Pros And Cons Of Community Policing

769 Words2 Pages

Community policing is a philosophy that promotes organizational strategies that support the systematic use of partnerships and problem-solving techniques to proactively address the immediate conditions that give rise to public safety issues such as crime, social disorder, and fear of crime. This service is a well-known but highly underappreciated practice for police officers around the globe. There are three topics I will cover in this paper. Also, the positives of community policing will be explained. The improvements that follow in society with the assistance of the law enforcement officers conducting the community policing. First off, the presence of corruption in the ranks of many Law Enforcement Agencies. Secondly, the reports of officers …show more content…

These officers are the leading cause of corruption with Law Enforcement Agencies around the globe. These toxic intentions are rooted to the more senior personnel. They conduct community policing and show the novice officers the perks to being officers of the law. These teachings cause the newly appointed officers to inherit bad habits such as “shamming”, “flying under the radar”, meaning they are doing their job half of the time. This causes the lack of work ethics and lower moral. This corruption may not always begin at the lower ranks, it may start at the higher ranks within the agency causing a snowball effect. The novice officers are normally taken advantage of if a problem arises related to these misdoings. Sadly the new officers are either oblivious to the dangers to their careers and are possibly used as scapegoats in return for their blind loyalty. Thankfully to the sharp observations of fellow law enforcement officers, these incidents are often ceased before larger issues are …show more content…

Also note that informants were used by befriending a public civilian to obtain leverage in order to bust a drug deal or dealer. In the case, Pearson v. Callahan, 129 S.Ct. 808 (2009). Though not a widely-heralded case from this year, this case is a great win for attorneys who defend police officers in civil rights lawsuits. A confidential informant told officers that he could buy methamphetamine from Afton Callahan. The CI went to Callahan’s home and Callahan invited him into the home. After seeing methamphetamine, the CI gave a pre-arranged signal and officers entered the home. They had neither an arrest warrant nor a search warrant. During the entry, an officer saw Callahan drop what was later identified as a bag of methamphetamine. During the criminal appeal, the prosecution conceded the lack of warrant and the lack of exigent circumstances for the entry. Callahan prevailed and the Utah Court of Appeals reversed his conviction. This shows the use of informants through community policing to obtain the upper hand on

Open Document