Exploring Descartes' Dream Argument: A Skeptical Perspective

1004 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Mind–body dualism rené descartes

Adeyemi Fatoye 101050106 PHIL 1301 B Skepticism in philosophical terms is the theory that certain knowledge is impossible. René Descartes’ first meditation surrounds the subject of concerning those things that can be called into doubt. In this meditation, he contemplates three main arguments. Can we trust our senses, the dream argument, and the evil genius argument? The strongest skeptical argument present in Descartes meditation is, do we know that we are not dreaming, otherwise known as the dream argument. This is true because of the supporting premises that Descartes states are that “There are no certain indicators by which we may clearly distinguish wakefulness from sleep”(Rene Descartes, 1641, p. 7). This statement from Descartes is true …show more content…

In addition, the subject itself is of interesting nature as it concerns a concept that is immense and the answer to the question is complex and overwhelming to our minds and the best we currently can do is provide assumptions in philosophical terms. The dream argument is a concept that discusses, in essence, our subconscious, something that is of great interest to us as it is something that we lack knowledge about even though it is defining part of us. And according to Aristotle, “All men by nature desire to know.” (Aristotle, 350 B.C.E, p. 1), something that we cannot deny is that humankind has continually advanced throughout the years. Examples range from, technology like computers or machinery like vehicles. We could also look at our non-material advances like teaching. We human thrive on advancement and are always looking to know more and become more educated. In essence, the reason why Descartes dream argument is so compelling is because it concerns the things that we have always been doubting and in this case, the discussion is about humankind's existence. And that subject is one of the most interesting things that humankind desires to know. It is on par with discussions of how we came to be and the origins of our kind. This is why Rene Descartes dream argument, beyond doubt, is the most compelling of his skeptical arguments compared to his sense argument, which in actuality is connected to the dream argument, and his evil demon argument, which is a sound argument but for it to be true or more compelling than his dream argument you would have to believe and prove the existence of demons which are supernatural beings. In addition, Descartes argument is supported by another philosopher by the name of Sextus Empiricus, who says the same objects

Show More
Related

  • The Reasons Of Descartes: The Dream Argument For Skepticism

    902 Words  | 2 Pages

    Just because the person is so engulfed in a dream that it is impossible for that individual to recognize disparities between these 2 experiences, these same person can nevertheless tell the difference once he or she has awakened. Moreover, a sensation as clear as pain cannot feel the same as the pain we feel when awaken, some argue. After all, Descartes premise is based on the idea that there is nothing in reality that a dream cannot replicate so vividly that we are unable to tell the difference. But he also said that dreams borrow, in a sense, some but not all things from reality so these may not be but somewhat plausible events made up by our

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Descartes Dream Argument

    1001 Words  | 3 Pages

    You stop to observe the goings on of your day, things that are mundane and nothing out of the ordinary. How can you prove that what you are seeing is not all but a dream? According to Descartes’ Dream Argument, it is impossible to tell with Cartesian, or absolute, certainty that any given experience is not a dream. While we may believe what we perceive to be true, it is not always wise to trust our senses, as they have tendencies to fail us. Because perception begins at the senses, if we cannot trust them to be accurate one hundred percent of the time, there is no way to tell if any given moment is dreamed or reality.

    Read More

  • Comparing Descartes' Meditations on First Philosophy and Plato's The Republic

    1499 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Meditations, Descartes brings doubt to everything he believes because it is human nature to believe that which is false. He states that most of what he believes comes from the senses and that a lot of times those senses can be deceived. His conclusion of doubting everything is based on his example of a basket of apples. It goes as follows; you have a basket of apples but you fear that some apples have gone bad and you don't want them to rot the others, so you throw all the apples out of the basket. Now that the basket is empty you examine each apple carefully and return the good apples to the basket. This is what he does with his beliefs, he follows and keeps only those beliefs of which he is sure of. Our beliefs as a whole must be discarded and then each individual belief must be looked at carefully before we can accept it. We must only accept those beliefs we feel are good.

    Read More

  • Meditation By Rene Descartes

    1373 Words  | 3 Pages

    Rene Descartes’ greatest work, Meditations on First Philosophy, attempts to build the base of knowledge through a skeptical point of view. In the First Meditation, Descartes argues that his knowledge has been built on reason and his senses, yet how does he know that those concepts are not deceiving him? He begins to doubt that his body exists, and compares himself to an insane person. What if he is delusional about his social ranking, or confused about the color of his clothes, or even unaware of the material that his head is made of? This is all because the senses are deceiving, even in our dreams we experience realistic visions and feelings. Finally, Descartes comes to the conclusion that everything must be doubted, and begins to build his

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Descartes First Meditation

    550 Words  | 2 Pages

    Descartes’ dream arguement that he engages in within the ‘First Meditation’ is very complex and tends to have readers feeling skeptical if they are truly awake and no whats going on in the world around them, or if they are actually just dreaming. His arguementcan be both easy to understand as well as breaking down claims to know certain things going on around the world. Descartes describes how people believing they are awake and not dreaming right now may be shaken and wary. At first glance, it came to my perspective that Descartes is delusional to believe that one might believe that they are dreaming and are not awake. I believe this because when one wakes up in the morning they are awake and no longer dreaming, when they open their eyes they see the world and they begin to once again exsist within the world, therefore to be dreaming is not certain and therefore would not make sense to a regualr person. Descartes highlights in his defense the lack of insight a person has in the condition when dreaming, while not awake. In “First Meditation”, Descartes states:

    Read More

  • The Dream Argument by Rene Descartes

    1011 Words  | 3 Pages

    ... dream argument. When the creator of the argument is not 100 percent behind it, it is very difficult to get behind it yourself. Even with the farfetched ideas, contradictions and inconsistencies of Rene Descartes’s dream argument it is still a very interesting outlook at the topic that has not been seen from Descartes angle from anyone before. However, due to of all these negative attributes that are attached to Descartes’s Dream Argument cause it to fail to create any claim.

    Read More

  • Descartes Skeptical Argument In Meditation

    823 Words  | 2 Pages

    Meditation tests are used to address the issues raised by the skeptical argument that rely on the dream argument and evil demand argument. For example, the former raises the concern of empirical beliefs being untrue when dreamt. Not every empirical belief is untrue when people dream. Moreover, the evil argument states that what one believes in works is the end of argument in meditation. This should not be the case because what one believes in might not be true, hence leading to deception of the reality of the matter. To avoid the deception by the skeptical argument, Descartes introduced meditation tests to address these issues. In the psychology of belief, evidence and other things incline people to do something. Decisions are made depending on what is believed in, evidence and the surrounding environment. It must not be logical in order to have conclusive argument in meditation. Evil demand has a compulsory belief in doubt. This means that there is nothing without an element of doubt in it. This is an odd skeptical argument, but according to some concept, if what is believed in does not match the case, then the belief is false. Similarly, it states that if what is believed in matches the case, then the assumption is true according to the belief. For example, 3+3 = 6 is true while 3+3 =7 is false according to the mathematical

    Read More

  • Serious Errors within Rene Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy

    1094 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the first meditation, Descartes makes a conscious decision to search for “in each of them [his opinions] at least some reason for doubt”(12). Descartes rejects anything and everything that can be doubted and quests for something that is undeniably certain. The foundation of his doubt is that his opinions are largely established by his senses, yet “from time to time I [Descartes] have found that the senses deceive, and it is prudent never to trust completely those who have deceived us even once”(12). First, Descartes establishes that error is possible, employing the example of the straight stick that appears bent when partially submerged in water, as mentioned in the Sixth Replies (64-65). Secondly, he proves that at any given time he could be deceived, such is the case with realistic dreams. Further, Descartes is able to doubt absolutely everything since it cannot be ruled out that “some malicious demon … has employed all his energies in order to deceive me” (15). The malicious demon not only causes Descartes to doubt God, but also sends him “unexpectedly into a deep whirlpool which tumbles me around so that I can neither stand on the bottom or swim on the top”(16). Descartes has reached the point where he must begin to rebuild by searching for certainty.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: Cartesian Skepticism Created By René Descartes

    892 Words  | 2 Pages

    Cartesian Skepticism, created by René Descartes, is the process of doubting ones’ beliefs of what they happen to consider as true in the hopes of uncovering the absolute truths in life. This methodology is used to distinguish between what is the truth and what is false, with anything that cannot be considered an absolute truth being considered a reasonable doubt. Anything which then becomes categorized as a reasonable doubt is perceived as false. As Descartes goes through this process, he then realizes that the one thing that can be considered an absolutely truth is his and every other individual’s existence. Along with the ideology of Cartesian skepticism, through the thinking process, we are capable of the ability to doubt that which is surrounding them. This ability to think logically and doubt is what leads us to the confirmation of our existence.

    Read More

  • Thought Experiment By Rene Descartes

    1146 Words  | 3 Pages

    According to the dream thought experiment, ones senses could misguide someone into believe that they are awake, when in reality they are dreaming. The evil genius thought experiment puts into question if one is experiencing the true world or instead is being secretly deceived by another. Through exercising and exploring Descartes thought experiments, ones perspective toward life could be drastically altered. The effects of Descartes thought experiments in regards to one’s day-to-day life would be the lack of trust regarding ones senses. The thought experiments demonstrate Descartes claims that certain knowledge cannot be obtained through sense perception but rather through reasoning and the distinctiveness and clarity of the mind. The key to understanding the true external world, even if one is dreaming or being deceived is through the mind and its ability to

    Read More

  • Christopher Grau's Bad Dreams, Evil Demons, and the Experience Machine: Philosophy and the Matrix

    548 Words  | 2 Pages

    In “Bad Dreams, Evil Demons, and the Experience Machine: Philosophy and the Matrix”, Christopher Grau explains Rene Descartes argument in Meditation. What one may interpret as reality may not be more than a figment of one’s imagination. One argument that Grau points out in Descartes essay is how one knows that what one think is an everyday experience awake is not all a part of a hallucination. He uses the example of dreams to draw a conclusion about is claim based on experiences one would experience with dreaming. He asserts that there are times when one wake up from a dream that seems to be “vivid and realistic” however soon finds that it was not. The experience of reality in the dream was all a part of the mind. If dreams seem to be reality and one would not have any concept that one is dreaming how does one know that one is not dreaming now? Descartes point is that one cannot justify reality in the sense that one could be dreaming right at this moment and not know therefore one cannot trust the brain as an indicator of what is reality.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of The Dream Argument By Rene Descartes

    1523 Words  | 4 Pages

    René Descartes in the first of his Meditations offers the simple yet profound “Dreaming Argument” for scepticism. His Meditator asserts that most knowledge claims arise from our sensory interaction with the external world and, since our senses are occasionally unreliable, they cannot always be trusted. (Descartes I.3-4) Additionally, we regularly have vivid dreams about plausible events and, while asleep, are often convinced of being awake. Since we can be in dream-like states while “awake,” such as when seeing an illusion, and can also be fooled while “dreaming” to believe we are awake, the Meditator concludes that no convincing distinction can be made between the two states. This entails we cannot rely on sensory experience as the basis for

    Read More

  • Plato's The Allegory Of The Cave And Cogito Ergo Sum

    871 Words  | 2 Pages

    It is easy for us to believe that what we experience with our senses is true, including in our dreams, but according to Descartes, we should look beyond our senses and use reasoning to determine what is certain. Descartes’ question, “For how do we now that the thoughts that arise in us while we are dreaming are more false than others, since they are often no less vivid and explicit?” (34), is asked so that we will acknowledge that our senses can easily mislead us. This should then cause us to use reasoning to differentiate between truth and illusion, and both authors agree that reasoning should be the guide to true knowledge. Though he believes in the attainability of certain knowledge through using reasoning, Descartes argues that there are only a few things about which we can be certain. Descartes’s philosophy “Cogito, Ergo Sum,” which means I think, therefore I am proves this. He believes that because our mind acknowledges that we can think and have doubts, we can be sure of our existence; if we stopped th...

    Read More

  • Descartes' Meditations

    2133 Words  | 5 Pages

    Within meditation one Descartes subjects all of his beliefs regarding sensory data and even existence to the strongest and most hyperbolic of doubts. He invokes the notion of the all powerful, malign demon who could be deceiving him regarding sensory experience and even his understanding of the simplest mathematical and logical truths in order to attain an indubitable premise that is epistemologically formidable. In meditation one Descartes has three areas of doubt, doubt of his own existence, doubt of the existence of God, and doubt of the existence of the external world. Descartes’ knowledge of these three areas are subjected to three types of scepticism the first where he believes that his senses are being deceived ‘these senses played me false, and it is prudent never to trust entirely those who have once deceived us’. The second of the forms of scepticism revolves around whether Descartes is dreaming or not ‘I see so clearly that there are no conclusive signs by means of which one can distinguish between being awake and being asleep’. The aforementioned malign demon was Descartes third method of doubt as he realised God would not deceive him.

    Read More

  • The History Of Dreams: Informative Essay On Dreams

    708 Words  | 2 Pages

    Where do dreams come from? What actually are dreams? Do they mean something that is related in our real lives? All these questions can be answered by learning about the history of dreams in various cultures throughout time.

    Read More

More about Exploring Descartes' Dream Argument: A Skeptical Perspective

Open Document