Pros And Cons Of Space Travel Privatization

944 Words2 Pages

SPACE TRAVEL SHOULD NOT BE PRIVATIZED
Stargaze in the night and look into the sky to explore what is out there. Imagine all the possibilities that are out there for mankind and exploration. Recently, private companies are trying to make a market out of space. Space traveling should not be privatized, because more money is being taken from U.S. citizens. Not having space travel privatization is important because it can have many effects that deal with taking away many opportunities. Space travel privatization is for launching companies from the U.S. into space. This is something that is not needed and if it does not become successful that will be really catastrophic. As claimed by Taylor Dinerman, “George W. Bush's promising Constellation human spaceflight program—which would be killed under Mr. Obama's plan—has already cost $9 billion since 2004. It is hard to imagine how the private sector can build a replacement for the spacecraft and booster rockets of Constellation, let alone a program to get America back to the moon, with …show more content…

This administration is taking money from NASA for science programs. The Obama Administration cuts make it really difficult to keep track of NASA’s programs that take astronauts to the moon and mars. So while NASA is wasting time and money on space travel privatization, more attention should be focused on space exploration. If space is not studied more that can lead to other problems. It can lead to problems like black holes, life in space that can put our lives in jeopardy, and do other harmful things. According to Lamar Smith, “The Obama administration has consistently tried to cut NASA’s space exploration budgets in order to fund increases for earth science programs”( par. 2). Since the Obama Administration is taking away money from more exploration. NASA should put the privatized space travel aside because more important things should be focused

Open Document