Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How the matrix connects to descartes philosophy
Night dreams vs reality
How the matrix connects to descartes philosophy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How the matrix connects to descartes philosophy
The movie The Matrix is renowned of it’s confusing plot and attempt to produce a physical example of Descartes philosophy, but to what extent does this question the perception of reality. In the reading, Zynda focuses on three major questions of the Matrix and it’s relation to Descartes. The first question is how do we know we are dreaming? Second, can body exist without mind and vice versa? Third, What is real and how do you define it? The problem is how do we know what are reality is and can we trust our own senses. The three questions that The Matrix and Zynda pose are simply the same but in different form. Descartes answers that we cannot trust our own physical senses because they are too easily fooled. Furthermore this begs the question of what …show more content…
Since our senses are unable to confirm what is real and what is .not outside our mind then we have no way of knowing what is real or what is our reality. How do we know if we are dreaming or if this is reality? We don’t, from the book Meditations on First Philosophy he poses the idea that our senses deceive us the do not have the ability to decide if what we perceive is real and more importantly is the reality we sense our own? However, Zynda counterpoints Descartes rationalism with George Berkeley’s idealism. Idealism is the idea that there is nothing beyond our physical senses. Berkeley believes that your reality is your own and because it is the only one you are able to sense, it is the only reality. That what we perceive from our physical senses is reality, this counterpoints the The Matrix because The Matrix is suppose to make us question our version of reality. Descartes poses the possibility of an “evil genius” that sub-councioussly plants our sensory experiences. The Matrix uses the idea of “evil robots” as their “evil genius” planting the lucid dreams sensory details within the brains of the humans in the dystopian world. But what is the difference
In chapter ten of the book “Problems from Philosophy”, by James Rachels, the author, the author discusses the possibilities of human beings living in an actually reality, or if we are just living in an illusion. Rachels guides us through concepts that try to determine wiether we are living in a world were our perception of reality is being challenged, or questioned. Rachels guides us through the topic of “Our Knowledge of the World around Us”, through the Vats and Demons, idealism, Descartes Theological Response, and direct vs. indirect realism.
Descartes’ dream arguement that he engages in within the ‘First Meditation’ is very complex and tends to have readers feeling skeptical if they are truly awake and no whats going on in the world around them, or if they are actually just dreaming. His arguementcan be both easy to understand as well as breaking down claims to know certain things going on around the world. Descartes describes how people believing they are awake and not dreaming right now may be shaken and wary. At first glance, it came to my perspective that Descartes is delusional to believe that one might believe that they are dreaming and are not awake. I believe this because when one wakes up in the morning they are awake and no longer dreaming, when they open their eyes they see the world and they begin to once again exsist within the world, therefore to be dreaming is not certain and therefore would not make sense to a regualr person. Descartes highlights in his defense the lack of insight a person has in the condition when dreaming, while not awake. In “First Meditation”, Descartes states:
One primary concern is our perceptions of physical objects, which according to Descartes, exist in the immaterial. He reasons that all knowledge or experience of the world exists first in the mind, and that all physical experiences prove the mind’s existence. While an experience may have been false, such as a dream, the experience of the mind did surely exist, further proving the existence of the mind, separate of the physical world. (Descartes, 1983, p. 7) Descartes reasons that all things other than one’s own mind can be doubted, even God, and that thinking is the only thing that can be known to
The Matrix is a 1999 science fiction film written and directed by The Wachowskis, starring Keanu Reeves and Laurence Fishburne. It tells a story of a future in which reality to most humans is actually a computer program called "the Matrix”. In "the Matrix” humans are really sleep while their bodies are fed on my machines. The movie while directed to entertain audiences but also gave us many insights into philosophy. Many scenes in this movie reflect Descartes, and his many writings explaining them in a visual manner. In this paper I will show various examples of philosophy within the scenes and give commentary explaining each scene.
In The Matrix (1999), the world is not quite what it appears to be. Everybody perceives life to be nothing extraordinary, unaware of the devastating truth that lies within their experiences. In the film, Keanu Reeves stars as a computer programmer/hacker named Thomas Anderson, who goes by the alias “Neo”. The plot consists of Neo’s search for the truth behind the computer-generated world, “The Matrix”, or what he used to call ‘reality’. The entire movie revolves around a philosophical question posed by the 17th-century French philosopher Rene Descartes. Descartes believed that one could not know what is real based solely on sensory experiences. We cannot distinguish what is a real experience from a dream experience.
The teaching of Descartes has influenced many minds since his writings. Descartes' belief that clear and distinct perceptions come from the intellect and not the senses was critical to his ultimate goal in Meditations on First Philosophy, for now he has successfully created a foundation of true and certain facts on which to base a sold, scientific belief structure. He has proven himself to exist in some form, to think and therefore feel, and explains how he knows objects or concepts to be real.
In “Bad Dreams, Evil Demons, and the Experience Machine: Philosophy and the Matrix”, Christopher Grau explains Rene Descartes argument in Meditation. What one may interpret as reality may not be more than a figment of one’s imagination. One argument that Grau points out in Descartes essay is how one knows that what one think is an everyday experience awake is not all a part of a hallucination. He uses the example of dreams to draw a conclusion about is claim based on experiences one would experience with dreaming. He asserts that there are times when one wake up from a dream that seems to be “vivid and realistic” however soon finds that it was not. The experience of reality in the dream was all a part of the mind. If dreams seem to be reality and one would not have any concept that one is dreaming how does one know that one is not dreaming now? Descartes point is that one cannot justify reality in the sense that one could be dreaming right at this moment and not know therefore one cannot trust the brain as an indicator of what is reality.
Applying this dual-track test, "virtual" reality IS a reality, albeit, at this stage, of a deterministic type. It affects our minds, we know that it exists and we affect it in return. Our choices and actions irreversibly alter the state of the system. This altered state, in turn, affects our minds. This interaction IS what we call "reality". With the advent of stochastic and quantum virtual reality generators - the distinction between "real" and "virtual" will fade. The Matrix thus is not impossible. But that it is possible - does not make it real.
The main metaphysical theme of The Matrix brings into question, what is real? That appearances can be deceiving and our sense perception is only real because of electrical signals going to our brain telling us so is one of the main themes of the film. It is the very premise of the whole matrix deception. What makes something real or not real? If all that exists is matter and motion, what is a mind? Can a computer like Agent Smith, Neo's nemesis, have a mind? People perceive reality by using their senses; this is proven wrong because the people in the Matrix have been programmed to sense things in a particular way, therefore they cannot trust their senses. If they could trust their senses, the matrix would be real and it is not, it is an illusion. As for epistemology: Can we know what is Real? Morpheus tells Neo, "All I offer is the Truth." But can Morpheus really be sure that he knows the actual truth? Or does the belief of free will of choices make that idea embody what is to be believed?
The philosopher Descartes, after the focus changed from “what is real” to “even if I think I know what is real, how do I know it?”; realized that all his previous work was based on his own senses and the senses of others and so had no basis other than his belief in it. He knew that under certain conditions, such as distance and poor lighting, that his senses could be misled, but that those conditions could be compensated for. He realized that his senses could be misled when dreaming, and like the movie, challenges all to uncover ways to tell the difference between the two. All of us have had the experience of living a piece of time in our lives, such as waking and going to school to take a big test, only to find it a dream and we are actually still at home in our beds and that day we already lived in our mind, is actually just beginning. How do we know w...
"is what we see real, or is what we see our own reality?". What the human mind
Rene Descartes decision to shatter the molds of traditional thinking is still talked about today. He is regarded as an influential abstract thinker; and some of his main ideas are still talked about by philosophers all over the world. While he wrote the "Meditations", he secluded himself from the outside world for a length of time, basically tore up his conventional thinking; and tried to come to some conclusion as to what was actually true and existing. In order to show that the sciences rest on firm foundations and that these foundations lay in the mind and not the senses, Descartes must begin by bringing into doubt all the beliefs that come to him by the senses. This is done in the first of six different steps that he named "Meditations" because of the state of mind he was in while he was contemplating all these different ideas. His six meditations are "One:Concerning those things that can be called into doubt", "Two:Concerning the Nature of the Human mind: that it is better known than the Body", "Three: Concerning God, that he exists", "Four: Concerning the True and the False", "Five: Concerning the Essence of Material things, and again concerning God, that he exists" and finally "Six: Concerning the Existence of Material things, and the real distinction between Mind and Body". Although all of these meditations are relevant and necessary to understand the complete work as a whole, the focus of this paper will be the first meditation.
From the philosophical source, it could be stated that what we consider to be reality is not actually reality, but rather a dream world. So, what is reality? How do we know what we experience when we wake up is true reality? We could be plugged into a human-pod, like in The Matrix, where an operator is connected to our minds making us believe what we are experiencing is real. I am to explore this idea of reality and dreaming throughout this essay using key philosophers like Descartes, Locke and Berkeley.
Humans, especially philosophers, often ask the question 'How do we know that everything around us is real?' Skepticism was born from this question and is associated with incredulity. A skeptic is someone who questions things (particularly received opinions) and also practices the suspension of judgment. One of the oldest theories of Skepticism is the brain in a vat fable. The brain in a vat fable states that a disembodied brain is floating in a vat and being controlled in a scientist laboratory. A modern version of this, which, Chalmers tries to argue against, is the matrix. The matrix is modeled after the film The Matrix where the main character Neo thinks he lives in a city in 1999 but in reality he is floating in a pod in space, it's the
In Inception, Descartes idea that we can't trust our senses makes sense because the premise of Inception is that you can implant ideas into someone that is not their own idea. Since we perceive and use our senses in our dreams, Descartes makes a valid point when he states it is hard to distinguish dreams from reality. The movie gives the characters the ability to build dreams and input someone else's subconscious into your own.