Persuasive Essay On Prescribed Fire

599 Words2 Pages

Prescribed fires are a well debated topic. While many people support them because they "help prevent" more wildfires, and they are "controlled," I see from a different point of view. There's a reason most building don't allow smoking within a certain distance of the building. Many people don't like it and it can damage their health. Same thing with prescribed fires. They add more pollution to the air we breathe. I know a lot of people support these kinds of fires because the help control fuels, but there are other ways.

Prescribed fires are used to clean up the dead plants that will produce harmful fuels after a wildfire. The problem with these fires are even though these fires are supposed to be controlled, they can get out of hand. May 20, 2016, a prescribed fire in Minnesota escaped and burned more than what was planned and continued unstopped for a few days. Firefighters finally were able to put a stop to it. This has increased in the United States quite a bit this year. The acres burned by escaped fires are forty-six percent above normal. Unlike what many think, prescribed fires are not always watched. Sometimes, they will be left for a couple days with no one checking on them. How do they expect to keep them controlled when no one wants to control them? …show more content…

The reason for this is we have been having more wildfires then ever before. A big contribution to the natural disasters of this world is the ecosystem. When the air is highly polluted, the risk of things like wildfires rise. We are only raising that risk by adding more pollution to the air with prescribed fires. These fires are dangerous. They are starting to get out of control too often. By trying to reduce the risk of wildfires, we are only creating

Open Document