Ozymandias Vs Bequette

597 Words2 Pages

Bequette focuses on the two Ozymandias sonnets and points out the areas between the two sonnets where he feels Shelly’s version has stronger meanings and the interpretation and in the end succeeds Smith’s version. Bequette uses the research method of compare which “takes two or more contrasting cases that can be examined to highlight differences and similarities between them, leading to a better understanding of phenomena.”3 His article focuses on the comparison of the Ozymandias sonnets by two poets. From the beginning Bequette shows that Percy Shelly’s version is superior over Horice Smith’s by showing us that Shelly’s sonnet has more detail to it and specific points to back his opinion. Bequette begins his comparison by pointing out to the readers that through the decades Shelly’s sonnet has been showcased through time; while Smith's sonnet was his only published work. ‘Shelley's version has been frequently anthologized in high school books, while Horace Smith’s has been noted, but not put into print since his publication’2. This fact supports Bequette’s foundation for his argument that one sonnet is more popular than the other and gives a little historic background. After his introduction of the two sonnets, he places both sonnets in the beginning of his paper. This lets the readers have access to go back and reference the sonnets and see what Banquette is comparing and see from him view point. …show more content…

Bequtte implies that for Smith to have a good sonnet he might copy, but this is not true because Bequette still writes favoring Smith's writing. This gives Smith a bad name, but is a strong fact to show that Shelly is better

Open Document