Ever since the advent of diseases, quarantine has been used to restrain the spreading of a disease by isolating the carrier of the disease. The method is effective in stopping epidemics from occurring. However, many debates have arose regarding the circumstances under which a person should be placed in quarantine. Some people state that a person should be placed in quarantine if they have the slightest chance of being infected because the risk of starting an epidemic is too great. On the other hand, others state that a person should not be placed in quarantine until they show symptoms of the disease they are suspected of carrying. Although putting all potential carriers in quarantine may seem excessive and be an encroachment on the person’s …show more content…
The benefits of quarantine are overwhelming. It has saved countless human lives and prevented the suffering of countless individuals. Many people have acknowledged the necessity of quarantine. People who have the chance of being infected realize that this civic duty calls them to sacrifice their freedom of movement for the well-being of the public (Source D). The temporary sacrifice of a handful of people is justified when compared to the potential deaths of hundreds of people if the disease manages to spread. Therefore, when the magnitudes of the benefits and negatives of quarantine are compared, quarantine is the most logical and safe action to take. Quarantine also enables doctors and other officials to focus on the potential carriers of the disease while alleviating the community's fear of the spread of the potent disease (Source B). As a result, quarantine is able to knock out two birds with one stone. It allows doctors to isolate and focus on the infected, and it also allows public officials to maintain order in the community. The benefits of quarantine can be seen in the case of rabies in wild animals. The quarantine of potential carriers of rabies prevents the spread of the disease, and it also gives doctors a chance to examine and treat potential victims of the disease (Source E). Therefore, quarantine is able to save lives, prevent the spread of diseases, and maintain social integrity. The benefits of …show more content…
They state that quarantine is an encroachment on the rights of the person who does not show symptoms but is still placed in quarantine (Source C). Putting people in quarantine without empirical evidence violates the freedom of movement of the victim and creates greater stigma for the disease, resulting in public chaos. In the eyes of the critics, by putting a person in quarantine solely based off of suspicion, officials are destroying the lives of the victims and inviting chaos into the community. The critics also bring attention to the Siracusa principles which are designed to establish circumstances under which freedoms can be restricted (Source D). Putting people in quarantine without ferring to the Siracusa principles is a violation of the law and the moral codes that govern society. Therefore, critics claim that quarantine should be the final measure taken in desperation rather than the first action taken in confidence. The placement of people in quarantine without justification calls attention to the reasoning behind quarantine as well. Certain critics claim that officials resort to quarantine to merely stop the spread of confusion (Source F). Rather than using it to stop the spread of diseases, officials are abusing the civil rights of citizens by placing them in quarantine solely to maintain social order. Although the statements of these critics
Vaccines should be put in children when are born to prevent any diseases when they are
There are rare cases, when society has to make the tough decision to overlook a person's basic rights for the good of the general public, Mary Mallon is one of these exceedingly rare cases. Mary Mallon was a carrier of Typhoid fever, because of this she was denied her way of life and her passion. Typhoid left an abysmal impression on Mary’s life, but she did not let let sickness define who she was. Mary left a lasting mark in her own subtle way, her life was more paramount than meets the eye, she opened the eyes of scientists all over the world and taught the world a near impossible lesson about never giving in.
...at in domestic animals, which indicates wild animals cause a higher risk to humans. Controlling the disease in susceptible wild free-ranging animal populations is implemented by oral vaccination and recombinant rabies vaccine by use of vaccine-containing bait. The best prevention is decreasing chances to expose to the disease. Once a patient is suspected as a rabies case, the physician and local health administrator should decide whether infection actually occurs and whether a risk of rabies exists in the geographic area. Once the identification is completed, the patient should receive post-exposure prophylaxis immediately, which contains the combination of local wound cleansing, human rabies immune globulin (HRIG) and rabies vaccine. The population such as veterinarians, animal handlers that have higher risk to be infected should receive pre-exposure immunization.
..., exposure to any kind of infection such as colds and influenza should be avoided.
National Institute of Medicine (2007) Ethical and legal considerations in mitigating pandemic disease Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK54163/
...s to warrant vaccinating the entire population. On this same note, please make sure your pets are vaccinated. While we are on top of the situation now, things spread quickly!
We reserve the right to refuse service: Most people have seen these signs at restaurants and retail shops. But now, metaphorically, some hospitals are hanging such notices over their entryways by promulgating "futile care" protocols that grant doctors the right to say no to wanted life-extending medical treatment to patients whose lives they consider lacking in sufficient quality to justify the cost of care.
... isolation policy provided patients with some social support, but continuously deprived them of their civil liberties. Furthermore, the policy as an authoritative statement on the disease may have fostered the social stigma associated with a belief that the disease is a dreadful contagion, thereby maintaining a hurdle to patients' reintegration into society. Evidently, the policy's abolition was not easily accomplished nor was achieved solely by advances in scientific knowledge”. (P. 10)
Many states and colonies across the globe issued detailed sets of directives to their residents on what exactly they should do if they come into contact with the illness. One such example is the directive issued by T.W.H. Holmes, the Secretary of the Victoria Board of Public Health in Australia. The directive details the symptoms, complications, treatment, and prevention of the disease. Something very common during the outbreak of any pandemic is the use of quarantines to separate the sick and the healthy. In fact, that is the first order for prevention of disease in T.W.H. Holme...
The movie ‘Contagion’ was released in 2011 depicting the dramatization of a world-wide pandemic of a virus strain killing millions of people in just a matter of months. The movie brought memories as to how global pandemics such as the swine flu were handled a few years back. The movie demonstrated how health professionals would react to a large-scale spread of an unknown virus. During the movie, several epidemiological concepts were addressed. The influential work of epidemiologists and the on-site ground work they have to go through in order to achieve their goal was perceived to be accurate throughout the movie.
6 2. The standard critical care regimen which had never saved anyone from rabies who had not been vaccinated after exposure. 6 3. Induce a coma.
Many people come to the United States of America in order to live freely and make choices based on their personal morals. Considering the fact that America is known for being the “land of the free”, people should be able to choose whether or not they want to get vaccinated. People should have the right to reject vaccinations for whatever reason it may be, whether it’s religious beliefs, health concerns, or lack of belief in the vaccination systems. Personally, Vaccinations have benefited me and my health, and I choose to get vaccinated. I choose to get vaccinated because I strongly believe in a way it helps build my immune system and keeps me from getting sick or catching diseases. However, people have different beliefs than mine. Therefore
Vaccination has become a debatable topic in Australia. Parents are feeling pressured into vaccinating their children and are having their rights to decide taken away from them. The education department and health department are refusing children access into early learning education without proper vaccinations records. The health department have started a campaign called “No Jab No Play”. This campaign is supposed to benefit communities and help our country finally eradicate fatal diseases but its being accused of decimating and bulling parents into vaccination.
Those who actively pursue denying the rights of others while trying to further their cause lead to a hatred against their movement. Vaccines, while an important aspect in maintaining proper health they should not be absolutely mandatory. The choice of vaccination should be left to the parents, as it is their right to nurture and care for their kids as they see fit(Anthony). Furthermore, a governmental mandate on vaccination causes many issues, it denies rights to the parents, it denies right to the grown adults and it taxes those who don’t comply. This strategy is not a very American approach, it is a strict mandate, and order then to conform. This goes against the American concepts of individualism(Anthony), this concept is Communist. There are also many circumstances that mandatory vaccination neglects, this includes the civil liberties granted to all citizens by the first amendment, and the equal protection granted by the 13 amendment(US Constitution). There are many reasons why the idea of mandatory
To immunize or not to immunize your family Diseases and viruses have an epidemic way of spreading when introduced into a community. There are many Common ways people can contract or spread diseases/viruses for some are by sneezing, coughing, contact with bodily fluids, sexual contact or not washing your hands. Today one of the most effective ways of fighting off many of the diseases/viruses is through vaccinations, but there is mixed views about the benefits or downfalls of getting immunized. Should parents chose not to immunize their children now days, the reasons could be that they no longer trust the government or sience findings. it could also be that in today’s world we no longer see the high mortality rates caused by communicable diseases