Counselling Case Study

1432 Words3 Pages

Problem-solving approaches presented by Takahashi, Adler et al. and Ruffolo et al. have six similar steps. They all include steps of identifying the problem, analyzing the problem, coming up with some solutions, evaluating the solutions, implementing the solution in action, and evaluating the outcome of the solution. Three approaches all give a useful procedure to solve a problem in group. However, the approach presented by Adler et al. is more general compared to other two approaches. Both approaches from Takahashi and Adler et al. clearly define the problem by asking what, how, where, who and when questions, but Takahashi adds steps of identifying target system and background information at the beginning of assessment process. …show more content…

Problem-solving approach can be use in counselling, case management, casework, and psychotherapy. For instance, when a social worker provides counseling services for a second-grade student, the social worker identifies that the target system is individual, and the student is referred by a teacher. Using diagnostic assessments, the social worker has conversations with the student, and they take the first step to identify the problem. Then they clearly define the problem by asking who, what, when, where, why questions. They identity the problem is the student becomes bad-tempered, fighting with peers, and failing grades recently because of witnessing violence from …show more content…

The book divides contents in five parts with diffident colors, which help readers locate information easily. Besides adding iconography, authors include in-text questionnaires and discussion prompts, so that student can develop critical thinking after discussions. The book includes a self-assessment and a summary in each chapter for students to identify own communication styles and check their understanding for ideas or concepts. Additionally, Adler et al. incorporate cultural competence in nonverbal communication to remind people respect cross-cultural differences (144). This enhances my awareness of how to effectively send and receive nonverbal messages when I work with diverse populations in social work practice.
There is one downside of the book. Authors do not provide evaluations to strategies for effective communications in group project. Adler et al. list some strategies for reaching satisfying decisions in a diverse group, but without real life situations under these strategies, and they do not evaluate the effectiveness of strategies (280). Evaluating processes and outcomes is important for social work practice to advance their effectiveness, yet Adler et al. fail to demonstrate the process of evaluation at this

Open Document