The ownership of a firearm should not be illegal when most gun owners are law-abiding citizens who use guns in a responsible manner. Our country’s founding fathers ratified the second amendment as a part of our Constitution in order to protect citizen’s right to bear arms and to be prepared for foreign invasion. However, currently the views on gun ownership are beginning to differ even more in urban and rural communities across America because of how each society is individually affected by the use of firearms. Many Americans who rely on concealed weapons are women and even families while some Americans are not yet permitted to keep a firearm like school staff and store owners. Also many sheriffs across the United States oppose gun control because it takes away the right of innocent citizens to self-defense. Gun control is an unconstitutional attempt at disobeying the Second Amendment, which was written to keep our country’s militia armed and to give the defenseless a fighting chance against corrupt criminals.
Public Opinion on Gun Control The twentieth century was a time of many political assassinations and violent shootings. A nation in shock mourned the deaths of President John Kennedy and civil rights leader Martin Luther King, Jr. At the end of the twentieth century the nation endured rising rates of violent crime, with young people frequently involved as victims and perpetrators and often armed with guns. Between July 1992, and June 30, 1999, there were 358 school-associated violent deaths in the United States, including 255 deaths of school- aged children, or about 51 such violent deaths each year.
Within the United States, gun control has been identified as a major issue for many years. Many government officials have portrayed gun control as a way to reduce criminal activity. The governmental view is to take guns away from individuals. In fact, this form of control dates back to the pre-Revolution (Gettings & McNiff, 2013) During this time period, gun control legislation was designed to keep firearms away from African Americans, which in turn, triggered issues with discrimination (Gettings & McNiff, 2013). The discrimination and type of gun control continued even after the Civil War. Around the end of the 19th century, gun control changed focus. Gun control legislation focused heavily on being anti-immigration (Gettings & McNiff, 2013). Later on in history; another gun control law was enacted and was known as the, Gun Control Act of 1968 (Vizzard, 2013). This particular law was aimed at reducing crime by removing guns that were inexpensive and banning them (Vizzard, 2013...
Many government officials believe it is their right to control the use of firearms in our country. Many civilians believe it is their right to bear arms to protect themselves and their families. This has been a very controversial issue over the past recent years. Especially since Barack Obama was inaugurated. Sandy Hook Elementary school shooting really set a fire underneath the feet of liberals to secure more gun control laws. Is it really effective to take away guns from law abiding citizens? What about the gun running by the gangs and cartel? Who will take their guns away? Will the ATF? It’s nearly impossible to completely shut down organized crime such as the cartel. When guns are taken away from people who possess them merely to protect themselves, what will happen then? Let’s take a look at the much bigger picture here.
As we examine the way firearm control supporters are anticipating upholding weapon control, you may begin to even address why we might even think about utilizing such monotonous methods. The thought that constraining the span of a magazine or managing the sort of firearm you can buy or actually doing something as basic as a personal verification will stop homicides like the Connecticut shooting from happening is outrageous. In Making Gun Control Happen the writer, Patrick Radden Keefe, composes as a backer to firearm control. He demonstrates that one conspicuously clear change might be to "order a criminal personal investigation for all firearm buys" as it would clearly prevent lawbreakers from getting their active a weapon (Keefe). It takes brains to carr...
“I believe in 2nd Amendment, but not war weapons on streets”, quoted President Barack Obama ("Barack Obama on Gun Control", n.d., para. 3). The debate on whether stricter gun laws will help deter crime has gained much attention since crime rates started to increase. Many research studies show that stricter gun laws are very effective at inhibiting crime. Arguing on the affirmative side, stricter gun laws will help deter crime by banning ownership of military-style assault weapons, by banning weapons with high-capacity magazines, and by creating new gun regulations that delays the process of gun ownership while significantly limiting weapon access at the same time. If stricter gun laws are incorporated into the system, we will be able to envision a bright and crime-free future ahead of us.
“I don’t believe people should be able to own guns. (Obama)” This said prior to Obama’s presidency, in the 1990’s, is still a topic that is constantly questioned today. Many American’s feel the need to seek ownership of weapons as a source of protection; While others believe that private ownership of guns will do nothing more but heighten the rate of violence due to people taking matters into his or her own hands. Philosophy professor Jeff McMahan agrees with Obama’s statement in regard to the ownership of guns. In his New York Times editorial titled “When Gun ‘Control’ Is Not Enough,” McMahan provides evidence to support his theory of the dangers that quickly follow when allowing the community to own guns legally. McMahan, throughout the text, shows responsible reasoning and allows the reader the opportunity to obtain full understanding and justifies his beliefs properly.
"Gun Control Facts." By James D. Agresti and Reid K. Smith. Just Facts, September 13, 2010.