Parson's Sick Role

674 Words2 Pages

Parson’s sick role is a description of social expectations for the sick individual (Freund et al., 127). This model is useful in some roles, but also has theoretical weaknesses. This essay will briefly describe the sick role and its weaknesses by introducing a counterexample. I will challenge the usefulness of the sick role through the disease Type 2 diabetes and describe why it would not apply to this sickness. The expectations within the sick role are: 1) It was not the individual’s intention to get sick so they are not held responsible, 2) The sickness is a legitimate reason to be excused from normal obligations, 3) Being excused is permissible so long as the individual intends to get better, and 4) Getting better means seek and cooperating …show more content…

The temporal issue with the sick role is that illness can be acute or chronic. Acute is a short-term ailment, whereas chronic is often a lifelong illness the individual must learn to cope and adapt with (Freund et al., 128). With chronic ailments being long-term, it knocks the balance off the model in part of the illness making the deviance a permanent resident that the individual is often partly to blame for. Voluntarily accepting the sick role is not always apparent because both the patient and a provider must be in mutual agreement on the prognosis (Freund et al, 130). Some social factors, such as the ability to afford care or to avoid negative stigma associated with an illness, may disrupt this mutual understanding by discouraging the individual to reject or deny their reality. These factors can also correlate in the variation of legitimacy of a sickness based on social class or job sector. With the points regarding theoretical weaknesses, it can be applied to Type 2 diabetes as an example of how the sick role would not be applicable to this …show more content…

This illness falls under as a lifelong condition a patient must continuously manage. Often times, patients may be held partially responsible for this condition based on their dietary intake and daily lifestyle. While a mutual understanding can be established between the individual and their care provider, legitimacy for deviance can be complicated. Based on their socioeconomic status, a diabetic individual may face the challenges of being unable to maintain care whether it is due to high medications costs or produce costs at the market. Substantial work hours or other daily obligations may not allow a balanced incorporation of health management into someone’s life until their condition worsens. These factors illustrate how Type 2 diabetes is not easily described using Parson’s sick role because of its various complexities on a diabetic’s life that is not readily accounted for in the

Open Document