Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of human activities on the environment
The impact of human activities on the environment
The impact of human activities on the environment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The impact of human activities on the environment
Throughout the years, the current state of our world has been slipping. The environment slyly crept its way up to one of the most ambiguous topics throughout the world. Problems from contaminated water to smog in the air, our planet is slowly dying. Everyone has contributed to the extinction of our motherland. Under such assets, the government should be compelled to enforce and regulate such actions to improve our environment. Actions speak louder than words, and therefore many communities should do something to help the environment because it shows righteousness. Though the government does whatever is can to help the environment, they should act more of a police-like figure to sustain order. Passing a law is not enough to get people to be more active in trying to preserve the environment; it is like a teacher telling a student to do their homework, but in the end it does not work. The government should be enforcing acts because the environment and its resources are not going to live on forever: “The truth of consummation is that humans will always consume natural resources” (Winters). Nothing is immortal, not even that little five inch piece of plastic that adolescents love to walk around with. At this rate, the world’s natural resources will soon start to decay, and there will be no more if no one takes action. The government administering acts upon acts trying to salvage what is left in the environment will be one step into improving the environment. Source D shows that environmentalists can minimize the costs of global warming, and it can be a valuable aid to the government. Any short term or long term solution can be supported by the government as it lowers the level of global crisis. Many people do not like to be differen... ... middle of paper ... ...ly valued because it shows that everyone cares for themselves, family, friends, and strangers. People will not have a community if people destroy the environment. Our environment is what everyone shares, and it is delicate. One wrong move and it can affect a whole area. The government fostering environmentally friendly actions is what the doctor has ordered. It is clear that ensuring that the environment is safe from being wrecked is for everyone to join forces along with the aid of the government. Combining forces to rescue the environment is good for the soul and the heart. Only by instituting environmental practices throughout the world can leave us into an optimistic world, knowing that our habitat is not being destroyed. From saving one’s own nation to the saving all the nations we all have one planet that we live on, and that planet is what people call home.
“The modern form of the word environment comes from an older word that we hardly use anymore: environ, to surround, to form a ring around, to encircle” (Stoll 3). The meaning of the word environment did not become a major factor in the lives of humanity until 1945. The tragic events that led to the end of World War II sparked a chief movement in history: American Environmentalism. Global decision-making changed as well as human unity due to the mere purpose that fate of all people and the environment became intertwined (Stoll 1). I will further discuss the dramatic attempts made by some Americans to bring the importance of preserving our environment to the surface to show if and how we have evolved.
I think it is agreed by all parties that it is an eyesore to see these people blockading the roads to prime tree-cutting land and bombarding our most respectable government with impractical proposals. It is not so Herculean a task to discourage these self-named “environmentalists” in their follies by paying them no heed. However, a new generation of them has sprung up. Citing how it is in fact profitable to protect the environment, they try to pull blindfolds over the public’s eyes. Therefore, whoever could find an easy and economically sound method of reclaiming these lost souls would deserve to be made the head of our nation at the very least.
... instead they push it aside because it isn’t affecting them immediately. I think that it is the obligation of our educators and government to help us build a society that doesn’t destroy or encourage the destruction of people and the environment. I’m not saying that this is what they are doing, but by doing nothing they might as well not be giving up on humanity and the world as a whole. The least they can do is establish rules and regulations on CO2 emissions and have academic programs in place that give everyone the opportunity to learn about waste and other factors that are affecting the planet in a negative way. With these educational programs in place nobody will be able to say they had no idea what they were doing and when the time comes to be judged for their injustices against the planet and other humans, they can be greeted with the judgment they deserve.
Potatoes are the fourth largest crop in the world behind rice, wheat, and corn, they comprise nearly three percent of all calories consumed by U.S. adults (National Potato Council 2012), and one third of them are used to produce just one product: frozen french fries. There are three sides to this staple food that now so pervades our fast food restaurants: the market, utilization, and regulation. First, the market.
While Rachel Carson’s “The Obligation to Endure”, Christopher Kemp’s "Medieval Planet", and Jared Diamond’s “The Ends of the World as We Know Them” all cover subjects relating to environmental issues, each author goes about purveying his or her message in a different manner. Kemp’s New Scientist article explains humanity’s environmental effects by imagining a world in which we never existed and hypothesizing how it would look and function with our absence. Carson’s essay depicts a frightening reality about the current state of humanity and the environment. She warns readers about how we are the only species who possess the capability to disrupt and even destroy Earth’s natural patterns. Diamond articulates his work with an unusual spin, using examples of historical civilizations that have snuffed themselves out by their own progress or poor relationship with the environment. The main message conveyed in Diamond's essay is that we are just as capable of choking ourselves out by our own doing today as were the historical civilizations that suffered the same fate. Despite their differing focuses, each article agrees that humans are outgrowing the finite amount of resources that the Earth can provide. A delicate symbiotic relationship between life and the environment has been maintained throughout time. Life on Earth was shaped by the constantly changing climate and surroundings. However, humans have gained the capacity to transcend this relationship. Through our ingenuity and industrialism, we have separated ourselves from natural restrictions. Because of this progress, we have been destroying the natural cycles of Earth’s environment and continue to do so at an alarming rate. Humanity has become Earth’s infection, ravaging the worl...
Ron Ross, Ph.D., a financial consultant and former professor of economics at Humboldt State University believes that “sustainability is a means for political liberals to expand their control over personal freedoms...” (Ross 138). Individuals who agree with Ron Ross don't want regulation for that very reason, they do not want to have their personal lives be controlled. These individuals are against regulations because they believe that so much money will be spent on a topic that simply cannot be measured and that these government programs have incentives that are not beneficial for the everyday people and the economy. In reality, it may not feel like enforcing regulations help because the change doesn't happen right away but in the long run it will be very beneficial because we will be able to save the earth from anymore damage. Without a planet we have nowhere to prosper, grow, expand, and most importantly
...lege and ability to do so must also donate money to the cause. The desire to change things must be established in order for anything to every actually change. People have to understand that by helping curb the Greenhouse Gas commissions, they are helping preserving not only everything as we know it today, but also everything for generations to come. After all, is it not our duty to help save this wonderful planet from a problem that we ourselves caused?
As a nation, it is vital that the United States of America begins to move toward a process of environmental sustainability in order to protect the prosperity of this country and the planet as a whole for generations to come. In the past, environmental legislation has been put into place in order to start to encourage a transition toward a mindset of preserving the overall well being of the planet. An example of this is the clean air act, which was implemented in 1963, and then amended in 1966, 1970, 1977, and 1990. While this has been considered a successful piece of legislation that has reduced air pollution by up to 70%, it is still not enough, as harmful emissions into the atmosphere continue to mass pollute the planet(McCarthy and Burke, 650). One of the main issues
Every day when looking out a window, people see a beautiful earth. The earth is intriguing, but hinges on a delicate balance. Many natural resources keep the grass green and the sky blue. Man has made quite an impression on our world, and has transformed the earth's resources into tools to make life easy. However, mans' manipulation on earth has become detrimental to the health of our planet and the safety of mankind. Through the use and production of resources such as oil and energy, man is gradually poisoning the earth. Pollution has become such a dilemma in society; there is no real control or a feasible solution to society's recklessness. Without complete change, our system will collapse. The earth will eventually retaliate with disaster, or corporate control of our economy will cause hysteria and depression. Evaluation of the consequences and repercussion of worldwide pollution, may give people a better idea of what the future holds.
...empts at doing our part. But what is really needed is change at national and global levels. Only by convincing leaders to create laws that improve our energy policy, and pushing companies to adopt sustainable business practices on a global level, can we see real change. (EDF - Environmental Defense Fund , 2015) We need laws, polices, and infringes…..etc. whatever it takes in order to get our CO2 emissions under control. There are plenty of ways to improve on the current state of global warming like limiting global warming pollution, utilizing renewable energy, drive smarter vehicles, or even drive less. However small the action any change in our normal day to day can still help tremendously especially when done by a large number of people. We have to remember that this is the only planet we have and global warming is a global issue that needs to be taken seriously.
Efforts to improve the standard of living for humans--through the control of nature and the development of new products--have also resulted in the pollution, or contamination, of the environment. Much of the world's air, water, and land is now partially poisoned by chemical wastes. Some places have become uninhabitable. This pollution exposes people all around the globe to new risks from disease. Many species of plants and animals have become endangered or are now extinct. As a result of these developments, governments have passed laws to limit or reverse the threat of environmental pollution.
We all belong to the same world and all of us have the same responsibilities towards the world and its environment. This fact might be hard to digest, but if we continue to pollute the Earth at the current rate, all of the world’s ocean waters will become one-hundred-thirty percent acidic. This means that the ocean will be unable to sustain most of its marine life and only a few creatures will be able to survive in the water. A big population of people think that they do not or have few responsibilities towards the environment. People think that the governor of a country should take steps to help the environment. They leave it to scientists since they have the technology to prevent pollution, or that is what most people think. There are more responsibilities to the world each individual has than most of realize. The amount of negligence and ignorance of humans towards the Earth is taking a heavy toll.
Are you aware of the detrimental impacts that we have had on our environment? Every second, the Earth is being polluted by poisonous gases, waste products and due to human activities, the world’s climate is dramatically changing. In other words, these impacts do not only harm our environment but also our health. It has been scientifically proven that air pollution causes respiratory diseases and cancer, due to the inhalation of all the harmful chemicals. Water pollution can also lead to typhoid, diarrheal diseases and other waterborne disease, due to the intake of bacteria and parasites. Many people have died due to these health-related illnesses. So why are we still living in this awful condition? Air sustains us and water is a basic necessity, so we should do what we can to prevent pollution. In short, we should protect our environment to ensure a healthy life a...
Many people assume that the environment is not in danger. They believe that as technology advances, we do not need to worry about renewing natural resources, recycling, and finding new ways to produce energy. They state that one person in the world does not make a large difference. In reality, each individual's contribution greatly affects our environment. Our natural resources are slowly disappearing, and we must work together to save them and the Earth from ruin.