Philosophical Worldviews

459 Words1 Page

Philosophical Worldviews (Epistemology)
Any research problem in social, behavioral and human sciences conforms to some philosophical assumptions and a specific epistemological stance which influence and guide research practice (Crotty, 1998; Creswell, 2015; Patton, 2015). According to Crotty (1998), epistemology “provide(s) researchers with a sense of stability and direction as they go on to do their own building; that is, as they move towards understanding and expounding the research process after their own fashion in forms that suit their particular research purposes” (p. 2). In other words, we as researchers, need to have a good knowledge about multiple epistemologies that underpin any educational research in, social sciences (Bryan, 2012). …show more content…

This philosophical worldview is widely used in qualitative research.
The transformative worldview is politically oriented, and it seeks social justice, and better lives for indigenous and minority groups who are oppressed in their countries. This worldview encourages collaborative work with members of these communities to build knowledge based on their experiences. This worldview conforms with the believes of qualitative researchers in cultural studies programs (Creswell, 2014)
Unlike quantitative and qualitative epistemological worldviews, the pragmatic worldview holds the radical middle epistemological stance (Patton, (2015). In other words, it does not conform its worldview to either quantitative and qualitative worldviews, instead it believes of the coexistence of both quantitative and qualitative epistemological worldviews and the use of quantitative measures and qualitative life stories to have a good understanding of the research problem. The pragmatic worldview is widely used among mixed methods researchers. As far as this study is concerned with investigating vocabulary strategies by using quantitative and qualitative research methods, the pragmatic worldview was adapted in the context of this study. I believe that there is not only one way in which we understand and interpret the meaning and knowledge in the world (Crotty,

Open Document