Reflection On Asylum Seekers

711 Words2 Pages

SUMMARY Reflection (Choose a quote or series of quotes and respond. Locate your reflection in evidence and LANGUAGE not in feelings) Asylum seekers flee their homes for various reasons and are scrutinized when applying for refuge. LADO examines potential refugees and their language use to measure their credibility. However, this does not take into account folk linguistic views as a determiner. Many individuals have subconsciously used folk linguistics. They carry their own notions and implement them into language use. For instance, some societies perceive certain
Language and dialects as unintelligent and not beautiful. Folk linguistics can be visible when comparing Standard English and African American language. Some individuals …show more content…

Linguists are not responsible for, or qualified to provide solution to problems relating to asylum seekers’ claims about origin, whether national, ethnic, or regional” (Eades, 422).

Social injustice is present in LADO work; however, linguists who work for LADO are not the perpetrators. An individual’s origin cannot be solely determined based on their language use. Lexical can be influenced from various reasons and easily adapted into an individual’s lifestyle. Linguists should not be given the burden to determine if a refugee is being truthful about one’s origin. For instance, in the guidelines it mentions how linguists should not be asked to make determinations about national origin, nationality or citizenship (414). In addition, linguists follow a folk linguistic mindset where applicants can be perceived as uneducated, based on their language usage. These conclusions have no evidence to support their analysis. For example, reports tend to give no indication on how an applicant speaks ungrammatically. Hence, linguists utilize these notions due to being pressured to carry out the role of distinguishing between whether a refugee is telling the truth or

Open Document