On Being An Athiest By H. J. Mcclosich Analyssky

629 Words2 Pages

The article “On Being an Athiest,” by H.J. McClosky, was very interesting. McClosky basically lets us know that as atheists they do not believe in God and why they do not believe in the God that theists do. According to McCloskey, there are three proofs for a theist to believe in God; the cosmological, teleological, and the argument from design.
McCloskey refers to the arguments for God as “proofs” and he suggests that we cannot establish a case with these “proofs”. After watching the PointeCast presentation I somewhat agree with this. “Proofs” as we call them, were not designed to be one hundred percent. blah blah said that proofs are more proving facts such as in mathematics. However, in the presentation it basically says that proofs per say should be thrown out and we should use, “the best explanation approach,” which is fdskafds. Let’s take a closer look at the cosmological argument.
In the cosmological argument, McCloskey argues that the “mere existence of the world continues no reason for believing in such a being” (McCloskey, 1968). McCloskey is telling us that God can’t just exist because the world does. First let’s talk about the being. A necessary being is someone that we do not need to have a detailed explanation of. So in fact, there must be some evidence that tells us where in fact the world came into existence right? It tells us Genesis 1:1 (NIV), “in the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.” Clearly this is telling us that the cause for existence is God and He is the creator of the world. Evans lists the key elements for these arguments for this are: “some contingent being exists, if any contingent being exist, then a necessary being must exist, so therefore, there exists a necessary bein...

... middle of paper ...

...they are first born they don’t have a clue how to do anything. They soon learn that when they cry they get things. When they are developing we are here to help guide and direct them. We help teach them how to walk, eat, and talk. However, if we did not help guide and direct our children and we just had them and didn’t help them learn and grow then they would be in serious trouble, just as Aquina says. McCloskey also argues in his article that evolution has displaced the need for a designer. 590 C
McCloskey also argues that the presence of imperfection and evil in the world argues against “the perfection of the divine design or divine purpose in the world” (McCloskey, 1968). In remembering what we discussed over the cosmological argument, the argument does not anything about the design of creation or the world being perfect or having imperfections.

More about On Being An Athiest By H. J. Mcclosich Analyssky

Open Document