Plain Error In Court Case

626 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Cases affected by mapp vs ohio in a negative way

Plain error can help a substantive right angle in the defense for the introduction of improper presentation. In the battle of inadmissible evidence a jury trial will be deemed necessary for the case. The jury case will ultimately provide the possibility of any evidence to be thrown out and therefore should take notice to plain error. The main predominance in this case suggest that even though evidence was found to be exclusively vital to the case it can also be legally fought for the evidence to be inadmissible. For example, Mapp v. Ohio (1961) 236 “police officers forced their way into Dollree Mapp's house without a proper search warrant. Police believed that Mapp was harboring a suspected bomber, and demanded entry. No suspect was found, but police discovered a trunk of …show more content…

The exclusionary rule will also be exercised to this case and may be executed during trial. The exclusionary rule will help provide an alternate introduction in order to help prosecution as the opposed secondary use of Habeas corpus will reexamine his case in the event of an appeal provided he plead to the charges under the introduction of a conditional plea if prosecuted by the use of relevant evidence. In order to make his appeal and as a legal assistant I would create also ensure the abundance in forward mobility by a subpoena in order to have alternative solution for a much needed case success. Compulsory process will be needed in order to show just how applying prima facie and the fifth amendment will work together to develop ,construct and impose striking arguments to the exclusionary rule. Law of evidence will help assertion in the jury case and help limit the narration or rebut in during their

Show More
Related

  • Robert Taliento Case Study

    711 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Petitioner filed a motion for a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence disputing that the Government was negligent in disclosing a purported promise of leniency made to Robert Taliento, their key witness in exchange for his testimony. At a hearing on this motion, the Assistant United States Attorney, DiPaola, who presented the case to the grand jury admitted that he promised the witness that he would not be prosecuted if he testified before the grand jury and at trial. The Assistant (Golden) who tried the case was unaware of the promise. The defendant seeks to overturn his conviction on the grounds that this non-disclosure was a violation of his Due Process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast United States V. Leon

    716 Words  | 2 Pages

    The concurring opinion was given by Justice Blackmun. He agreed with the majority opinion that the exclusionary rule is valid as long as the officer and magistrate act in ?good faith?, but he wanted to stress that it is not a rule to take lightly, that it may change with how cases such as this are handled in the future. (United States v. Leon ,

    Read More

  • The Casey Anthony Trial: The Trial Of O. J. Simpson

    1077 Words  | 3 Pages

    Reasonable doubt plays a significant role in this particular case, as it requires a standard of unsurpassable evidence in order to be able to convict the plaintiff in a criminal proceeding. This is required under the Due Process Section in the Fifth Amendment of the American Constitution, allowing a safeguard and circumvention

    Read More

  • False Confessions and the Norfolk Four Case

    2738 Words  | 6 Pages

    Kassin, Saul, and Lawrence Wrightsman (Eds.). The Psychology of Evidence and Trial Procedure. Chapter 3. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1985. Print.

    Read More

  • Trial Lawyers Cater To Juror Hsieh

    249 Words  | 1 Pages

    Have you ever noticed the newly advanced ways evidence is being presented in courtrooms today? Well, in the article “Trial Lawyers Cater to Jurors’ Demands for Visual Evidence” by Sylvia Hsieh, she discusses why jurors are insisting for visual evidence, how visual evidence can be used in almost all cases, and the challenges that come along with using visual evidence. In fact, jurors are demanding for this type of evidence to get a better understanding of what happened during a crime scene and sometimes vehicle accidents. Lawyers are more comfortable using paper, words, and arguments to bring evidence but jurors feel that visual evidence will bring entertainment into the courtroom. Lawyers are actually hiring visual artist, graphic designers,

    Read More

  • The Importance Of The CSI Effect

    871 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...ons of jurors. When evidence cannot be provided prosecutors must find convincing methods to let the jurors understand why they are unable to do so.

    Read More

  • Final Exam: Two Courtroom Cases

    1449 Words  | 3 Pages

    Dan Locallo is a very contradicting man. When he began his career as a prosecutor he was anything but polite to the defense lawyers. Locallo himself describes himself as “kind of an asshole” towards defense lawyers (Courtroom 302, 59). During his time as a prosecutor, Dan Locallo became intrigued by the opportunity to become a judge. When Steve Bogira asked Locallo why he wanted to become a judge, his reply seemed simple. Locallo claimed that he never wanted to become a judge because of a “power-trip” he does claim that “the power of attraction was a great influence” (Courtroom 302, 59). However, Locallo admits that the real reason why he wanted to become a judge was because he would have the “ability to make decisions, to do justice” (Courtroom 302, 59). As a judge, Locallo seems to express three different personalities, which tend to change depending on the current case at hand. His personalities are being compassionate judge, being an understanding judge, or being a hard-nose tough judge. Each of these personalities are not only determined by the case, but also by whether Locallo will profit on the long run; whether or not he will get reelected as a circuit judge at the end of his term.

    Read More

  • Stages Of The Criminal Trial Scott Peterson

    1322 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the opening statements both side of the case make opening statements to lay the foundation of their cases. Opening statements are not allowed to be argumentative and cannot be considered evidence by the jury; they are the road maps laying out where each side intends to take its case. First the prosecution presented its case. They alleged Peterson killed his wife in their Modesto home because he was having an affair, then drove her body nearly 100 miles to San Francisco Bay and heaved it overboard from his small boat. Prosecution offered a steady drum beat of small bits of circumstantial evidence. From the Russian poetry Peterson read his mistress to the fishing gear in his alibi to the dessert featured on a particular episode of Martha Stewart Living, it added up to Peterson's guilt, they suggested. The defense countered that Modesto authorities unfairly targeted Peterson, ignoring important leads that didn't fit their theory. Defense said that, while prosecutors had only assembled a circumstantial case, they had five witnesses that were direct evidence of Peterson's innocence.

    Read More

  • Case Law, The Most Important Sources Of Law

    1940 Words  | 4 Pages

    When it comes to follow the actual case, the defence of duress might be accepted, however, obiter dicta deny it. Like this case shows, obiter dicta are not compulsory to be followed, though still it is fundamental in terms of deciding the judgement. The great reason of having the judicial decision is to be fair to every cases. Reflecting or applying the previous cases to the similar cases, it will enable to prevent the judges from having different and unfair judgement. Judicial decision works with several points. Like it mentioned already, if the case is similar to previous precedence, it will apply to it in the same way. However, before that process, the judge will distinguish if the law should be applied on that or not. In addition, if necessary, as a privilege of higher courts, they can overrule what lower courts have decided already. It should make sure not to disrupt the respect toward lower courts. In addition, if the lower court interprets the law wrongly, the decision will be reversed by the higher courts. All these rules can be summarised as the doctrine of precedent or the doctrine of stare decisis. There

    Read More

  • Essay On The American Court System

    2361 Words  | 5 Pages

    ...’ testimony at trial. This rule has played a big role in the American system like in the case of Mapp V. Ohio. Ohio police officers had gone to a home of a women to ask her question about a recent bombing and requested to search her house. When she denied them access, they arrested her and searched her house which led them to find allegedly obscene books, pictures, and photographs.

    Read More

  • Forensic Evidence Admissibility For or Against in the Bloodsworth v. State Case

    1944 Words  | 4 Pages

    In this position paper I have chosen Bloodsworth v. State ~ 76 Md.App. 23, 543 A.2d 382 case to discuss on whether or not the forensic evidence that was submitted for this case should have been admissible or not. To understand whether or not the evidence should be admissible or not we first have to know what the case is about.

    Read More

  • Analysis 12 Angry Men

    2109 Words  | 5 Pages

    In modern times and times of old, court cases do not always hold up the idea of reasonable doubt. The case in Twelve Angry Men was almost a case in which reasonable doubt was not explored fully. The jury found the man guilty before examining the evidence and making a decision. The exploitation of reasonable doubt is something that extends beyond the crime drama. This is a scary thought, one of the major ideas of the court system isn’t always being upheld.

    Read More

  • Demonstrative Evidence And Circumstantial Evidence

    974 Words  | 2 Pages

    This form of evidence needs to be unobjectionable, fair and must accurately recount the witness’s testimony. The probative value of the demonstrative evidence should sufficiently prove something, without creating prejudice in the jury’s minds that would result in an unfair trial for the defendant. Examples of this form of evidence include diagrams of the crime scene including location of physical evidence, position of the victim, sketches, charts, maps, models, reenactments, and other visual aids (Hinderaker & McFarland,

    Read More

  • The Issue of Bad Math in Court Discussion

    912 Words  | 2 Pages

    Bad math in court is something that happens over and over again and because of it, many innocent victims have been jailed and punished unjustly over the years. The problem is not some sort of miscalculation, but the refusal of the court to recalculate. More than often enough, the judge refuses to reexamine the collected DNA in an investigation case. What the people of the court fail to realize at times is that probability is not a one off thing, it is something that should be repeated at least more than once and can even be repeated over and over again. The flipping of a coin is frequently used to explain this logic and will be explained in following paragraphs. Sometimes statistician will state that there is only a one in a million chance (or some other ludicrously large number) that the defendant is innocent; but then they fail to examine: what is that 1, what are the chances that the accused that that one in a million? In this paper, I will be discussing the issue of ‘bad math in court,’ why it happens and how something as simple as probability can get innocent people out of jail.

    Read More

  • Presumptions, Standards Of Proof And Burden Of Proof

    2205 Words  | 5 Pages

    The outcome of a trial, whether it be civil or criminal, can have a tremendous impact on the lives of the parties involved. It is the wish of any reasonable person that the perpetrator of an evil faces the penalties of his or her actions while the innocent be awarded a favorable outcome, whatever that entails. This is the outcome that any honest legal decision-marker strives to achieve. If the all the relevant facts were readily available and their authenticity assured, then a judge or jury could confidently reach a verdict knowing that the outcome is consistent with the actual events that took place. This is not to imply that knowing the facts assures a just ruling, but only that no confusion exists as to what actually took place and therefore the verdict reflects what actually took place. In a great number of cases the choice between innocence and guilt is not clear cut, yet a decision must be reached nevertheless. It is often the case that the trier must make a decision based upon an incomplete and unsatisfactory picture of events. The judge must also acknowledge the possibility that the plaintiff or defendant is lying in order to have his or her way. How does a judge reach a verdict when there is no way he can know, based on the facts, who is guilty and who is innocent? These are questions of tremendous importance. The answer to these questions has a deep impact in the shaping of our society. Questions regarding the presumptions of innocence, the standards of proof and who is to carry the burden of proof will be addressed. Emphasis will be place upon cases in which the rules we are about to discuss are overturned by some other principle.

    Read More

More about Plain Error In Court Case

Open Document