Pay For Women In Sport Essay

Issues analysis

Why are women denied pay equity in professional sporting competitions?

The humanitarian battle for pay equity and feminist ideologies of gender reformation remain controversial in all domains, yet why in an increasingly modernised industry is it existent? Consumerism impacts the limited funding and opportunities presented to women to further promote their personal continuation and success. Few argue that the biological incompetency women possess incapacitates their ability to compete at the similar standard of fellow male competitors: therefore justifying the difference in recompense. Whilst others argue that humans, unrelatedly to gender, ought to be reimbursed equally for the same labour.

Professional men’s leagues/competitions have established extensively large fan bases, enabling companies to further promote and manipulate consumers. Female sporting professions, with the exception of very few, struggle to gain the same investments due to preconceived theories regarding the difference in intensity and standard. Individual endorsements are presented to both genders, but are more readily accessible to male competitors subsequent to popularity. The ability to award both genders, in the same profession, equal pay is often unmanageable as a result of funding differences. Similar situations irrespective to gender also

This factor restricts women from grasping the same standard of athleticism. Men often compete at a higher standard of play exhuming greater physical exertion, this then supposedly qualifies them for a higher wage. In various professional tennis competitions men are expected to complete five sets if necessary, whilst women are required to complete three due to a higher expectation of stamina. In situations as recently described, a wage of greater expense is often rewarded as the quantity of sport played is