent shootings, including the well known Sandy Hook Elementary school, Columbine High School, Aurora movie theater, and Virginia Tech, together totaling 87 deaths, many people are beginning to push for nationwide gun control. An article published in the Chicago Tribune by Illinois State Senator Jacqueline Collins, entitled “Gun Control is Long Overdue” voiced the opinion that in order for America to remain the land of the free, we must take action in the form of stricter gun laws. On the contrary, Kathleen Parker, a member of the Washington Post Writers Group whose articles have appeared in the Weekly Standard, Time, Town & Country, Cosmopolitan, and Fortune Small Business, gives a different opinion on the subject. Her article in The Oregonian “Gun Control Conversation Keeps Repeating” urges Americans to look at the cultural factors that create ...
As us Americans we are actually making the stereotype of we always carry guns around sound true to the rest of the world considering that, we are the “31% percent of all public mass shootings which at least four people are killed.” (TheWeek.com) But under a broader definition USA counted 346 mass shootings including shooting deaths of four or more victims in a 17- year period. The worst part about this information is this year we already have recorded 249 mass shootings in about 7 months close to the same amount USA counted over 17 years! This is a problem that must be solve for the safety in this country but also prevent more mass shooting from happening. “According to a Mother Jones study: Only 23 percent have been treated for mental illness.” ( Gallagher )
However, using appeals to anaphora, the repetition of certain pronouns all through the speech, Obama categorizes the victims specifically, and also the nation as a whole. The repetition of the pronoun “you’ve” categorizes the students, faculty, and administration of the Sandy Hook Elementary School. It is used to describe the members of the school community and commend their bravery. By singling them out, Obama appeals to those who the shooting has specifically affected. The repeated pronoun use of the word “we” transforms the President into a citizen of the nation as he includes himself in this phrase. By doing so, his words seem relatable and comforting, knowing that as citizens we experience hardship together. A certain type of personal reflection is also created at this time because tragedies like this can happen anywhere, “in a town full of good and decent people.” In this moment, Obama is not viewed solely as The President, rather an average citizen, forced to cope with tragedy
Is it believable for any gun to actually save one's life? The New York Times op-ed columnist, Nicholas Kristof, believes that the invention of the smart gun can better the safety of those around us. Kristof's wrote an editorial in the beginning of 2015 called "Smart Guns Save Lives. So Where Are They?" In this editorial, he states that younger children around the preschool age are killed more than police officers are killed by firearms yearly (Kristof). He utilized specific experts such as a gun expert, a public health expert, and different visuals to set the right tone for his argument. Kristof relies on ethos and also logos to convince his audiences of concerned
In 1982, a survey of male inmates from eleven different penitentiaries, stated that sixty-nine percent of the prisoners knew another criminal that had been scared off, wounded, or decided not to commit a crime because they thought the victim had a gun (Agresti and Smith). As The United States heads to the end of 2013, current gun control debates are striking the nation, leaving everyone to develop their own positions on which side of the debate they want to be on. Gun control is defined as efforts to regulate or control sales of guns; however, most of what we hear from other people is that Obama wants to take away every gun in the nation. That’s not entirely true. Obama’s proposal to Congress is a law that would increase background check protocols, ban assault weapons, high-capacity ammunition, and armor-piercing bullets. The proposal also provides more funding for additional police officers on the streets, first response training, mental health programs, and school emergency plans.
As firearm technology evolves, weapons become more efficient. These improvements come from the increasing ammo capacity, rate of fire, accuracy, and overall user friendliness. According to everytownresearch.org, roughly 91 Americans are killed each day as a result of gun violence. Currently, the murder rate of the U.S. is 25 times more than the average of other countries. The United States has also endured various mass shootings. Incidents such as the Columbine High School massacre and the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting have inspired the awareness of gun control. Although the government has been debating ways to reduce this violence, no major reforms have been developed. In response to these rates, President Obama delivered the “Address
By appealing to several different views, Wheeler is able to grab every reader’s attention. Using schools as his focus point grabs the reader’s attention on a personal level. A school is a place where your children, your friends, your spouses all could be, and we still aren’t motivated to change our gun control laws. Tragic events do not have to happen like those that occurred at Virginia Tech, The Jewish Day care in Los Angeles, and Pearl High School. Wheeler believes concealed carry should be allowed in every school. Let’s make the students and teachers of these schools and colleges their own heroes. Wheeler says we must embrace all of the varied disciplines contributing to preparedness and response. We must become more willing to be guided and informed of empirical finding. School officials base policies on irrational fears. Wheeler states, “What is actually worse, the fear of what we think might happen, or the massacres that actually did occur?” Wheelers essay is very well thought out and uses fear, credibility, and factual evidence to support his beliefs. My belief is we should allow teachers and students to have guns at schools, as long as they have gone through training to do
Guns and violence have some long lasting effects on not only the crime rate, but the rights that people have to own guns themselves. Even though the violence is a factor in why many believe that guns should be banned, guns should be allowed and not banned because they should be allowed because of the laws and the rights of citizens allow them there rights. The ethics and laws that occur with the current and enduring debates are another meaningful point. As Supreme Court Cases rage on about how a cities ban on handguns could break amendments, this is how the topic has gained from it (Hoxie 474). As crime statistics begin to rise there are many reasons that they need to work on the juvenile justice system (Collier 478). The other topic of the age could become a factor is another point that many think needs to be changed, as a 13 year old child could commit murder, they would not be sentenced as severely as an adult (Cohen 481). The ethic and laws play a huge effect on guns and violence because of the effects it has on crime, and the citizens themselves play a huge role on the society that they live in.
Mass shootings in the United States have unfortunately become a disconcerting drift that appears to be on the rise. There have been numerous shootings in open places obtaining media coverage and giving the recognition that they are getting to be the modern typical. Social media has played a big role in mass shootings, from recognizing the problem and making it seem normal to society. There are so many questions as to why these horrific acts happen, but many want the violence to be put to a stop. Mass shootings has various views which makes it challenging to discover a viable solution.
In the days and weeks following the shooting, the nation’s attention was attracted to Newtown, Connecticut. Media from all over the country stormed the town looking and digging for details about the events and the victims. The town received more than eight million dollars that came to the town in form of donations. (Aviv 24-29). There was also 50,000 stuffed animals were sent to the town for the memorials of the fallen: “In the weeks after the shooting, fifty thousand stuffed animals were sent to Newtown, a community of twenty-seven thousand” (Aviv 24-29). Four days after the attack, Obama visited Newtown and delivered a very heartfelt speech discussing the topic of gun safety in the country to the crowd. He addressed the community at a prayer vigil on December 16, 2012 in the Sandy Hook High School. Obama hit on the key point that the nation should be doing all that they can to protect the children when he asked, “Can we honestly say that we’re doing enough to keep our children, all of them, safe from harm?” (Obama 34). He also addressed that a single law or set of laws could not completely rid of the country of this problem when he stated, “No single law, no set of laws can eliminate evil from the world or prevent every senseless act in our society, but that can’t be an excuse for inaction. Surely we can do better than this” (Obama 35). Obama urged the crowd that these tragedies need to end when he said, “We can’t tolerate this anymore. These tragedies must end. And to end them, we must change”
In America, the issue of gun violence is often seen on the news and in articles online and in print. Many people believe that gun laws are fair and require no change while others believe that stricter gun laws will lower the overall rates of gun violence in America. Dan Gross is the president of the Brady Campaign and is a gun control activist. In February of 2016, Gross appeared at a TED Talks conference and gave a presentation on gun control and the need for change in order to lower gun violence overall. The purpose of his talk was to inform people on the statistics of gun violence in America and to engage people and motivate them to join the gun control movement. Through this, Gross explained that he believed change could be brought about and gun violence in America could decrease by half. In his video, Dan Gross expresses a reasonable view about how gun violence in America can be lowered with active citizens protesting on the issue and does this through addressing it as a serious issue, arguing that change in America is possible, and offering remedies that could be seen as motivation for change.
There have been arguments regarding the gun control in the United States, where some people argue that laws on gun control should be enhanced, while others supported the idea that there should be no regulations governing gun control in the country. In recent years, gun violence has increased significantly in this world. People across the United States are facing an ever-growing problem of violence. With more people are affected on a regular basis, more problems arise as how people can live safely when guns are being used in increasing numbers. It is disgraceful to say that everyday, the public hear about some sort of gun violence affecting people. The use of rhetorical devices, such as pathos, ethos, historical allusion, experience, and logos support pro-gun control.