Failure In Othello's Failure

1264 Words3 Pages

least. To contribute to his overall vulnerability, Hamlet continues to make rash decisions without getting the facts. From killing Polonius to eventually causing the deaths of the entire royal family, Hamlet shows his friends and subordinates that he makes his choices based on his emotions. This ignorance and overall weakness becomes the layout for all of Hamlets choices, thus eventually leading him to his own demise. Next, Othello 's ignorance and overall poor decision making shows just how bad of a leader he really is. Like Hamlet, Othello 's position and status is supposed to be one that exemplifies power and the person’s ability to lead those around him. Looking at his battle performance alone, one can say that Othello is a great …show more content…

Othello never actually considers consulting anyone (besides Iago) on what to do about anything. He leaves himself open to manipulation, and thus makes himself an easy pawn to the actions of his own subordinate. Othello 's pride clearly takes over when he says "yet she must die, else she’ll betray more men"(5.2.6). This shows just how weak he really is, he is willing to take actions just because he "thinks" he is been betrayed. When Othello 's honor is put on the line, he proves to be at his weakest, he acts on whatever comes to his mind and doesn’t think about the possible consequences. The irony is that honor and pride are traits that contribute to all warriors, especially a general. But, Othello’s own pride turns out to be one of his greatest impediments. He kills his own wife and slaps her in public all in the name of his own personal …show more content…

Once Hamlet learned or even suspected that Claudius murdered his father, he should have prepared for anything. Instead, Hamlet enters a deep personal reflection on morals and what is right and wrong. This gives an opening for Claudius, who says”And for his death no wind of blame shall breathe/ but even his mother shall cunchange the practice/ and call it an accident”. Despite the rather clear evidence Hamlet has gathered of Claudius’ corruption, Hamlet’s lack of action and emotional breakdown opens himself up to easy manipulation. As his madness becomes apparent to all those around him, he allows himself to be sent to England despite the obvious that Claudius is plotting something. He should have known that his enemy knows the truth and fortunately, barely escapes death. As time passes, it’s clear that Hamlet is losing all sense of caution in rationality when he decides to have a fencing match with the man who already tried to kill him. All of the actions taken by both Claudius and Laertes clearly show there intent to kill, but Hamlet becomes obnoxiously trusting. Although being trusting of others isn’t a bad quality, it is definitely not something you want to take up with your enemies. Hamlet’s overall lack of motivation to defend himself becomes too apparent, he had many opportunities to win this war of deception, but caused his own

Open Document