Performance measurement systems (PMS) have been around for some time and even though it is typically used by businesses, measuring performance is something people do on a regular basis. Measuring performance involves setting goals and developing a plan to achieve the desired results. Part of the planning processes involves determining how to measure performance as you work towards a goal. Measuring progress provides information that can be used to make decisions to continue, improve, or eliminate activities in your plan. Just as a report card assesses how well a student has performed and identifies areas where further growth can be achieved, PMS serve the same purpose in the business world. PMS give organizations feedback on the elements they measure, which helps management determine areas where they have performed well and identify those that need improvement. “As financial and accounting people, we have the opportunity to support our organizations’ efforts towards continuous improvement by creating performance measurement systems that provide relevant, factual information on core business processes and key activities” (Miller, 1992). The key objective of a PMS is to help guide management in understanding, managing and improving their business processes while reducing costs.
Managing costs involves continuously improving processes used throughout the organization in an effort to make them as efficient as possible, whereby reducing costs. As the business world has evolved due to changes in the economy, global competition, technology, and environmental factors, so has the need to develop a new approach to measuring performance. According to Baldwin and Clark, “a good portion of America’s competitive decline is due directly to man...
... middle of paper ...
..., J A (April 1992). The new activity performance measures. CMA - the Management Accounting Magazine, 66, n3. p.34(1). Retrieved January 16, 2011, from Academic OneFile via Gale:
http://find.galegroup.com.proxy.davenport.edu/gtx/start.do?prodId=AONE&userGroupName=lom_davenportc
Rucci, A J, Kirn, S P, & Quinn, R T (Jan-Feb 1998). The employee-customer profit chain at Sears. Harvard Business Review, 76, n1. p.82(16). Retrieved February 05, 2011, from Academic OneFile via Gale:
http://find.galegroup.com.proxy.davenport.edu/gtx/start.do?prodId=AONE&userGroupName=lom_davenportc
Vitale, M R, & Mavrinac, S C (August 1995). How effective is your performance measurement system?. Management Accounting (USA), 77, n2. p.43(5). Retrieved January 16, 2011, from Expanded Academic ASAP via Gale:
http://find.galegroup.com/gtx/start.do?prodId=EAIM&userGroupName=lom_davenportc
[1] Noreen, Eric W., Brewer Peter C., et al., Managerial Accounting for Managers, Second Edition, McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York, NY, 2011.
Tapinos, E., Dyson, R.G. & Meadows, M. (2005). The impact of performance measurement in strategic planning. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 54(5/6), 370-384.
‘If you can’t measure it, you can’t management it’, [Dan vesset and Brian, M. 2009]. Performance management is concerned with the measurement of results and with studying progress to achieving objectives base on the results. Managing performance can tell you what you’re doing well in, and also reveal areas where you need to make adjustments. Measuring performance tells you how far you’ve gone achieving your ultimate
Garrison, R. H., Noreen, E. W., & Brewer, P. c. (2010). Managerial Accounting. New York: McGraw Hill/Irwin.
“Using PM System doesn’t improve the performance of an organization. PM system incorporates of not only evaluating performance appraisals but also rewards. As quoted by Sheridan (2009) and Latham (2005), “the cultural maturation of performance based can take decades to implement and requires the organizations to allocate the required resources”. Technology plays a pivotal role in future of PM systems where e-monitoring of performance of employees in Hilton and other entities respectively can change the evolution of performance management thus bringing necessary and important changes to stay competitive in the market as well increasing an individual’s productivity in the company (Sheridan & Latham, 2005)”.
The notion of the Balanced Scorecard was described as "a framework for multi- dimensional performance evaluation and performance management." This framew...
An organization costing system is a system that helps the management with the strategy planning while the system plays an important role in providing accurate cost information about the products and customers (Curtin, 2006). UPS utilizes the Activity-Based Costing (ABC) system. ABC assumes that activities cause costs and that cost objects create the demand for activities (Marx, 2009). The key to cost allocation under ABC is to identify the activities that are performed to provide a particular service and then aggregate the costs of the activities (Gapenski, 2012). This is a marked departure from the practice of sharing overheads costs equally or overheads becoming part of the overall profit-loss estimate instead of component product pricing (Nayab, 2011).
Before the introduction of the balanced scorecard tool, only financial measures were used to determine the organi...
Bacal, Robert. Manager's Guide to Performance Management. 2nd ed. Vol. 1. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2012. Print.
Boulder County Public Health (BCPH) is a public organization that has five divisions with over 200 employees responsible for delivering numerous programs to the community, which protect and prevent individuals from harmful diseases (Boulder County, 2011). Their mission is: “Boulder County Public Health shall protect, promote, and enhance the health and well-being of all people and the environment in Boulder County (Boulder County, 2011, ¶ 1).” In an effort to standardize the employee evaluation system across all five divisions, the organization developed a standard performance management system in 2005. According to Aguinis, there are fourteen characteristics that form an ideal performance management system and Boulder County Public Health’s performance management system will be evaluated to see which of these characteristics their system has.
Life is all about setting goals and trying to achieve them. The same theory also applies in the managerial industry. The accomplishment of desired results in a business is called performance. One of the major concerns of the top managers of a firm is the actual performance of the firm so its measurement is unavoidable.
Performance management is a useful and powerful tool that can be used by managers to identify what areas of their organisation they need to improve to increase the organisation’s overall performance. The idea of a balanced scorecard enforces a sensible distribution of resources and effort across all aspect of performance an organisation is, or should be, concerned with.
Kaydos, W. (1991). Measuring, Managing, and Maximizing Performance. (Pg. 38) Cambridge, MA. Productivity Press, Inc.
In management accounting, cost management has a crucial role and finds its foundations in understanding “cost behaviour”. “Cost behaviour analysis” can be defined as “the study of how cost changes when there is a change in an organisation’s level of activity”. (Definition https://www.accountingcoach.com/blog/what-is-cost-behavior).
Performance measurement is a process many companies, organisations, schools use today. Performance measurement refers to the process of determining results and outcomes from certain processes, products and services which allow evaluation and analysis of the goals, standards, past results. Its main role in management is that it allows to make the most out of available resources, improve decision making, improve how administrations operate and to see to see whether output are in line with what was intended or should have been achieved. While performance measurement is a very common and systematic process and has many advantages, it also has some disadvantages.