Prosecutorial Environment

556 Words2 Pages

Applying the above diagnostics to the NPA, it is evident that improvement and opportunity for change initiatives exist within the prosecutorial environment. According to Nadina (2011), whether change is proactive or reactive, it has to attract with it an improvement of the status quo. It cannot be business as usual. Open-minded public service organisations recognise the strengths of their work force and provide opportunities that assist to build on those strengths. The following summary identifies the areas in need of change:
Horizontal v vertical structure: With high crime rates in certain areas due to urbanisation, accompanied by the rapid expansion of cities and metropolitan regions, the prosecutorial environment has to adapt continuously …show more content…

In a learning organisation, the well trained work force should be encouraged to work with one another to find solutions rather than be constantly looking at the supervisors for directions (Allen and Sawhney, 2015).
Shared information v formal control systems: The sharing of information in a learning organisation is crucial as it enables the work force to respond quickly and efficiently in any specific situation. Information should be distributed to all to keep the lines of communication open not only internally, but also with external stakeholders within the justice value chain (Allen and Sawhney, 2015).
Adaptive culture v rigid culture: In a learning organisation each member of the work force is regarded as a valuable contributor to the imposed strategy as opposed to the current top-down approach in which the lower level official seldom has a role to play. Accordingly the empowered workforce to the strategy will also see the big picture and how various parts fit together. This participative culture encourages openness and equality, and it is geared toward continuous improvement (Allen and Sawhney,

Open Document