Developmental dyslexia is classified as a learning disability, particularly focusing on impaired language-based learning. It is a syndrome with a neurological origin and it exists on a spectrum with varying in severity and symptoms. The neurological basis of dyslexia is not well understood, however, research has demonstrated its origin in the left perisylvian area. (Ramus 2003, Eden et al 2016) Children with dyslexia struggle with processing writing (orthography) and sound structure of words (phonology) of languages.
This research is intended to analyze the transcript of a child’s speech. The target child is a female named Majorie who is 2 years and 3 months old. The transcript is from The Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. The linguistic aspects that will be examined are the phonological processes of the child including speech errors, syllable shapes, and her phonetic inventory consisting of manner and place of articulation. Included in the analysis will be her stage and development of lexical knowledge and what words she uses.
Introduction
Writing treatment for aphasia using phonological training works best when speaking nonsense. Either nonsense or Italian. Six writing treatment studies demonstrate that research for phonological training treatment is at Phase II. Such treatment would be in a Phase III level of evidence if the studies reviewed had quasi-experimental studies or closer examinations of efficacy. Phonological writing treatment is still in Phase II as illustrated by these three similarities in research efficacy: first, how inconsistent procedures in research obscure a standardized research protocol; second, how irrelevant outcomes confuse data; and third, how the lack of clearly defined participant characteristics mar research results.
Strand, E. (2000). The Efficacy of Integrated Stimulation Intervention with Developmental Apraxia of Speech. Journal of Medical Speech Language Pathology, 8(4), 295-300.
A case study of a ten year old girl with DS was given EPG therapy in order to resolve a phonological process of velar fronting. The study showed changes in the accuracy of the contact between the tongue and artificial palate over 14 weeks. Training with the visual feedback allowed the child to alter her tongue placement and generalize it to conversational speech (Wood, et al. 2009). As a result, she had fewer articulation errors and her intelligibility significant improved.
Paden, E.P. (1994). Otitis media and disordered phonologies: Some concerns and cautions. Topics in Language Disorders, 14(2), 72-83.
Fluency shaping therapy is a direct approach of stuttering and its basic goal is to achieve fluency, prolonged speech as well as connected speech. This therapy technique trains stutterers to speak more fluently by controlling their phonation, breathing and articulations. The results are described as monotonic, slow and fluent speech. When there are improvements the client is transferred to speak in daily life outside the speech clinic. Modification therapy which is another direct approach focuses on modifying stuttering so that the stutterers are less effortful and easier for the client. The goal of stuttering modification is to avoid behaviours, fears and negative reactions or attitudes when stuttering to decrease tension (Guitar & Peters 1980). Fluency shaping focuses on helping the child to speak more fluently by working with speech motor control skills (Sidavi & Fabus 2010).
The following is a summary of a journal article titled, “Is Parent -Child Interaction Therapy Effective in Reducing Stuttering?” by Sharon Millard, Alison Nicholas, and Frances Cook. This article was published in the Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research in June 2008, to report the findings of a research conducted on the effects of parent-child interaction therapy approach (PCIT) on children who stutter. It was conducted to add more research and evidence to the efficacy of using the PCIT approach (Millard, Nicholas, & Cook, 2008 p 636).
Gretz, S. (2011). Apraxia: Speech Therapy in Toddlers and Young Children - Apraxia-KIDS . Apraxia-KIDS (a program of The Childhood Apraxia of Speech Association) - Apraxia-KIDS. Retrieved November 20, 2011, from http://www.apraxia-kids.org/site/apps/nlnet/c ontent3.aspx?c=chKMIOPIIsE&b=78844 &ct=464229
Common co-occurring speech-language problems include language delay, literacy problems, and pragmatic issues. Common sensorimotor issues include motor delays, limb apraxia, difficultly feeding, and either too low or too high oral sensitivity (“Childhood Apraxia of Speech”). Children who are bilingual may present with some of the characteristics of CAS, including differences in prosody and inconsistent errors for phonemes that are not present in their first language. It is important to differentiate between between these features and the features of CAS to avoid