Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of research methods in science
Importance of scientific method
Importance of scientific method
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of research methods in science
NASA Funding The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), was booming in the late 1960 's because the U.S. invested over 4.5 percent of the Federal Budget (Bolden). Unfortunately, in the recent years the Government has slashed funding for many of NASA’s projects in an attempt to cut back on the deficit and boost the economy. Despite the plummet in NASA 's budget, the program has proved that it 's prominence in the U.S., space programs like NASA continue to face difficulty in increasing its funds. Although, NASA leads Evidently, the government doesn 't think NASA is worth more than 0.47 percent of the federal budget. NASA is being underfunded and its funding should be substantially increased to make ends meet. This trend needs history. It managed to send the first human into orbit and to the moon. The discoveries, NASA have made in the recent decades have enabled us to have more knowledge of planets and stars, and resources way beyond this planet. In another hand, reasons as to why the U.S. Government should continue to fund NASA 's space program is a huge deal today. With the ideals that American tax dollars should be spent on more important things and that companies are now able to construct their own rockets that are able to send people on excursions into space, really is what challenges government support and true betterment of Such as poverty and health-care, but in fact NASA 's funding is only a half a cent on the dollar, and the U.S. spends most of its deficit on war and other barbaric acts. About 2.9 trillion dollars are used on health-care alone (Millman). The U.S. government spends a mere $17.7 billion on NASA and spends more than 36 times that on defense $647 billion, with nearly $20 billion alone in 2011 spent on air conditioning tents. Since NASA’s Cold War glory days, the budget has gone from 4.41% of the total budget in 1966, to less than 0.45% today, its lowest ever. NASA helped to usher in a promising new future in the 1960s and it was rewarded with a rapidly-eroding budget. The U.S. should invest more money in NASA and less on unnecessary health care and military. The budget cuts are affecting our technology development. Evidently, Increasing NASA 's to 1 percent of the federal budget will not hurt the economy. But instead it would benefit it by creating jobs here on earth, especially for the next generation of American scientists and engineers. By increasing funds it would support cutting edge aeronautics and space technology innovations, education, and development that will help fuel the nation 's economy for years to
"One small step for man, one giant leap for mankind," said by Neil Armstrong as he took his first steps on the moon during the NASA Apollo 11 expedition to the moon. No man has ever been to the moon before and NASA, The National Aeronautics and Space Administration, was the first to get someone to land on the moon. NASA has had many great accomplishments in exploring the "new frontier" that have affected the United States ever since it was first created in July 1958. The idea for NASA first started when the Soviet Union launched the first satellite on October 4, 1957. United States started up its own space travel program and started to work on its own projects that would be better in than the Soviet Union's. This all started the great space race. It was a big race between the Soviet Union and the United States to see who could learn and discover the most. The United States and Soviet Union started building and sending satellites and space ships. Then they tried to see who could make a suit and ship that would be able to allow a living thing to go up in space. They tested out all of the equipment with monkeys and dogs, seeing what would work. Many animals did die in the process but by the results of their testing they were able to build suits and ships that allow human beings to go up in space. Even though they were able to create these machines, that doesn't mean that they didn't have their difficulties and dangers. Two space shuttles were crashed or blown up. There were many key factors that they had learned to fix that resulted in the crashing of those ships. They have made many discoveries and accomplishments like having the first astronauts walk on the moon.
This is because if we let them, another country can one-up us which in the end can lead to major problems for the U.S. The NASA program also gives us a whole new insight to how we see things and how we live our lives daily. For example Google Maps, which is used by many people, uses satellite that we get from having this program. However, some of the money used for this category can be taken and put into another category such as the FBI. “The FBI is the Federal Bureau of Investigation which operates field offices in 58 cities to combat terrorism and crime” (Document E).
Bill Nye, the “Science Guy,” asserts, “NASA is an engine of innovation and inspiration as well as the world's premier space exploration agency, and we are well served by politicians working to keep it that way, instead of turning it into a mere jobs program, or worse, cutting its budget.” The United States of America’s government is currently in an economic debt encompassing billions of US dollars. Unfortunately, the government has attempted to balance finances by cutting the funding for most programs, including NASA, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. NASA, in over half a century, has brought the most economic, technological, and social benefits than any other program held here in the USA, as well as any other extraterrestrial program in the world. The last thing this nation needs is the cutting of NASA finances. NASA should be receiving more funding because the Earth will not last forever and humans will need a place to live, there’s a curiosity within humans about the vast universe they live in, there is evidence to suggest life on other planets, the USA’s superpower status will be improved, and the economical income NASA brings is more efficient than any other governmental or educational program.
According to Space.com the Federal Government approved a budget of $16.6 billion for NASA in 2014. Approximately 1/3 of that will be spent on space exploration.
There are many opinions on if the Government should continue funding NASA or not. My belief is that yes, the Government should continue funding Nasa for many important reasons. One of those being is that NASA’S technology helps save new mothers, We use their inventions in our everyday lives and, NASA is far more advanced than other private companies.
First, space exploration is just too expensive. An example of the this in “The Space Race is a Pointless Waste of Money”, when it’s stated that “a $278 million package was blasted off from Vandenberg air force base then promptly crashed into the pacific.” To illustrate, it was explained that the satellite would have advanced the study of global warming, but instead sent hundreds of millions of dollars swirling down the drain. This is shown again in “Is Space Exploration Worth the Cost?”, when the author explains that just in “2007, NASA had a budget of $16.3 billion”. To clarify, $16.3 billion is and forever will be a lot of money, even if it is just a fraction of the total G.D.P. The loads of money being put towards space exploration needs to come to a cessation; however, there’s no sign of this happening soon.
A majority of people think the space program is a lost cause, a waste of money and a risk that should not be taken. These are all exceptional reasons why we should not fund the space program, however, there are more pros than cons in the fact of the matter. In 1969 Neil Armstrong took the first steps on the moon, this was one of the immense accomplishment of the space program that will be remembered for centuries to come. We want our children to experience these events just as we did When we were kids and the space program can do just that. Space program funding should be increased because of the human's need for exploration, greater technological advances and how it could improve the lives of people on earth.
If the space industry really gets going, and we start to mine asteroids and set up lunar, possibly Martian, colonies we would see the greatest economic expansion in the history of man. We are currently on that path, just at a slower pace due to budget cuts. However, with private industries like SpaceX and Virgin Galactic joining the space race, the competition to be the cheapest should serve as a catalyst to jump start the movement. As this emerging industry continues to grow, so will the need for highly qualified employees. This would fix our dilemma with, college students graduating and having nowhere to go. It would give adults the motivation to pursue higher education along with captivating the hearts and minds of young children. Children need astronauts to look up to, they need to have a goal that is right on the edge of impossible. Will Smith, a firm believer in self-worth and hard work once said, “Being realistic is the most common path to mediocrity.” It is true that many of humanity’s greatest ideas we not realistic and having that mentality impedes progress. It is sad how many people will say we are 18 trillion dollars in debt, let’s be realistic do we need to spend 17 billion on space junk? 17 billion dollars sounds like a lot until it is compared to the cost of the war in the Middle-East which will eventually total 4 trillion (Washington Post). Aside from helping America’s economy to grow, it will also improve relations with foreign countries. Just as the International Space Station united eleven countries with a common goal, many countries will want to join us and be a part of next gold rush in space. Advancing our goals in space is not just one way to improve the economy, it is the only
The main argument against space travel is that the money used could be better put on other matters. This is, in fact, very untrue. Looking at NASA’s 2015 budget of $17.5 billion, it may seem like a lot, until you realize that the US military budget for 2014 was $581 billion (5). Furthermore, it was estimated that each dollar in NASA’s budget was equivalent to 8 – 10 dollars of economic benefit (6). If an organization can bring about economic value at 10 folds the original budget, it would be logical to continue funding it, if not increasing the funds.
The human population continues to skyrocket, and the rate increases every year. Scientists say that the world population will reach 11 billion by 2100 (BBC). Overpopulation expands as a major problem across the globe. Several cities today already experience this problem. Cities like Beijing, Moscow, Shanghai, and numerous more experiencing problems like keeping up with providing enough resources and space to support their population (borgen). As the population increases, the rate of increase expands dramatically. Soon cities all over earth will posses this problem, leading to large amounts of poverty and disease. The world needs more space. Building more living space upward makes this possible, but this costs an abundance of money and cause many problems to the environment. The other option: colonize other planets. Currently, humans remain very far from this, but in every journey a person must start somewhere. In this instance, NASA is the first step. NASA has already proven to accomplish great things. A few examples: the lunar landings, missions on Mars, etc (science channel). After many years of exploration and research, humans will contain the ability to colonize other planets. This results in more space to live, enabling the human race to expand without consequences. The only way for this expansion to start is for the U.S. government to keep funding NASA. Funding NASA enables the human race to
America went to the moon with big pockets, putting forth one of the biggest and most successful investments the US government has had yet. America walked on the moon the day of July 20th 1969, we know how we got there, but how much did it cost to arrive? John F Kennedy(JFK) proposed NASA reach the moon with a total budget of “$109 billion dollars in 2010 dollars”(Lafleur 2010). These numbers include only the total cost of the Apollo program itself, not including any other missions or projects NASA had at the time. It was a colossal amount of money to pull from where? JFK described this in his 1962 speech as “More than 50 cents a week for every man, women, and child in the united states”(Kennedy 1962). Today we stand by the most advanced engineers,
Have you ever wondered if there's life outside of earth? or if we will ever travel beyond our galaxy on the other hand how about knowing when there's an asteroid coming our way.The NASA organization is trying to achieve these goals. but when it comes to the topic of NASA wanting to create new mission to explore the universe most of us will readily agree that it would be a good idea that we should explore the universe. where this agreement usually ends, however,is on the question of the problem is should the government help fund NASA for their space flight mission. while some are convinced that it would be a good idea that government should continue to fund NASA space flight mission because it’s beneficial for NASA to create new technology, citizens can learn new ways to explore the universe and find new ways to detect incoming asteroids. other believe that the government shouldn't fund NASA for their future mission and should instead fund
The 1960's brought new advancements for all of Earth. Machines and men were sent into space, and this sparked a new government agency, called NASA. Space was a new frontier, and virtually everyone was interested in exploring it. Over the years, the interest in space exploration has weakened, and NASA was almost terminated from existence, although there have been many advancements in it over that time. Space exploration should continue because it could help solve many problems on Earth, such as overpopulation and lack of resources. Exploration of the final frontier must continue in order for human life to continue.
Most people think that the costly downside to funding space exploration is a reason to avoid spending money on sciences and instead spend it on problems here on earth, but such funding for space exploration actually promotes economical as well as scientific benefits. Space exploration is an important expenditure for the high cost because of the potential for numerous benefits such as the possibility to find useful resources to cultivate, space exploration and satellites produce many thousands of jobs in our economy, and it creates and discovers newer and better technologies through research and development.
By being in a very technologically advanced era, scientists can invent revolutionary devices never thought of. NASA is doing that right now and has been doing that since it began. They are not only climbing the stairs in space exploration but in the medical industry, too. Nevertheless, they are forever changing millions of lives by using all they have discovered. Most of all, they are teaching people a life lesson, to always use the things you have for the greater good. NASA has achieved profound success ever since their start in 1958 and they will continue to make discovery and innovation their first and foremost goal for years to come.