More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparing and contrasting public and private schools
Compare and contrast of public and private schools
Comparing and contrasting public and private schools
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In order to protect the existence of public education, must the charter school movement be rejected? According to Stan Karp, author of "Charter Schools and the Future of Public Education", the expansion of charter schools inhibits the development of a democratic system of public education. He asserts that charter schools function as a tool for business investment. Thus, they do not facilitate the development of an egalitarian institution which serves the common good. On the contrary, Jason Russell, author of "We Need More Urban Charter Schools, Not Fewer", asserts that charter schools operate to accommodate needs that public schools cannot satisfy. Consequently, they are vital institutions in urban communities, which often lack sufficient resources. While Karp and Russell both value the quality of schools, they disagree on how to ensure that students are attending quality schools.
In "Charter Schools and the Future of Public Education", Stan Karp asserts that charter schools hinder students access to equal education, as they produce tiers which benefit separate student populations. This highlights how Karp values
…show more content…
Russell believes that charter schools are necessary to provide quality education to students who do not have access to satisfactory public schools. Thus, Karp places greater importance on the democratic mission of public education. In accordance with the democratic mission of public education, the existence of charter schools impairs equal access and opportunity. According to Russell, charter schools do not impair equal access and opportunity because they exist as an alternative for students and families who are dissatisfied with their public schools. Therefore, their shared value of quality education does not lead to any points of agreement between them. Rather, they look to different solutions to solve educational
...hools perform better than public schools? No, no and no. the numbers retrieved in research do not lie. 83% of charter schools are doing no better and even worse than public schools. Charter school teachers are 132% more likely to resign willingly from their positions as a teacher than teachers from public schools. Multiple cases of charter school owners misusing large amounts of money, not just any money, but your earn hard-earned cash. The fact that competition is not helping anything but widening a gap between reality and general copouts. There is no morality in limiting sources to a select few students. The solution lies in the expansion of widespread resources to all students. Put the money and effort in to the general cause of public schooling. If it is not broke, why try to fix it? Charter schools are not the solution to the problem, but the fuel to the fire.
Arguments For: Allows individuals or groups with innovative educational ideas to put them into practice without being unduly hampered by local or state bureaucracy. These schools may have unconventional hours, experiment with curricula, specialize in certain types of teaching or design programs tailored to a particular audience or community. Charter schools can introduce the ingredient of a measure of needed competition to the public schools. They may provide for more accountability because schools that work will be rewarded and those that do not will be changed or even closed.
“Many charter schools segregate students along the racial and class lines and that they may also tend to lack services for students with disabilities or limited English proficiency, which leads to less diversity in Charter schools. Charter schools have their own school boards and are typically free to experiment with instructional and disciplinary methods, Charter schools are privately run by boards that are appointed by charter organizations rather the public which means less local accountability and
Spring, Joel. (2014). Chapter 8: Local Control, Choice, Charter Schools, and Home Schooling. American Education. (Sixteenth Edition). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Zimmer, R. and Buddin, R. (2009), Is Charter School Competition in California Improving the Performance of Traditional Public Schools?. Public Administration Review, 69: 831–845. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02033.x
Charter schools are public schools of choice, meaning that families choose them for their children. They operate with freedom from some of the regulations that are imposed upon school districts. Charter schools are accountable for academic results and upholding the promises made in their charters.
The idea that vouchers give parents a choice of schools for their children is simply incorrect. The only people who have any real choice in the matter are the private...
The gap between the nation’s best and worst public schools continues to grow. Our country is based on freedom and equality for all, yet in practice and in the spectrum of education this is rarely the case. We do not even have to step further than our own city and its public school system, which many media outlets have labeled “dysfunctional” and “in shambles.” At the same time, Montgomery County, located just northwest of the District in suburban Maryland, stands as one of the top school systems in the country. Within each of these systems, there are schools that excel and there are schools that consistently measure below average. Money alone can not erase this gap. While increased spending may help, the real problem is often rooted in the complex issues of social, cultural, and economic differences. When combined with factors involving the school itself and the institution that supports it, we arrive at what has been widely known as the divide between the suburban and urban schools. Can anything actually be done to reverse this apparent trend of inequality or are the outside factors too powerful to change?
One of the more recent policy issues that has arisen in Florida is the amount of funding that Charter school should receive from the state. There are those on the Republican side that believe that they should fund Charter schools equally to how they fund public schools. Raplh Arza, who is a Republican legislator and a lobbyist for charter schools believe that it is discriminatory if the state does not fund both tradition public school and charter schools. He said, “lawmakers shouldn’t discriminate against kids because their parents choose an alternative to traditional public schools and it would be unfair to give traditional schools more money, even though they still vastly outnumber charter schools” (Clark, 2016). On the flip side Joanne McCall,
“Brown vs. Board of Education” made it a federal crime to segregate children based on race in 1954. On the other hand, “Plessy vs. Ferguson” concluded that “separate but equal” was justified in America’s education system in 1896. Fifty years later after “Brown vs. Board of Education” according to author Jonathan Kozol, the school systems are run more like a separate but unequal system. Kozol states that today’s schools are just as segregated as they were before 1954 and funding is seriously inadequate for those in the urban areas where most attendee’s are African American and Hispanic. This inadequate funding has led to overcrowding, dilapidation of the schools, a decreasing number of on-site health officials, and lack of an enriching educational program. The effects of the funding situation has led to poor state standardized test scores, and an increasing number of students dropping out or taking more than four years to graduate. Today, strict military style programs hope to correct these poor outcomes. Are today’s schools being segregated to pay less for subordinate groups’ education, or is this just one person’s one-sided outtake on a matter that society has little control over? I aim to examine these accusations incorporating some firsthand experience from my dilapidating public school system.
Another major concern raised in the article is that most charter schools are located in areas where the majority of students are black and/or Hispanic. According to Julian Vasquez Heilig, a professor of at California State Sacramento and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People
America’s school system and student population remains segregated, by race and class. The inequalities that exist in schools today result from more than just poorly managed schools; they reflect the racial and socioeconomic inequities of society as a whole. Most of the problems with schools boil down to either racism in and outside the school system or financial disparity between wealthy and poor school districts. Because schools receive funding through local property taxes, low-income communities start at an economic disadvantage. Less funding means fewer resources, lower quality instruction and curricula, and little to no community involvement.
Today, charter schools and vouchers are still somewhat under debate. They are being argued in places from the local school board meetings to state supreme courts. Both are considered “school of choice” initiatives which allow parents to choose their child’s educational path outside the traditional public school system. The school voucher is a program which provides a certificate which is used to pay for education at the school of choice outside the public school system. Charter schools have been freed from rules, regulations, and statues with the responsibility of producing assured results that are set forth in the school’s charter. These (charter) schools are publicly funded. Choice is a God given
Would you want to go to a school that barely paid its teachers? A school made just for profit? That, my friend, is the epitome of a charter school. According to the National Charter School Resource Center (NCSRC), “Charter schools are independently managed, publicly funded schools operating under a “charter” or a contract between the school and the state or jurisdiction, allowing for significant autonomy and flexibility.” This means that they are free of certain laws and regulations and can try new methods. The problem with them is do they benefit America’s education system. I believe charter schools will and are worsening America’s education system. They have don’t provide for their employees and students, they vet students, and are taking away valuable dollars from public schools.
Charter schools are an independently public school that is granted great flexibility in its operations, in return of for a great accountability for is performance. A charter school is a public school of choice, which means that families choose them for their children. They operate with some type of freedom from some of the regulations that are imposed upon district schools. Charter schools are responsible for its academic results and for upholding the promises that are made in their charters. They also must demonstrate performance in the areas of academic achievement, financial management, and organizational stability. If a charter school does not meet performance goals, it may be closed. It’s important to know that here in New York they