Racialized Sex Work In Canada

1740 Words4 Pages

In Canada, sex work has routinely been pathologized and criminalized. The stigma surrounding sex work is tenfold for sex workers who are racialized. Using the lecture discussions from weeks 8 and 11, as well as additional journals, scholarly and peer reviewed articles, this paper aims to illustrate the struggle involved with partaking in sex work as a racialized individual. The first section of this paper explores the danger involved in prostitution while being racialized, analyzing how the risk increases exponentially for racialized groups. The second section will focus primarily on the imprisonment of racialized sex workers, explaining the frequency of arrest in comparison to Caucasian, middle class sex workers. Finally, the last section …show more content…

For example, section 213 of the original version of Criminal Code of Canada, states that it is illegal behavior if someone communicates, “in a public place or in any place open to public view, for the purpose of offering, providing or obtaining sexual services…” (Bruckert and Parent, 2006). This law is particularly harmful to racialized sex workers as it is practically impossible for them to do their job without engaging in this sort of behaviour. Non-marginalized sex workers, who have easier access to jobs in the sex industry off the street, do not have speak with clients prior to engaging in sexual intercourse. Everything is sorted out by a third party, so the sex worker themselves are not in danger of breaking this law. With this in mind, it seems as if this law specifically targets racialized sex workers, demonstrating the challenges of being racialized and trying to be a sex professional. In 2007, Terri Jean Bedford went up against the government of Canada in an attempt to get rid of these harmful laws pertaining to sex work, claiming they were unconstitutional (van der Meulen, 2017a). She won and the laws were modified, however, the new version of these laws still actively target racialized sex workers. The SCC stated in their decision that section 213 was unconstitutional because, “by prohibiting communication in public for the purpose of prostitution, the law prevents prostitutes from screening clients and setting terms for the use of condoms or safe houses. In these ways, it significantly increases the risk they face…” (Bennett, 2013). However, the government went around this ruling by modifying the laws ever so slightly that they were considered “new laws” but they infringe on the rights of sex workers to the same extent that the old laws had. It can be argued that the

Open Document