Phil 102 Argument Analysis

755 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Animal cruelty research essay

PHIL 102 Argument analysis I
Yifei Li
NetID: yifeili3
Premises:
1. It is always wrong to cause any animals with conscious suffer.
2. Torturing puppies bring suffer to puppies.
3. Torturing puppies is cruel.
4. Torturing puppies is wrong.(from 1, 2, 3)
5. Farm castrates pig without anesthesia and cut off its tail.
6. What the farm does causes animals suffer. (from 5)
7. Torturing puppies is as cruel as torturing other animals.
8. What the farm does is also wrong. (from 1, 6, 7)
9. It is wrong for anyone to own a farm that torture animals. (from 8)
10. There’s no difference between people torturing animals themselves and paying someone to do it.
11. paying farm to torture animals is wrong. (from 9, 10)
12. Purchasing meat from …show more content…

The first sub-conclusion is that torturing puppies is wrong and the second sub-conclusion states that it is wrong to purchase meat from farm. All other premises are served to provide necessary support for these two sub-conclusions.

From the article, it can be inferred from the author that causing any animals being in great suffer and such behavior is wrong. Further, torturing puppies brings suffer to puppies and it is cruel and inhuman. Therefore, torturing puppies is obviously wrong.

Similarly, farm castrates pigs without anesthesia and cut off their tails, which therefore cause the animals suffer. Since farm cause animals suffer and torturing puppies is as cruel as torturing any other animals, what the farm does to animals is clearly wrong.
Hence owning a farm that does this sort of things to animals is wrong. Moreover, there’s no clear difference between someone doing something than paying other to do the same thing. So paying farm to torture animals is wrong. Also, because purchasing meat from farm is paying other money to produce meat and because farm produce meat in a way of torturing animals, purchasing meat from farm is also a way to torture animals, The article thereby reach its second sub-conclusion: it is wrong to purchase meat from

Show More
Related

  • Argumentative Essay: We Must Eliminate Animal Testing

    613 Words  | 2 Pages

    There is a moral blind spot in the treatment of animals that enable us to justify the cruelties for the perceived benefits of humans. Animals are living things. They have lungs which breathe, hearts which beat, and blood that flows. In fact, animals sense of smell, sight, and sound is much more acute than our own. Therefore, we can assume that their sensitivity to pain is at least equal to ours. According to Hippocrates, “The soul is the same in all living creatures, although the body of each is different.” This can go with the Duty Theory that states that every individual gets treated the same. The intentions of animal testing is not to harm the animals, but that is exactly what it does.

    Read More

  • An Analysis Of Gary Steiner's 'Animal, Vegetable, Miserable'

    947 Words  | 2 Pages

    Throughout the last century the concern of animals being treated as just a product has become a growing argument. Some believe that animals are equal to the human and should be treated with the same respect. There are many though that laugh at that thought, and continue to put the perfectly roasted turkey on the table each year. Gary Steiner is the author of the article “Animal, Vegetable, Miserable”, that was published in the New York Times right before Thanksgiving in 2009. He believes the use of animals as a benefit to human beings is inhumane and murderous. Gary Steiner’s argument for these animal’s rights is very compelling and convincing to a great extent.

    Read More

  • Cruelty of Puppy Mills, a Speech Outline

    1060 Words  | 3 Pages

    Propositional Statement: Puppy mills are inhumane because they produce puppies that have health defects that could possibly lead to their pain and suffering as well as death. It is very important that the public be educated on the harm that puppy mills have on animals. There should also be more rules...

    Read More

  • Factory Farmers: America's Very Own Bullies

    3876 Words  | 8 Pages

    “We take care of animals, and the animals take care of us.” (Rollin 212). The preceding phrase is a policy that American farmers in the old west lived their lives by. Modern farmers live do not live their lives anywhere near to this phrase because they own factory farms, and the whole reason for having a factory farm is to fit as many animals in a small space as possible in order to maximize profit. Factory Farms, or Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFO) first appeared in the 1920s, right after Vitamins A and D, because if animals are given these vitamins in their diets, exercise and sunlight are not necessities for the animals to grow anymore (In Defense of Animals 1). The growing number of factory farms is coupled with the decreasing population of rural areas, which means that many people are beginning to factory farm because it yields a higher profit (“Agricultural Sciences” 170). In the 1950s, the average number of chickens on a given egg farm in the United States was 100, but now the average number is a shocking 10,000 chickens (“Factory Farms” 4). The reason for the increase of chickens has to do with new and cheaper technology developed just after World War II. The new technology increased the number of chickens, while it had the opposite effect on dairy and meat cows, their numbers went in the other direction. The number of cows used for milk was cut by more than half between 1950 and 2000, because farmers discovered new and more efficient methods for milking cows (Weeks 4). Many activists for animals’ rights are concerned about the methods used by factory farmers because they confine their animals into tight spaces and since there are so many of them in a small ...

    Read More

  • Arguments Against Factory Farming: Alastair Norcross's Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases

    918 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Alastair Norcross’ paper, “Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases” he describes a situation in which a man, Fred, has lost his ability to enjoy the gustatory pleasure of chocolate due to a car accident. However, it is known that puppies under duress produce cocoamone, the hormone Fred needs in order to enjoy chocolate again. Since no one is in the cocoamone business, Fred sets up twenty six puppy cages, and mutilates them resulting in cocoamone production in the puppy’s brains. Each week he slaughters a dog and consumes the cocoamone. When he is caught, he explains to the judge and jury that his actions are no different from factory farming because he is torturing and killing puppies for gustatory pleasure similar to how factory farms torture and kill cows, chickens, etc. for other people’s gustatory pleasure. You, the reader are meant to think that this is unacceptable, and therefore, denounce factory farming. Although there are many valid objections to this argument, I am in agreement with Norcross and shall be supporting him in this paper. I think the two most practical objections are that (1) most consumers don’t know how the animals are treated whereas Fred clearly does, and (2) if Fred stops enjoying chocolate, no puppies will be tortured, but if a person becomes a vegetarian, no animals will be saved due to the small impact of one consumer. I shall explain the reasoning behind these objections and then present sound responses in line with Norcross’ thinking, thereby refuting the objections.

    Read More

  • Factory Farming in the U.S.

    624 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the United States alone, nearly [9] billion farm animals are consumed annually, and the vast majority of them are abused in ways that would cause you to go to jail for.... According to non-profit advocacy group Farm Forward, in the last 70 years cruel, factory farms have grown to the point where they produce more than 99 percent of the domesticated farm animals raised to provide food in the United States.... Three main systems are most exceptionally cruel, gestation crates for pregnant pigs, veal crates for calves, and battery cages for laying hens.... Most animals can’t move because of the tight, cramped spaces causing malnutrition in the bones. [Imagine staying in one spot for the remainder of your life cramped in a pen, or even...

    Read More

  • Ethical Treatment Of Animals Essay

    449 Words  | 1 Pages

    A. This is people that torture and abuse these poor, vulnerable animals and it should be

    Read More

  • Is Animal Testing Wrong

    990 Words  | 2 Pages

    Imagine not having a choice and being used for experimenting without having any say at all. For everyone, this seems like a horrible nightmare; for animals this nightmare is their reality. It is unethical to sentence animals to life in a lab cage and to intentionally cause them excruciating pain. Industries even cram multiple animals at a time in a single cage where they are all subjected to food and water deprivation, forced feeding, forced inhalation, and long periods of phsycial restraint. Through the process, animals can be burned, poisoned, given diseases such as cancer, blinded, paralyzed and brain damaged. According to Humane Society International, most are even encountered with inflictions of burns and other wounds to examine the healing processes. Also with pain to study its effects caused from these experiments. These animals are rarely offered any form of pain relief, and in some cases, may be left to suffer until they eventually die. The poor, traumatized animals used in experiments are treated like nothing more than disposable lab equipment. Like humans, they can feel pain and fear. Just because they don't have the same abilities as humans doesn’t mean their life has any less value to them. That’s why these helpless and defenseless animals should stop being taken advantage of. The world does not need another mascara, shampoo, or household cleaning product so badly that it should come at

    Read More

  • Animal Abuse Essay

    640 Words  | 2 Pages

    Should animals have to go through pain and suffering? Should they have to go without food and/or water? The answer is no. Animal abuse happens everyday and it happens because people are barbarous or because they don’t know how to take the best care of an animal that they have. Whatever the reason it’s still not right and will never be okay. This paper will cover a brief history of animal abuse, the statistics, the signs of animal abuse, and what can be done to stop animal abuse. Animal abuse needs to end for the animals that can’t speak for themselves.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Animal Food

    764 Words  | 2 Pages

    For instance, the Humane Society of the United States, the nation’s largest animal protection organization, shared a report they did on the welfare of confined farm animals, “… 283 million egg-laying hens are reared in barren, wire battery cages so restrictive that the birds cannot even spread their wings.” (The Humane Society, 2) But the cruel living conditions doesn’t end there. The Humane Society continues to explain that more than 5.8 million pigs are used for breeding, and the majority of breeding sows are confined to two feet wide gestation crates, which are narrow enclosures that prohibit the pregnant animals from even turning around for nearly the entirety of their pregnancies. (The Humane Society, 2) A human rights and social injustices journalist for the New York Times, Nicholas Kristof, goes off to explain some inhumane butchering practices for poultry. Kristof points out, “… almost nine billion chickens will be dangled upside down on conveyor belts and slaughtered; when the process doesn 't work properly, the birds are scalded [or dumped in excruciatingly hot water to be de-feathered] alive.” (Kristof, par. 3) If it weren’t apparent that this was a method of butchering poultry, then one might assume this to be an immoral torture method; therefore, if it’s immoral to be done to a

    Read More

  • Farmed Animals And The Law

    1354 Words  | 3 Pages

    Each year, 10 billion animals, not including fish, are raised and killed each year for food, but did you know that an overwhelming 99% of them are raised and killed on factory farms? A factory farm is a place where animals are packed into spaces so tight that they can hardly move. They are forced into cages so small that the animals can’t even turn around. Many of these animals have no access to the outdoors and they spend most of their lives in cages or pens. This type of treatment can cause severe and mental distress. Many would agree that this type of treatment is animal cruelty, but why are there so few laws to protect these animals? Every year, animals raised for meat, dairy and egg industries are among the most abused in the United States. Many of the abusive tactics used on farm animals would be illegal to do to dogs or cats. These farm animals are inhumanly slaughtered, tortured and killed. In some cases before these animals get to the slaughter house they suffer brutally cruel treatment that has been legal for the most part. One of these practices is of shoving a pipe down the throat of a duck or goose to force feed the animal several times a day. One example of the abuse that goes on inside these factory farms is a practice called 'debeaking'. It is a process that involves cutting or burning through bone, cartilage and soft tissue to remove the upper beak of chickens, turkeys, and ducks. These animals are not even given anesthetics. These farm animals are also deprived of exercise so that all their bodies’ energy goes toward producing flesh, eggs, or milk for human consumption, fed drugs to fatten them and keep them alive in conditions that w...

    Read More

  • The Unseen Cruelty: A Critique on Animal Testing

    1045 Words  | 3 Pages

    Hurting an animal is better than hurting a fellow human being right? Well imagine a child being ripped away from his mother in today’s society, for no reason. Would that be considered okay, or kidnapping? Imagine humans being forced to breed, just so their children can be tortured for makeup or a new facial wash. Would that be considered okay, or morally incorrect? People do not see animals as fellow living things, because they do not have the power to say no like a person can. They can’t stand up for themselves, leaving the people of the world to do it for them. Seeing that there are other ways to test out consumer products, why harm defenseless, breathing, loving, beings? With all things considered, animal testing “has no place in science today” (Goodall, 1).

    Read More

  • Animal Rights: The Abolitionist Approach?

    1030 Words  | 3 Pages

    The article mainly focuses on this issue, not mentioning the aspects of animal rights. The authors argue their points well but can have counter-arguments against some

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Animal Abuse

    1130 Words  | 3 Pages

    “There can be many reason for animal cruelty, like any other form of violence, is often committed by a person who feels powerless, unnoticed, or under control of others. Some who are cruel to animals copy acts what they have seen or that have been done to them, others see harming an animal as a safe way to get revenge against--or threaten-- someone who cares about that animal”. (“Animal… Statistics”) Concerns towards abusing animals have gone up in the past. Although there are not many cases on animal abuse, many have occurred. Abusers are charged with Criminal Animal Abuse and then sentenced to life in prison. Some animals that are physically abused are sometimes rescued by Animal Control, and are taken it to an animal shelter. However, many shelters have not had the space to keep the animals so the workers would have to put them down (Carol Roach). Researchers have shown that the main animals getting abused are dogs, chickens, horses, and livestock (“Animal...

    Read More

  • Analysis Of An Animal Place By Michael Pollan

    1023 Words  | 3 Pages

    Michael Pollan presents many convincing arguments that strengthen his position on whether slaughtering animals is ethical or not. He believes that every living being on this planet deserves an equal amount of respect regardless of it being an animal or human, after all humans are also animals. “An Animal’s place” by Michael Pollan is an opinionated piece that states his beliefs on whether animals should be slaughtered and killed to be someone’s meal or not. In his article, Pollan does not just state his opinions as a writer but also analyzes them from a reader’s point of view, thus answering any questions that the reader might raise. Although Pollan does consider killing and slaughtering of animals unethical, using environmental and ethical

    Read More

More about Phil 102 Argument Analysis

Open Document