Paradox In One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest

786 Words2 Pages

Consider this: the two people most likely to become the next US President (Hillary

Clinton and Donald Trump) each have disapproval ratings above 50% (Fournier). That

means that no matter who wins, most Americans will be dissatisfied with their leader. This

is worrisome for American democracy; however, such a state of affairs is not entirely new.

Chuck Palahniuk, in his foreword to One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, asks, “how can you

live in a democracy that expects you to participate, to hold an opinion and vote...but at the

same time...follow the will of others if even the slimmest majority disagrees with you?”

(Palahniuk ix). This, he argues, is the central paradox that the novel explores; however, for

people like Ken Kesey, who railed …show more content…

The fact that Pete must be silenced “so the meeting can continue”

means that his contributions are not seen as relevant. He is disregarded as background

noise – indeed, one must “go” to silence him, suggesting distance between him and the

meeting. Moreover, the Nurse does not speak to him directly; rather, she sends an unnamed

“somebody” to “hush him up.” Even Bromden uses dismissive terms (“wigwags that

copper-pot head”) to describe Pete’s attempts to be heard. As such, Dr. Spivey’s description

of the Therapeutic Community (the approach to therapy utilized in the hospital) mirrors

the tragic state of American democracy. Spivey explains that the goal is to make the

hospital “as much like our own democratic, free neighbourhoods as possible” (44). By this

he means that everyone gets a voice, but the ironic truth is that everyone who conforms

gets a voice. Pete cannot conform even to mainstream mental illness; his problems are too

far beyond the expertise of the hospital staff to be worth discussion in a democratic forum.

This links him to real-world countercultural figures, as well as the very needy, who find

little satisfaction in the status quo and who are habitually left unaccounted …show more content…

People are not genuinely given a voice;

Muldrake 3

rather, they are coerced into revealing what they would prefer not to, and in the process

they undermine their own credibility and, ultimately, silence themselves. All the while,

Pete, who “said something that was real and true and important” that “put all their childish

hollering to shame” is ignored (45). From a modern perspective, this valuing of appearance

and spectacle over substantive debate is, sadly, very familiar.

Democracy may be the best foundation on which to build a society, but to glorify it

as perfect is clearly naive. Kesey’s depiction of the silenced countercultural figure with no

representative (and no hope for a representative) is a tragic reminder of something that

many Americans were acutely aware of in Cold War America. Today, the problem is

intensified by the many distractions from important issues that obstruct the selection of

credible candidates. It may still be possible to engage in democracy in a meaningful way;

the challenge is to find a way to get into the meeting, as opposed to pointlessly sitting

outside of it moaning about how tired you

Open Document