Newtown Interfaith Prayer Vigil Argument Analysis

848 Words2 Pages

Although the families of those affected and the American people watching at home believed in the security of our Nation during the Sandy Hook school shooting, we as a Nation have not put in the recognition needed to see the restraint that has blinded us from noticing we aren’t doing enough for the safety of our children when it comes to gun violence; therefore, President Barack Obama wants the American people to see this as it is and to begin to resolve this issue, beginning with gun control policies. Obama’s argument starts off very formal and informative. He begins his Newtown Interfaith Prayer Vigil by addressing what had happened that fateful day and acknowledging those who were courageous. He appeals to the audiences mournful emotions by first addressing the people of Newtown, “They lost their lives in a school that could have been any school; in a quiet town full of good and decent people that could be any town in America”. Here, he is not only creating a dramatic effect with the use of a semicolon, he also connects the people of Newtown to the Nation. With his use of connecting terms such as “any school” and “any town” he is including the people at home watching and bringing their attention to the fact that this really could have happened to anyone, they just hadn’t noticed. That dramatic pause also He then goes on to appeal to …show more content…

Similarly, President Obama uses pathos in this section. He uses pathos throughout his whole speech to create an emotional connection to his main goal; gun control. As a matter of fact, he begins this when he says, “God has called them all home.” Here, he’s talking about the children that were lost. He uses pathos to drive this home as he uses religion to address their deaths. The overall sentence does nothing but attack every parental instinct the American people have within their body. Obama’s use of “has called” makes the

Open Document