Religious Diversity

622 Words2 Pages

The week one assignment asks the student to discuss a very complicated topic. The question is should employees be allowed to wear symbols of faith to the workplace? A thorough discussion on this topic must include the legal implications, the rights of employees, and business considerations as well.

The writer will discuss the topic from three different angles. The first discussion will center on the legal implications. The second part of the discussion will review the topic from the employee versus business perspective. Finally the writer will conclude with an opinion based on experience.

The homework assignment ask the question should employees be allowed to wear symbols of faith to the workplace. The article argues from two different points of view. Two professors have different opinions on the topic. Professor Robert Grossman argues for allowing employees to wear symbols of faith in the workplace. His arguments include the fact that Title VII dictates that there will be no religious discrimination in the workplace. He goes on to argue that several major corporations have adopted a very faith-friendly approach. Professor Grossman also explains that accepting religious diversity could have a positive impact on the bottom line. Dr. Robert Ramsey argues the reasons why companies should not allow employees to wear symbols of faith in the workplace. Dr. Ramsey explains that corporation’s first responsibility is to earn a profit. The corporation must pay close attention to customer needs first and foremost. The customers pay the bills. Dr. Ramsey is not opposed to religion in the workplace as long as it does not interfere with the company’s ability to make a profit (Bethel, 2011). …show more content…

Title VII is the law that applies in this discussion. This law was established in 1960. The law dictates that there will be no

Open Document