Pros And Cons Of Caesarean Section

1398 Words3 Pages

A baby is a gift a mother and father receive after waiting for nine months. Nine months of watching as the mother’s cheeks grow rosy and her belly big. Nine months of the father planning and finally learning how to fix a crib. Nine months of arguing over the baby’s name. Nine months of waiting for that one perfect beautiful day that the wife and husband turn into mother and father, into parents. In that one exciting moment, there are many situations where the mother cannot give birth vaginal. In these type of situations, the mother and baby’s life is in grave danger. So, what other ultimatum is there to protect not only the mother’s life but also the baby’s? The best answer is for the doctors and parents to decide to perform a Cesarean section otherwise known as caesarean section or C-section. A C-section is a surgical procedure performed by an obstetrician; the obstetrician performs incisions on the mother’s stomach and uterus to take out the baby. (MayoClinic) Once performed the mother and child has a greater chance of living and building a memory galore. Since it can bring positive outcomes, Caesarean section should only be performed on women …show more content…

The differences between the two methods are the way of which the different layers of skin are cut. For example, the Joel-Cohen incision “includes blunt separation of tissue long natural planes”(Habib) while Pfannenstiel is “curvilinear incision generally concealed in the regrowth of pubic hair when correctly placed just above the pubic symphysis”(Habib). Joel-Cohen is a blunt separation of tissues while, Pfannenstiel punctures requires an incision just above the pubic symphysis. The pubic symphysis is the midline cartilaginous joint that unites the superior rami of the left and right pubic bones. The difference between these two incisions displays the outcome of physical pain a mother experiences after giving

More about Pros And Cons Of Caesarean Section

Open Document