Pros And Cons Of Right To Work

606 Words2 Pages

Right-to-Work Laws
Right to work laws are enforced in 22 U.S.states, under provisions of the Taft-Hartley Act, prohibiting agreements between labor unions and employers that require the workplace to be a closed shop. The right-to-work laws can be a huge incentive for business since owners and developers won't have to negotiate with the union. A Right to Work law secures the right of employees to decide for them whether or not to join or financially support a union. However, employees who work in the railway or airline industries are not protected by a Right to Work law, and employees who work on a federal enclave may not be.

Right-to-Work Pros
Right-to-work-defendants highlight that the Constitution provides the right to freedom of association, arguing that workers are free to join unions or refrain from joining them. Some contend that it is unfair that unions can require new and existing employees to become union members and pay costly membership dues for services they may not want or are philosophically opposed to. Proponents of Right to Work laws argue that one of the positive effects of these laws for companies is that they increase labor productivity by increasing unions’ accountability to their members. Because they enjoy the special …show more content…

It forces workers to make decisions about unionization in front of union organizers and exposes workers to intimidation by those organizers. Opponents of Right to Work like to point out that the average wage in Right to Work states is lower than the average wage in non-RTW states. Since employers in right-to-work states are not required to hire union members, the union's ability to improve work conditions beyond legal minimums is weakened when membership is outnumbered by non-members in the firm. As a result, right-to-work states have higher employment related fatalities than pro-union

Open Document