Orly Goldwasser The Alphabet Summary

884 Words2 Pages

Orly Goldwasser makes the claim that the alphabet was invented by Canaanites who were directly influenced by Egyptian hieroglyphics. He suggests that Egyptian hieroglyphics made it possible for the alphabet to be invented. She explains that the Canaanites likely used hieroglyphics as models and taking small sections of the pictograms and using them in a way to represent sounds. She clarifies that he thinks it’s likely that for some of the letters, they used objects from their own world as models instead of hieroglyphics. She further argues that these Canaanites were not sophisticated scribes, but rather were illiterate, based on his belief that they could not read hieroglyphics. She takes this position based on his observations of letters …show more content…

While both arguments are logical and based on evidence that could prove either true, Goldwasser gives a better picture and a more clear explanation of his hypothesis. Additionally, Rainy makes claims which are simply assumptions that not based on factual evidence such as when he states “It is obvious that the original pictorial forms of the alphabet must have been written on dozens, hundreds, of papyrus sheets that have not survived.” He does not, however, provide any explanation for how he arrived at this conclusion and what makes him believe to be absolute fact. In addition, Goldwasser, provides a response for each of Rainey’s points by providing a clear explanation with evidence and pictures to illustrate and support his claims. For example, in response to Rainy’s argument that the consonants of the alphabet from a life too sophisticated for pastoral nomads and mining laborers, Goldwasser provides a list of identified in the emerging alphabet such as a fish, the head of a bull, a hand, water, a snake and an eye. All of these signs, he explains, reference the everyday and spiritual work and not the sophisticated life identified by

Open Document