Organizational Policy And Governance (Opg)

1187 Words3 Pages

While servings as the Deputy Director of Organizational Policy and Governance (OPG), within the office of the USPTO CIO. One of the duties of the directorate is the operational oversight of all USPTO systems and applications. This oversight is independent of the application development directorate and the infrastructure support directorate, to ensure a check and balance exist. When I first came on board in 2012, the major patent and trademark applications were experiencing serious issues with design reliability and operational issues at the infrastructure level. Concurrently during this timeframe, OPG had been assigned the task of holding business review meetings with leadership of Patents and Trademarks. These meetings were requested by the …show more content…

The CIO’s staff did a very poor job of coordinating among themselves and with the customer. I could see that customers were becoming exasperated at the amount of outages, which impacted the overall revenue of the agency. On average, one hour of downtime cost the agency around a million dollars. I decided that I could alleviate some the concerns via a better, but controlled communication path on the operational aspects to the customer. I first met with customer leadership and documented their major concerns with the CIO. I was surprised to find out that one of their biggest concerns was communication about the current operational state of their applications. They claimed that the CIO did not share that information and some of the information was secret and only for the CIO. In my position as deputy director, I oversee a group that monitors all systems for their operational status, and their sole job is to keep the CIO leadership informed of the status of applications and networks. This group is called C3. It was this group’s communication to the CIO that the customers were referring to as secret. In response, I met with the CIO and asked him to agree to let the C3 share some of the information with the customers and he …show more content…

The COO runs the mission for the command and has the power to approve or deny funding based on mission needs. I often briefed him on the status of Cyber Security as he shared cyber security operational role with the CIO. My directorate executed a broad range of functions and one of them was, for a brief period of time, my assignment as the Chief Technology Officer for the CIO. Since the COO was suspicious of the CIO, my job was much more difficult in dealing with him and his staff. The COO was very connected and his influence went beyond the Army and out to the other services. The CIO asked me if I could win him over or find an equitable way to deal with him. Most Army Generals are type A personalities and this one was not an exception to that rule, and using a little physiology, my first action was to schedule weekly operational meetings to generate face time. I then quickly tried to find something personal that we had in common, with him and as luck would have it, the COO was also a commando. A trick I learned as a detective, I seized on this knowledge and took the opportunity to tell him that at one point in my life I was a Special Weapons and Tactics

Open Document