Psychological Egoism: The Myth Of Gyges

681 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The differences and similarities between psychological and ethical egoism. Is either theory viable

The textbook states that psychological egoism is a theory according to which “all actions are done solely or ultimately for the sake of self-interest” (Timmons, 2012, p. 22). This theory advances the claim that all actions a person do are for selfish reasons, without concern for others. Psychological egoism suggests that things done out of kindness, are actually done for other gains such as to satisfy personal desires (Timmons, 2012, p. 23).
According to Shoemaker, many find psychological egoism believable; however his viewpoint is that this subsequently opens the door to the fallacious normative theory of ethical egoism. “Now as a matter of logic, this argument simply fails, for it commits what is known as the is/ought fallacy…” (Timmons, …show more content…

Glaudon presents Socrates with a posing viewpoint that the only reason people behave morally is the fear of getting caught and it is not in a person’s best interest to be thrown in jail. However, once that possibility is removed such as the Ring of Gyges, people will start to do things they really wanted to do because being ethical no longer benefits them for being unethical. Glaudon’s view is the only reason a person chooses to act morally is only because it the most beneficial versus potentially being punished, but once the risk of punishment is removed then, it is no longer in a person’s best interest to remain moral. Glaudon’s determined that a person will always do what is in their best interest therefore; psychological egoism is valid (Timmons, 2012, p. …show more content…

25). According to Shoemaker, one of the strengths of ethical egoism is its applicability. This theory can easily be applied to a variety of situations to achieve consistent moral verdicts, so long as the expected consequence of the person’s action is what is being focused on. The person will need to ask themselves if the action will benefit their best interest all the time (Timmons, 2012, p. 28). Shoemaker considers internal support to be ethical egoism’s weakest criterion, “for it looks like it would easily produce obligations at one time or another to perform actions that directly contradict many, if not all, of our considered moral beliefs” (Timmons, 2012, p. 29). An example would be is it in my best interest to steal things from a thief despite being morally wrong. Ethical egoism suggests I should steal and not adhere to the demands of

Show More
Related

  • Difference Between Plato And Aristotle's View Of Ownership

    1030 Words  | 3 Pages

    I disagree with this idea presented by Aristotle for it has often been the case that a person 's moral character has actually been influenced negatively by the possession or desire for tangible object. Aristotle’s views on ownership parallel the ideas that are presented by Glaucon in Plato’s Republic when he proposed the Ring of Gyges as a way to show that it is human nature to accept material things in exchange for a loss in morality. In this way, Glaucon destroys the notion that ownership of materialistic objects helps to develop moral character for Glaucon’s scenario shows that it is human nature to disregard morality in search for material goods. In this way, Glaucon’s argument disproves Aristotle’s idea that ownership of tangible objects helps to develop moral

    Read More

  • Ethical Theory Of Ethical Egoism

    1158 Words  | 3 Pages

    Ethical egoism is a normative ethical position that focuses morally right action that promotes the individual own self interest. It states that actions whose consequences will benefit the doer can be considered as ethical. It differs from psychological egoism in that because ethical egoism says we ought to be selfish while psychological states we should be selfish (Frankena, 1973. 18). The theory in itself says we are hard-wired to be selfish and focus on what type of actions promote use and is self serving. The moral appraisal of things assumes our curiosity, necessitates and even contentment of others should factor in a stability of what we perceive morally and what is in our self-interest. What is morally right and

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Ethical Egoism And Utilitarianism

    1135 Words  | 3 Pages

    Ethical egoism is arbitrary and puts ourselves above everybody else for no apparent reason. Ethical egoism splits everybody into two groups, ourselves and everyone else, and says that we are the morally superior. This brings up the question, why are we, ourselves, morally superior to everyone else? Failing to answer this question, means that the ethical egoist has no rational reason to choose ourselves over anybody else. So, with similar rational, it could just have been that everyone else is morally superior to ourselves. The ethical egoist seems to be completely arbitrary in this decision. This theory doesn’t even know why it is putting us, ourselves, above everybody else. One can compare this to a racist who says white people are more superior to blacks (Rachels). Several decades ago they would rationally argue that blacks are intellectually inferior and a threat to the world peace but today there is substantial amount of evidence to refute these claims. Now the racist has no reasons for the racial discriminations and white people and black people are equal, meaning that being racially against black people is arbitrary and has no rational reasoning. Indeed, ethical egoism is just as arbitrary as racism is, but once again, utilitarianism

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Ethical Egoism

    728 Words  | 2 Pages

    If one wishes to be a psychological egoist, then one needs to explain why people do certain actions that appear to be genuine acts of altruism.

    Read More

  • Republic Plato Analysis

    1600 Words  | 4 Pages

    There would be no reason to be moral because the impulses would be too overwhelming. Glaucon argues that if someone had a ring which made him invisible, then that person would be foolish not to use it for personal advantage. Hence, Glaucon is arguing for ethical egoism.He acknowledges that "all who practice it [justice] do so unwillingly, as something necessary, not as something good." (358c) He explains that the only reason that people act the way they do is because they are afraid of the consequences that they could face if they get caught. The common conception of justice in Plato's day was a social one, which involved the following of laws and conventions. Glaucon states that, for most people, "what the law commands they call lawful and just." (359) The laws of the time were ...

    Read More

  • Egoism And Ethical Egoism

    2219 Words  | 5 Pages

    • Once more, the ordinary science’ proves itself as the master of classification, inventing and defining the various categories of Egoism. Per example, psychological egoism, which defines doctrine that an individual is always motivated by self-interest, then rational egoism which unquestionably advocates acting in self-interest. Ethical egoism as diametrically opposite of ethical altruism which obliges a moral agent to assist the other first, even if sacrifices own interest. Also, ethical egoism differs from both rational and psychological egoism in ‘defending’ doctrine which considers all actions with contributive beneficial effects for an acting individual

    Read More

  • Ethical Egoism: A Critique and Defense of Altruism

    1265 Words  | 3 Pages

    Life is not a contest between each and every person, but a test. Just because someone believes that always making a decision that is in the best interest of themselves is right doesn’t mean that they are out to make the decision that worsens others around them. Personal ethical egoism is the idea that people should act in the best interest of themselves. I believe in altruism and that ethical egoism is an unacceptable theory because it’s proven to be inconsistent and incoherent.

    Read More

  • Hospers: Self-Interest And Selfishness

    1054 Words  | 3 Pages

    With the development of modern society, many people say that the society has become miserable, and people only care their own profit. The self-interest is becoming the object of attacking. Thereupon, when we mention self- interest, people always mix up the concept of self-interest with selfishness. As we all known, the idea of selfishness is, “Abusing others, exploiting others, using others for their own advantage – doing something to others.” (Hospers, 59) Selfish people have no ethics, morals and standards when they do anything. At the same time, what is self – interest? Self- interest can be defined as egoism, which means a person is, “looking out for your own welfare.” (Hospers, 39) The welfare people talk about is nothing more than

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Plato's Ring Of Gygess

    1356 Words  | 3 Pages

    When relating Plato’s “Ring of Gyges” to the culture that we live in now, he explains that persons are selfish and egoistic. The reason is that people do not always do the unfair things because they fear of being caught and harmed. As a human being, everything we do is coherent. When it comes to Cultural relativism, it is our beliefs, customs, and ethical virtue that relate to our social context. The main purpose is that most people do the right or wrong things that affects the society. The story explains the meaning behind what Glaucon is saying about his culture and what he had to go through and it contradicts his egoism.

    Read More

  • Is Justice Profitable?

    938 Words  | 2 Pages

    Glaucon attempted to prove that injustice is preferable to justice. At first, Glacon agreed with Socrates that justice is a good thing, but implored on the nature of its goodness? He listed three types of “good”; that which is good for its own sake (such as playing games), that which is good is good in itself and has useful consequences (such as reading), and that which is painful but has good consequences (such as surgery). Socrates replied that justice "belongs in the fairest class, that which a man who is to be happy must love both for its own sake and for the results." (45d) Glaucon then reaffirmed Thrasymachus’s position that unjust people lead a better life than just people. He started that being just is simply a formality for maintaining a good reputation and for achieving one’s goals. He claimed that the only reason why a person would choose to be unjust rather than just due to the fear of punishment. This is supported by the story of the shepherd who became corrupted as a result of finding a ring which made him invisible. He took over the kingdom through murder and intrigue since he knew there could be no repercussions for his unjust actions. In addition, Adiamantus stated that unjust people did not need to fear divine punishment since appeals could be made to Gods’ egos via sacrifices. Finally, Glaucon gave an example of the extreme unjust person who has accumulated great wealth and power which he juxtaposed with an extreme moral man who is being punished unjustly for his crimes. Clearly, injustice is preferable to justice since it provides for a more fruitful life.

    Read More

  • Implicit Egotism

    3254 Words  | 7 Pages

    Implicit egotism is a generally understudied phenomenon but it may play an important role in peoples’ appraisals and affect major life decisions (Pelham et al., 2002).

    Read More

  • Psychological and Ethical Egoism

    1876 Words  | 4 Pages

    Psychological egoism, a descriptive claim about human nature, states that humans by nature are motivated only by self-interest. To act in one's self-interest is to act mainly for one's own good and loving what is one's own (i.e. ego, body, family, house, belongings in general). It means to give one's own interests higher priority then others'. "It (psychological egoism) claims that we cannot do other than act from self-interest motivation, so that altruism-the theory that we can and should sometimes act in favor of others' interests-is simply invalid because it's impossible" (Pojman 85). According to psychological egoists, any act no matter how altruistic it might seem, is actually motivated by some selfish desire of the agent (i.e., desire for reward, avoidance of guilt, personal happiness).

    Read More

  • Freud Superego

    698 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...o two parts: conscience and ego ideal. Conscience tells what is right and wrong, and forces the ego to inhibit the id in pursuit of morally acceptable, not pleasurable or even realistic, goals. The ego ideal aims the individual's path of life toward the ideal, perfect goals instilled by society. In the pursuit, the mind attempts to make up for the loss of the perfect life experienced as a baby." (Stevenson D, 1966)

    Read More

  • The Ego and Its Own

    578 Words  | 2 Pages

    Ethical egoism can be a well-debated topic about the true intention of an individual when he or she makes an ethical decision. Max Stirner brings up a very intriguing perspective in writing, The Ego and its Own, regarding ethical egoism. After reading his writing some questions are posed. For example, are human beings at the bottom? Following Wiggins and Putnam, can we rise above our egoism and truly be altruistic? And finally, if we are something, do we have the capacity to rise to a level that we can criticize and transcend our nature? These questions try to establish whether or not we are simple humans, bound to our intrinsic nature, or far more intellectually advanced than we allow ourselves to be.

    Read More

  • A Brief on Consequentialism

    1564 Words  | 4 Pages

    Egoism is the act of pursuing a particular course of action that is driven by 'sel...

    Read More

More about Psychological Egoism: The Myth Of Gyges

Open Document