Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A critical essay comparing and contrasting war poems
A critical essay comparing and contrasting war poems
A critical essay comparing and contrasting war poems
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: A critical essay comparing and contrasting war poems
“And the Bishop said: ‘The ways of God are strange!’.” Religion is one of the most noticeable themes that the World War 1 poets use. Death is another prominent subject of the poems written during the war. The home front is another theme in the poems. The loss of innocence is a major theme as well. Religion is used ironically in Thomas Hardy’s poem “Channel Firing”. The dead wake up to the noises of a gunnery practice thinking that it is Judgment Day. Judgement day, according to Christian belief, is the day when the human world is destroyed and the dead shall rise to receive their assignment from God on eternal bliss or eternal torment. However an angered God tells them “That this is not the judgement-hour”, but instead it is man trying to make …show more content…
As the dead lay back down, a parson comments that he wishes he had stuck to “Pipes and beer.” It can be inferred that the Parson thinks that all his preaching was useless in the face of the new era. He might as well have lived a life of sin for all the good he did preaching. God himself is disappointed in man it seems. He says to the effect that it’s good it’s not the judgment day because for many men “It will be warmer when I blow the trumpet.” By this it can be inferred that many men belong in Hell for their atrocities and actions. However, it can be questioned that if God finds it so distasteful, why does he allow such atrocities to occur? This question is never answered and the poem ends with the note, “Again the guns disturbed the hour.” In the poem “They” by Siegfried Sassoon religion is used satirically. The beginning of the poem starts with a Bishop trying to give comfort to those who will go to war. He says that the boys who go to war will come back changed because they have fought “In a just cause”. These are …show more content…
In Sassoon’s “On Passing the New Menin Gate” he writes about the unnecessary death of 54,889 soldiers at the Battle of Ypres in 1917 and the construction of a monument to honor them. He mentions “The unheroic Dead who fed the guns” and he wonders who will change the “foulness of their fate.” It can be conjectured that Sassoon is questioning the reason why the monument is being built when all who could appreciate it are dead. The next two lines question who will speak the truth of these soldiers’ death. “There name liveth for ever” is used sarcastically. Essentially it all breaks down to the question on whether or not death is worth a name on a heap of stone. A name is just a name, meaningless in the entirety of things. A name does not describe the horrors that the man went through before death, it does not tell of who the man was. This is described in the line, “These intolerably nameless names.” These men, who sacrificed their lives, will not be remembered for themselves, but just as a whole to give glory to their deaths. The dead should “Rise and deride this sepulchre of crime.” The building of this monument is a crime and degradation to all those who died and if the dead could rise, they would tear it down. What is the meaning of death and is there such a thing as an honorable death are two questions that can be inferred from this poem. Wilfred Owen’s “Anthem for Doomed Youth” has
“Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” by Jonathan Edwards and “The Minister’s Black Veil” by Nathaniel Hawthorne are both 1700s Puritan works of literature with similarities, as well as differences, from their theme to tone and to what type of literary work they are. Edwards and Hawthorne are both expressing the topics of how people are all sinners, especially in regards to their congregation and that questions their congregation’s faith.
With time, tragedies become statistics. The lives lost culminate to numbers, percentages, and paragraphs in textbooks,and though a recognition of its occurrence becomes universal, an understanding of its severity dies with those who lived it. “Leningrad Cemetery, Winter of 1941” is a literary medium by which the nature of tragedy is transmitted. Set in the post-battle Leningrad, the poem encapsulates the desolation not of war and its aftermath. Paramount in this translation is figurative language. Olds’ use of simile and metaphor in “Leningrad Cemetery, Winter of 1941” allows the reader to understand the incomprehensible horrors of war and, through contrast, the value of life.
These men are transformed into guilt-laden soldiers in less than a day, as they all grapple for a way to come to terms with the pain of losing a comrade. In an isolated situation, removed from the stressors, anxieties, and uncertainties of war, perhaps they may have come to a more rational conclusion as to who is deserving of blame. But tragically, they cannot come to forgive themselves for something for which they are not even guilty. As Norman Bowker so insightfully put it prior to his unfortunate demise, war is “Nobody’s fault, everybody’s” (197).
The poet Wilfred Owen was one of many poets who were against war. He reflected this idea of anti-war in his poems, one of his poems called “Anthem for Doomed Youth”, mirrors most aspects of war all put together in this short still deep poem. An example of that would be when the speaker stated,” What passing-bells for these who die as cattle?”(1) The speaker asks is there any sound that marks our soldier’s death other than the sounds of church bell’s which are mostly rung to represent somebody’s absence? Clearly, the speaker sets anger as the tone of the poem through this question to show that soldier’s death is unremarkable.. The speaker compares the soldiers to a “cattle” which illustrates that soldiers are treated more like animals with no feelings and also shows how they are killed indiscriminately in war. Finally the line ironically contains an iambic pentameter which is a natural rhythm for such dark, grim, dull subject. The two novels, The Red Badge of Courage by Stephen Crane, and All Quiet on The Western Front by Erich Maria Remarque, both present a similar idea of how soldiers are killed out there in the front comprehensively and the dehumanization of war towards its soldiers. The first novel is set during the Civil War, and it focuses on the psychological aspects of one soldier named Henry Fleming and how his naive thoughts about war constantly change through the course of the novel. The second novel presents the life of a soldier named Paul Baumer and his friends who were faced with the terribleness of war and how severely it affected their lives. The Red badge of Courage and All Quiet on The Western Front are similar in the way of how the main characters develop through the novel to change from naïve and innocent men ...
are not free in service, you do what you are told and this is the same
In conclusion, depending on the position from which one views war, the standpoint may vary ranging from being supportive of the soldiers because those who die are dying for the country or they are completely unsupportive of war activities because it is a brutal and gruesome experience involving countless unnecessary injuries and deaths. Affected by a number of factors, the authors of the two poems have chosen opposing standpoints on the issue of war where Tennyson glorified it with the main message that it is an honour to die for one's country whereas the other, Owen suppresses the idea of war by illustrating all the horrid experiences of a soldier.
In short, the persona in the poem uses irony to speak of warfare as being kind. In effect, the reader can see that when there is war people, specifically men, are forced to “slaughter” each other just how one would slaughter an animal. The voice of the poem emphasizes that war does not only dehumanize men, but that their family members are indefinitely traumatized by their gruesome death. In turn, the death of these men is depicted through kinesthetic, auditory and gustratory images that together along with the use of alliteration and anaphora’s function in relation with the whole poem and its theme. All of these particular parts contribute to the message the persona explains; warfare affects the soldiers and their families alike and the results aren’t virtuous.
World War I was a time of despair, rivalry, and hatred between a number of countries due to not one, but many reasons. The experiences people had during World War I were gruesome and not something they would ever want to happen again. Unfortunately the event of a Second World War broke out after the first one ended. Every soldier’s nightmare was to fight this battle for a second time. There were many underlying causes to the war and upon hearing and realizing how bad of a time it was through what people went through, it was a horrific time for everyone who experienced it including Germany, Austria-Hungary, Ottoman Empire, Britian, France, Russia, Italy, and Japan. A book, All Quiet on the Western Front was written about a young German soldier and his experience and perspective on the war. Paul Baumer enlists in the German Army when the Great War broke out in 1914. His enthusiasm as being part of an Army wanes and turns into him living in constant fear of being apart of fighting in a war. Along with Paul Baumer, there were millions of others who had the experience of fighting in World War I. Poems including, In Flander Fields, Anthem for a Doomed Youth, Dulce et Decorum Est, The Happy Warrior, Before Action, and Back were also written to incorporate the themes of the horror of war. The horrendous war led to experiences that were surreal and terrible enough not to be mentioned by those who were in it. During the aftermath of the Great War, a new perspective was created on modern war and society by analyzing the frightful encounters everyone had, including Paul Baumer in All Quiet on the Western Front which identified his experience of war.
World War One was a massive event. It affected millions of people from all walks of life, and inspired countless written pieces. Nevertheless, without being there, it is impossible to truly be able to tell what the war is like. Therefore the use of setting is very important in giving the reader an idea of the circumstance. This is not to say that everyone is in agreement over how the war should be displayed. Quite one the contrary, the two Poems “In Flanders Fields” and “Dulce et Decorum Est” use their settings to create two very contrasting images of human conflict.
As a poet, Wilfred Owens wants to show the effects of warfare from the viewpoint of a soldier during a War. Owens uses his own experience as a fighter to capture the reader’s attention and get across his point. He often uses graphic imagery and words to depict his thoughts about war. Wilfred Owens, poems, “Dulce et Decorum est” and “Anthem for doomed youth” talk blatantly about the effects of warfare on the soldiers, their loved ones, and those who make an ultimate sacrifice by making a statement about the efficacy of war.
‘Poetry can challenge the reader to think about the world in new ways.’ It provokes the readers to consider events, issues and people with revised understanding and perspectives. The poems Dulce Et Decorum Est (Wilfred Owen, 1917) and Suicide in the Trenches (Siegfried Sassoon, 1917), were composed during World War One and represented the poets’ point of views in regards to the glorification of war and encouraged readers to challenge their perspectives and reflect upon the real consequences behind the fabrications of the glory and pride of fighting for one’s nation.
"Channel Firing" by Thomas Hardy is a poem about the atrocities of war. Published shortly before the beginning of World War I, the poem seems almost prophetic. It not only decries the barbaric nature of war--an institution so vile and obnoxious that in this poem it awakens the dead--but also questions our inability to break our addiction to that institution. Less clear, however, is the answer to a question Hardy seems to be posing: is it our plight to be perpetually engaged in quests for power and vengeance, rendering us unworthy of God's call to judgment, or is it our plight that a sneering, uncaring god forsakes us in our time of need?
He may have used this technique to make war seem if it had made men
There is a oxymoron when it is written "undying dead" (line 9) and this shows how the government emphasizes that more men should fight in war and if they do not, they would feel guilty. If the soldiers do not fight the war, they would die in
...f the poem is that each soldier will not be remembered because they are one in so many that did not have no funeral or a body; they would have no grave stone and will just be forgotten.