I’m sitting in class, its 11:25, and two more minutes until my favorite part of the day. The bell rings, the class rushes out, I briefly think about the poor souls that have second lunch and must wait another hour until they eat, however that thought passes quickly because I’m at my lunch table with all of my friends pulling out my sack lunch. While many of my lunch buddies wait in line to get school lunch, usually some nachos, a burger, or pizza, some of us also pull out a sandwich and snacks from home and start chowing down trying to make the most of our half hour off from learning. We often times catch up about high school drama, play games on our phones, and interact with all the other students at lunch, occasionally not to our pleasing. But most lunches we have fun and we leave feeling full and ready for our next class. Many high schoolers however, believe that they should have the privilege of going off campus to get lunch. This is called open campus lunch, most high schools, have closed campus lunch which is much to the chagrin of the upperclassmen, …show more content…
In her Let’s Move! Campaign the main goal was to combat childhood obesity, which is a major issue in the United States with one in five children being obese. Part of the initiative was to provide healthy food in schools and improving student’s access to healthy food options. While yes, McDonald's does offer salads most high school students that go there for lunch will order a cheeseburger or Big Mac to tide them over until the end of the day. Now, Michelle Obama’s campaign did not necessarily take the good food out of schools, it just required them to be healthier. For example, at my school there is still pizza, burgers, nachos, and many other options but they have more nutritious ingredients like whole wheat bread, less sodium, and accurate portion
Wandering kids. Bumper to bumper traffic. Drug dealing. Is this the picture drawn when local students have fifty minutes of freedom during lunch to do whatever they please? Students should not be allowed to leave their school campus during lunch. An open campus would lead to truancy, disturb local businesses and neighborhoods, and cause crime.
Schools are spending too much money with this program that could be spent on other benefits for schools. Rather than using the money to get students new technology or property it 's wasted on a lunch program that students do not enjoy nor want to purchase. In the Article, “School Lunch Food is Not Fresh, Students Say” Journalist Audrey Levine interviews high school students about they feel about their school lunches. “It’s way too expensive now, but I’m still buying,” said senior Stephanie Huang. “And I don’t think more people are bringing lunch because
Most students would love to have off-campus lunch, just like many other students at other schools or in other countries do. If the other schools in the country offer an open-campus lunch, why can’t the Oak Creek High School student body also have an open-campus lunch? With certain restrictions, policies, and rules set, the student body and faculty of Oak Creek High School should be allowed the privilege of an open-campus lunch program. So if the student body is responsible and capable of handling these privileges, why can’t the Oak Creek High School student body and faculty also have an open-campus lunch?
For the majority of high school students having the option to go home for lunch or to go somewhere to eat would be the ultimate dream. High school students do not think about the dangers and worry that open campus lunch would cause for staff and parents. They do not think about the small sum of students who would spend that time doing drugs or making messes at local businesses. There would also be an amount of students who would not return, or they may be late returning to school due to traffic at fast food places. Faculty would also have the fret of an increase of car accidents caused from the limited time students would have to go wherever and get back before their next class. On the other hand, students would learn responsibilities and time management. Parents would be forced to give their children money to eat out. Along with the money on their school lunch accounts, or they would be apart of the free lunch school program. Schools cannot have open campus lunches
Some of Michelle Obama’s most important achievements include improving lunches in schools, starting programs to get kids more active, and inspiring children to continue their education past high school. She has done a lot to address child obesity and education. According to Letsmove.Gov, “In 2009, First Lady Michelle Obama planted the White House Kitchen Garden on the South Lawn to initiate a national conversation around the health and wellbeing of our nation. That conversation led to Let's Move!, an initiative launched in 2010 dedicated to helping kids and families lead healthier lives.” Let’s Move has transformed the school food environment, encouraged kids to be healthier, and promoted healthier eating to children all over the nation. Michelle Obama has also started the Reach Higher initiative, which inspires children all over the world to
The scenes shown in movies about lunches are way different than the truth of lunches. A common perception of a high school scenery, is the presence of cliques. In movies there is always that one group of “populars” that rule the school and everyone wants to be like them. The “populars” tend to be attractive and good at sports.
Why can’t we leave campus for lunch? I would enjoy being able to leave campus for lunch. I think that we should be given the right to leave campus for lunch. Even tho it may not seem right to the principle or the school board I choose to believe we could be trusted to leave campus for lunch everyday. I have also learned that our school is a completely closed campus meaning that you can’t leave the school the entire day.
When I was in high school, several Juniors and Seniors had their own cars to go wherever they wanted. However, the school administrators and school district were very strict on students skipping class, leaving school for lunch, and family or friends bringing food for students to eat during lunch time. In this day an age, a lot of teens are mature enough to drive, vote if they are 18, hold down a job, watch R-rated movies, and even marry in some states. Since teens are trusted with doing those factors they should be trusted enough to leave campus for lunch and decide whatever food they want to eat. Therefore, open campus lunch should be allowed because it allows for students to develop into mature adults, students will appreciate a varied diet,
Do School Lunches Have a Negative Impact on People? Schooltime could be a hard time for most teenagers. They need to be fed well for them to function throughout the day. In the cafeteria, the smell of pizza and burgers gets the eye of the stressed students. Sitting down looking at the tray of food all you could see is an unappetizing meal that barely meets the nutrition requirements.
The article, “Getting the kids to eat healthier school meals” it states, “...Students are disgusted by the food provided to them. According to the GAO report, students in one district refused to eat school lunches for three weeks. Students are posting their anger over the program using Twitter” This shows how students will go on ‘strike’ if not provided healthier options. To add on, healthier options will limit calorie intake and provide better drinking options.
While nutritionists praised the changes, local students were not so pleased. School lunch participation in the district dropped by the thousands, and school administrators said many students were simply throwing away their milk and entrees.” This evidence supports the reason that students would be able to purchase a more appetizing lunch because it shows that students would prefer more unhealthy food options than the healthy food that cafeterias are forcing students to eat, and even though the cafeterias want students to eat healthier food, the plan is not working because students just choose to throw away their lunches instead. Allowing students to purchase off campus lunch would solve their problem of having to eat a disgusting lunch. But wait!
Seniors are admired by underclassman as well as instructors and other staff individuals. Seniors have been given chances to mature and get to mature over their secondary school years. (Have been given the chances and get to be developed is awkward as well), Despite the fact that they are being prepared for college, they are still treated as those freshmen and sophomores they once were. Seniors could demonstrate their obligation levels (if) secondary schools (would release)would release seniors to go off grounds (to go off campus) for lunch. Astonishing long lines, associates breaking, little time to eat and insufficiently appetizing food are frequently utilized while portraying an ordinary secondary school cafeteria.
High school provides the formation for not only education, but for personal growth. Open campus lunch is basically the ability to leave school property during the lunch period. Statistics show that “nearly 1 in 3 high schools are allowing open campus during lunch” (Mieszkowski, “Open-campus policy eats away at school nutrition effort”). Allowing students to leave the campus for lunch can also provide a few benefits. A few of those benefits include: healthier food options, a break from all the classes and teachers, and it puts trust and responsibility on the students to return to class after.
Ironically, “in search for funds to encourage sports and exercise after school, schools are contributing to the problem of obesity by providing vending machines that dispense sugar and fats” (Lee). Schools are providing vending machines and meals that are not up to standards for the food regulations. Students are able to “purchase unhealthy snacks and drinks from cafeterias, school stores, or vending machines in nearly ninety percent of public schools in the United States.” Today schools are having trouble with funding which intrigues them to find ways to help. This includes schools choosing popular products “based more on what will make money as opposed to what is healthy” (Quattlebaum).
As a result of only selling healthy food at cafeterias the school will have to pay more money to be able to sell healthy food as it costs more than the standard cafeteria meal. in addition to all this, it will encourage students to purchase