Rhetorical Analysis Essay On Julius Caesar

644 Words2 Pages

Julius Caesar Essay In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, there are speeches between the characters Antony and Brutus about Caesar’s death. Antony present’s a stronger and more effective argument. This is because he uses his innocence and isn’t indirect within his argument. Also, he uses emotion and repetition that really increase the strength of his argument. Antony uses his innocence and does not try to come right out within the point of his argument. Antony says “I am here to bury Caesar, not to praise him” (III, ii, 75). This brain washes the crowd to get them to believe that he does not care about Caesar’s death, and that he is on Brutus’ side now. This just begins his speech and draws attention from the crowd. He also says, “He hath brought …show more content…

Antony says to the crowd, “You all did love him once, not without cause: what cause withholds you then, to mourn for him? O Judgement!” (III, ii, 103-105). He is pulling in the emotions that the crowd had, and even has for Caesar by making them question their faith. “My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar,, and I must pause till it comes back to me.” Antony says this by using his emotion once again by showing his honesty and loyalty to Caesar regardless of everything happening. He knew the right buttons to push from the crowd. When Antony says, “Yet Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man” (III, ii, lines 87 & 88) several times, this is where it really sinks into the crowd. By his use of repetition, it shows that he does not have to directly argue against, or attack Brutus. It allows the audience to understand what he actually means throughout his whole speech. This is that Brutus is in fact wrong, and makes everyone question, is Brutus even honorable? The side agreeing that Brutus holds the stronger speech could say that he says everything out of honor and shows his claim of Caesar being ambitious. As well, they could say that people even agreed with him. The truth is, he cannot use his “honor” as a reason for his belief, when it is in question. Also, he has no proof on why Caesar is “ambitious”, and he ended his speech with a verbal attack on the crowd

Open Document