Rhetorical Analysis: Immigrant Health

809 Words2 Pages

4. To support her claim, Villavicencio speaks from experience. She explains to the reader that her own parents are immigrants from Ecuador and have been living in the states for 30 years. She says that as a child her father her grandfathers death from her. “…he did not want it to affect my mental health.” By the author adding this tidbit of information about herself in the article, she is showing the seriousness of which immigrants/undocumented people are affected mentally even by situations or events that may be considered small. This acts as contrast to the bigger picture and poses the question of, “What health wise happens when these people are faced with even bigger problems? Like trumps decision?” The author also uses research to support …show more content…

Kara Cornejo Villavicencio’s article about the turmoil of Trump’s DACA decision on immigrant health and the health of these individuals as undocumented peoples in the united states in general is overall, very effectively written. The author’s use of style and diction help to support her claim and use of rhetoric. Villavicencio, as the daughter of immigrants herself, places herself within the article and uses anecdotes from her own personal experiences from growing up with immigrant parents as an undocumented citizen in the us. The author also uses anecdotes like this to express to the reader how DACA has in fact been beneficial to her. “Thanks to DACA I was able to get a state ID, land my first paid office job and fly without fear for the first time…” by the author showing a plus side to DACA from personal experience, she is making a use of style to convey her point to the reader through pathos. Villavicencio also uses her knowledge from within the community to make several points surrounding her claim. She says, “…the stigma f mental illness has perpetuated a culture of silence….” The author knows this from being a part of such a broad culture where mental illness is frowned upon, uses this as an advantage to make a pathological appeal. Additionally, because her audience is able to sympathize with this information, it works very well. The author’s use of words or diction is another element that adds to the effectiveness of her article. By using words like, “scant”, “refrain”, “mitigate”, and “ails” to describe the conditions of immigrants mentally, physically, or socially, it makes the reader develop more of an understanding of the challenges immigrants have to face and effects of the president’s decision. The fact that the author uses these elements, make her article more personal for the reader. Instead of being an upfront article standing alone on academic, logical (or ethical) reasoning, the author chose to make the matter more personal for reader because

Open Document