Thomas Moore's The Re-Enchantment Of Everyday Life

1204 Words3 Pages

Connections to Enchantment Have we, as people, lost touch with the essence of soul? The modern age has been clouded with the falsehood of natural gratification in the form of materialistic values held by today’s generations. In the context of Moore (though not directly defined), soul amounts to our heart, our deepest self and the basis of our capacity for intimacy, while enchanting—giving a genuine dedication as well as value to things that create a natural, innate satisfaction—our heart. Enchanting differs in each person because we are not programmed to function or behave the same allowing us to enchant in many ways such as: nature exploration, gardening, recreating memorable recipes, or even as simple as spending time with our grandparents.
A line from The Re-Enchantment of Everyday Life states, “A culture dedicated to enchantment recognizes our need to live in a world of both facts and holy imagination” (x). This quote ties in the importance of not simplifying and removing the mystery away from life. Life and the world we live should not be heavily reliant on the facts of life for then we kill some of the joy of exploring and adventuring into what the world has for us to experience. Another line Moore wrote claimed, “An enchanted world is one that speaks to the soul, to the mysterious depths of the heart and imagination where we find value, love, and union with the world around us” (x). This line deeply resonated with me as I, too, believe that an enchanted world gives off otherworldly sensations that allow us balance and maintain an appreciation for the world and the mystery it provides, whether through buildings, nature, homes, or the concept of
As Moore see it we are a civilization that is becoming riddled with anxieties. Moore does not see our advancements as beneficial to the enchantment of people as it hinders and replaces the creative and soulful in older art, buildings, and social structures into bland and predictive ones. Moore states, “If we continue to transform all nations of the world into homogenized high-tech, no-image, all-function cultures of disenchantment, we will have few unique spirits left to nourish our souls” (149). I cannot but partly agree with Moore’s thought because society has become progressively more uniform in the last decades. Similarities in buildings, art, social customs, and many more has made us more generalized and less unique as people and in what we create. As I agree that the soulful or creative drives that were more present in older structures are not as present in newer structures, yet I would not say that all modern buildings are soulless. I understand Moore view to connect closer with nature is a way to further enchantment, but to disregard something that may be different than your view of soulful is a little narrow-minded. Though, it may just me defending the roots of what we, millennials, believe about the status of how soulful our society is. Moore continues by using an example that states, “A corporation wishing simply to expand or to experiment with new

Open Document