Research Critique

844 Words2 Pages

Research Critique
Introduction
Ellis et al., (2014) published an article called “American Society of Clinical Oncology Perspective: Raising the Bar for Clinical Trials by Defining Clinically Meaningful Outcomes.” This publication focused on how to improve cancer clinical trials using a better technique than the traditional clinical characteristics and tumor histology. As a result, the authors conducted a thorough literature survey on the subject in order to gain insight on their topic. It is notable that the authors also used a theoretical framework to connect theories and concepts that are relevant to the research topic. This paper reviews Ellis et al., (2014) publication by focusing on the problem statement, study purpose, research question, …show more content…

Nonetheless, the technique frequently results in small incremental changes in the overall survival, which is likely to reflect the effects of agents with uncertain efficiency in a subsection of the population that is hard to identify. Furthermore, this technique calls for the use of a large sample size, which increase the costs of conducting clinical trials. However, the use of relevant biomarkers (genomic tests) produces considerable improvements in results because they have quickly transformed patient care for different cancer types. Thus, the authors intended to establish whether the use of relevant biomarkers result in the aforementioned improvement. The inquiry made by Ellis et al., (2014) is significant to the entire human population because it improves the specificity and sensitivity of the results in addition to using a small samples size for clinical …show more content…

The author further asserts that types of studies that could be relevant when conducting literature reviews include randomized control trials, quantitative studies, qualitative studies, and meta-analyses. It is also important for researchers to use current references to avoid using outdated studies and ideas. It is notable that Ellis et al., (2014) conducted their literature review using different types of studies. As an evidence of this, the authors used meta-analyses, quantitative studies, qualitative studies, and randomized control trials. It is also notable that the authors restricted their literature survey to current studies. This is supported by the fact that all the references used in the literature survey were published either in 2010 or later than 2010. It follows that all the arguments proposed by the authors are

More about Research Critique

Open Document