Public Stigma Mental Illness

851 Words2 Pages

Stigma interferers in the treatment of mental illness by creating negative stereotypes that remove social opportunities and damage the self-esteem of the individual. By facilitating these negative outcomes, stigma effectively incentivises the avoidance or discontinuation of psychological treatment through mechanisms such as labelling theory. Stigma is a concept that encompasses a wide range of human interaction and as such is difficult to conceptualize. Corrigan and Wassell (2008) define stigma as existing in two main categories: Public and Self. Public stigma is defined as the actions of the public towards individuals with a mental illness; whilst self-stigma refers to the internalization of public stigma by individuals and the consequential …show more content…

(Martin, Pescosolido, & Tuch, 2000) conducted a study to document the presence of public stigma and place it within the context of real world interactions. The study utilized data from the 1996 General Social Survey to gauge public attitudes towards people with mental illness. They found that a significant portion of the population were unwilling to have people with a mental illness as neighbours (33%), friends (38%) or co-workers (68%). These statistics show a significant public intolerance of people suffering from mental illness. The paper however, suggests that the want for social distance can be attributed to the perceived dangerousness of the individual; implying the underlying cause of the stigma could be inaccurate stereotypes. Their results along with other findings clearly identify a significant level of public stigma (Albrecht, Walker & Levy, 1982). This loss of opportunities can have a serious impact on quality of life, leading individuals to avoid treatment in an attempt to avoid public stigma (Alvidrez, Snowden & Kaiser, …show more content…

The consequential formation of self-stigma acts as a major barrier to treatment (Abiri, Oakley, Hitchcock & Hall, 2016). A study conducted by Otto F. Whal (1999) explored the experiences of mentally ill individuals regarding stigma and discrimination. The study was composed of two parts: a survey and an interview. The survey asked a series of questions regarding the sources of public stigma and the nature of the discrimination. The results revealed that a substantial portion of the subjects’ report being avoided after revealing their illness (60%), hearing others say offensive things regarding their illness (80%) and viewing media involving their illness that they found hurtful (77%). The second half of the study involved a telephone interview with a select 100 participants of the survey. The interview focused on the impact of the discriminatory experience on their emotional wellbeing. Of the 100 participants: 95 felt a lasting impact, 57 had lowered self-esteem and 39 became less likely to disclose their illness. His findings present a link between the exposure to public stigma and the internalization of the attitudes; making individuals less inclined to disclose their illness and lowering their self-esteem. This harmful internalization is the source of self-stigma, which ultimately impedes on treatment through a variety of

Open Document