Privatized Military Contractors

503 Words2 Pages

The Army must reduce dependence on contractors to maintain the operational readiness required to accomplish its’ mission. According to an industry study on privatized military operations the author pointed out that the overreliance on contractors potentially erodes unit core competencies as organic knowledge, skills and abilities are lost from disuse. The use of contractors in mission critical areas prevents the transfer of actual experience and self-reliance necessary for successful operations. Placing a comparable amount of military personnel who normally perform a function with the contractor will help sustain operational capacity, institutional expertise and support more effective contract oversight. The ability to assess contractor reliability against standardized metrics will significantly reduce the risk to deployed forces who are highly dependent on the contractors for mission accomplishment. …show more content…

By eliminating uncertainty and ambiguity between the contractor and the contracting officers, the government could get rid of the divergent interpretations that inflate the cost. Realizing it is to the contractor’s advantage to pass on all expenses it can to the buyer in order to maximize profits every opportunity to clarify criteria for cost, reduce disagreement, and set clear limits are necessary. The difficulty in writing a contract to get rid of all unexpected cost is evident but doing it will cut down on the confusion over the life of the agreement. Defining costs allowed and which are not along with potential penalties for delayed service delivery will yield a better

Open Document