CASE STUDY ANALYSIS: THE VASA CAPSIZES The Vasa was a custom-built warship by King Gustav of Sweden in 1625. This case study analysis will inspect the factors that led to the ultimate capsizing of the Vasa on its maiden voyage in 1628, in her own harbor. Discussion/Analysis Case Study Questions 1. Why did the Vasa capsize? What contributing role did the various parties play? Who was responsible? The Vasa was capsized because it was not seaworthy. The customer specifications for the Vasa mentioned only the fairly accurate dimensions of the ship and the armaments it would hold, not as per the requirement to be seaworthy. It was shipbuilder responsibility to ensure that Vasa would float and be able to sail under power of the wind. The …show more content…
The temperature on the morning of the launch was unusually cold and engineers warned supervisors that components, such as the O-rings which sealed rocket booster joints, were subject to failure at low temperatures. From NASA supervisors and managers, to the company that designed the rocket boosters, these warnings and vulnerabilities were ignored, minimized, and excused. Similarly, as was the case with the Vasa, the King pressed and pressed on the shipbuilders to hasten the construction of the Vasa, when resources and materials were their most constrained, including the master shipbuilders themselves, not part of the major portion of construction effort. To wit, Admiral Fleming had to conduct the stability test in their absence and he is on record as having stated “the shipbuilder has built ships before”, in an attempt to excuse and wave off the Boatswain’s warnings that the ship was too narrow at its bottom to be stable under way. As well, Fleming wished the King, himself, had witnessed the test, himself likely believing this was the only way to convey the potential risk of proceeding with the vessel’s launch under rushed conditions, literally pieced together in haste with the wrong sized materials because the correct lumber pieces were not on hand to construct it according to the Kings numerous design revisions. The King didn’t care and no one dared to make him. The result, like as in the three cases to which the Vasa has been herein compared, was a preventable disaster, but for leadership’s negative influence and the “it’s safer to be silent” culture it seemed to imbue in
This paper investigates why Donald McKay is the father of American clipper ships. He was born in Shelburne, Nova Scotia, September 4, 1810.2 When Donald was sixteen years old he had the desire to learn the trade of ship building, so he went to New York. In 1826 New York was the worlds best shipbuilder and shipbuilding was America’s leading industry. McKay decided that in order to learn the trade he must obtain an apprenticeship. So he became an apprentice to Isaac Web who has appropriately been called the “Father of Shipbuilders”. This is because more successful master shipbuilders came out of Web’s shipyard than from any other place in America.3 At the conclusion of his apprenticeship he went on to work for Brown & Bell. In 1832 packet building was the best and most readily available work in New York. The majority of these ships were built at Isaac Web’s, Brown & Bell’s, and Smith & Dimon’s. At this time McKay was what would be called a free lance ship wright. McKay then married Albenia Martha Boole the eldest daughter of John Boole.4 At this time McKay then went to Newburyport and formed a partnership with William Currier.
The Lusitania was destroyed in the same was as the Titanic as they could not pull the boats into the sea and water kept rushing into the hull through the front where the torpedo hit as the boat couldn’t be stopped.
- If all of the options were explored, and patient is given antibiotics and is treated without any pain or suffering than the treatment identifies with the ethnical principles of autonomy, non-maleficence, and veracity. In turn, Mrs. Dawson will be happy with the outcome of the procedure.
"The Wreck of the Henrietta Marie." The Mel Fisher Maritime Museum. 2001. Mel Fisher Maritime Heritage Society, Inc., Web. 13 Dec 2009. .
Rodney Rocha is a NASA engineer and co-chair of Debris Assessment Team (DTS). When possibility of wing damage appeared he requested an additional imagery to obtain more information in order to evaluate the damage. This demonstrates that he actually tried to resolve the issue. However, due to absence of clear organizational responsibilities in NASA those images were never received. Since foam issue was there for years and risk for the flights was estimated as low management decided not to proceed with this request. After learning of management decision Rocha wrote an e-mail there he stated that foam damage could carry grave hazard and have to be addressed. At the same time this e-mail was not send to the management team. Organizational culture at NASA could be described as highly bureaucratic with operations under standard procedures only. Low-end employees like Rocha are afraid to bring any safety-related issues to the management due to delay of the mission. They can be punished for bringing “bad news”. This type of relationship makes it impossible for two-way communication between engineers and managers, which are crucial for decision-making in complex env...
Spokane Industries has contracted Franklin Electronics for an 18 month product development contract. Franklin Electronics is new to using project management methodologies and has not been exposed to earned value management methodologies. Even though Franklin and Spokane have worked together in the past, they have mainly used fixed-price contracts with little to no stipulations. For this project, Spokane Industries is requiring Franklin Electronics to use formalized project management methodologies, earned value cost schedules, and schedules for reports and meetings. Since Franklin Electronics had no experience with earned value management, the cost accounting group was trained in the methodology in order to bid for the project.
The Titanic was built to be unsinkable, with 16 watertight compartments to help keep it afloat. Many people called the R.M.S. Titanic “unsinkable”, because of how large it was. To many the Titanic, being the biggest ship, also meant it was the best. Publishers Weekly; 3/19/2012, Vol. 259 Issue 12, p30-32, 3p. The ship was advertised as “unsinkable as reasonably possible,” because of it’s numerous safety features. These features included automatic watertight doors, watertight bulkheads and compartments throughout the ship, the most powerful marconi at sea and the Titanic was so large, that it was thought that anything large enough to damage it would be seen in time. They were wrong. Courier Mail, The (Brisbane). 04/03/2012, p38-38. 1.
Captain Aubrey exhibits and demonstrates leadership characteristics that inspire his crew to be the best that they can be. One of the most important leadership traits that Captain Jack has is a single-minded focus on his purpose. All of his decisions are held up against the g...
Smith, Patrick. "The Untold Story of the Concorde Disaster." Ask The Pilot. Aerophilia Enterprises, 9 Dec. 2012. Web. 6 Nov. 2013. .
First, I will cover the actual weather conditions of that night and how they may have impacted the ship. Some believe th...
Case study: NYC subway design The transportation developed new concept known as rapid transit or subway which is a public Underground Railroad usually assembled under cities to travel only inside urban areas. It carries a large group of people long distances in shorter periods of time than any roadway vehicles by following shorter lines, taking underwater paths, and avoiding the overcrowded streets. The metro story was initially established in London, England, where millions of people lived there. Charles Pearson, who suggested adding a principal method of transportation to England, found the support from the government to develop the transportation inside the city in 1843. Construction began in 1860 and it was completed in January 1863.
In 19th century, Titanic was the largest moving man-made object in world. And it was the largest luxurious ship in the world has shown the cost of wrong material selection, inappropriate design and unsuitable technology used. Even though a gigantic iceberg caused the titanic to sink inferior materials used in the applications, wrong reverts design, and in quality irons that used in application also forced the ships to sink so quickly. (Reference: metallurgy of the RMS titanic, Tim Foecke)
Her ensign dropped limp like a rag; the muzzles of the long six-inch guns stuck out all over the low hull; the greasy, slimy swell swung her up lazily and let her down, swaying her thin masts. In the empty immensity of earth, sky, and water, there she was, incomprehensible, firing into a continent (49).
The Titanic was the largest ship ever built back in the year of 1912. With the ship weighing 46,000 tons and almost 900 feet long it was deemed to be unsinkable. On April 12, 1912, the ship pulled away from the dock with 2,200 passengers of all different classes from rich to poor. On its maiden voyage, tragedy struck when it hit an iceberg along its travel. How did this ship that was declared to be unsinkable sink exactly? Human factors and the way the ship was built caused the tragedy of the sinking of the Titanic.
After the accident, a full-scale investigation was launched by the United States National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). It concluded that the accident was caused by metal fatigue exacerbated by crevice corrosion, the corrosion is exacerbated by the salt water and the age of the aircraft was already 19 years old as the plane operated in a salt water environment.