Bryan Stevenson's Identity: The Power Of Identity

834 Words2 Pages

Identity is primarily described primarily as what makes a person who they are. While it is seen as an individual asset, one’s identity can be shaped and persuaded not only by life experiences, but by society as well. Bryan Stevenson speaks on several controversial issues and proclaims certain societal problems and the typical behaviors noticed in response to them. How one approaches the issues that are spoken about may expose their true identity. Stevenson argues that how one reacts to racial inequality within the criminal justice system may regulate their identity. In addition to that, how dealing with the nation’s history may force a growth on one’s identity, eventually bringing peace and acceptance to the nation. Lastly, how one views the …show more content…

Bryan Stevenson states that in the U.S one out of three black men are either in prison or on probation/parole. Within the criminal justice system, it has been brought up that there is still racial and wealth inequality. Stevenson argues that one is likely to be treated better if they are rich and guilty opposed to being poor and innocent. Identity becomes a factor in this controversial issue when it is clear that no one is fighting for the equality. Stevenson brings up the point of the issue not being personal. If the problem is not personal, then it’s not the problem of the community. However, he argues that if no one will address problem, then the problem will never get solved. Similarly, Bryan Stevenson proclaims that within the nation, identity is based solely on how the poor is treated. People in poverty have a lack of opportunity, and they are often blamed and mistreated for this unfortunate way of life. Stevenson goes on to say that “the opposite of poverty is not wealth, it is justice.” What he means by this statement is that poverty is unjust. The fact that one is less fortunate the most should never be the reason to be mistreated. Recognizing that poverty is injustice is a positive way of improving one’s identity because may be the start of dealing with one of the nation’s many …show more content…

He contends that the identity is determined by the question one asks themselves in regards to this type of punishment – “do people deserve to be killed for the crimes they commit?” or “do we deserve to kill?” Stevenson continues to argue that everyone’s humanity is dependent on one another. Every person’s identity comes together as one to make up the identity of the nation, so to be inhumane can easily become contagious throughout the country. Likewise, Stevenson shows his agreement to Germany’s opinion on the death penalty. Because of the past events in their own nation, Germany “cannot engage in systematic killing” for it is seen as “unconscionable.” The U.S has disturbing events in the past that should cause the nation to view the death penalty as inhumane and immoral as well, however, because it is not seen as such, the positive identity of the nation is in

Open Document