More handpicked essays just for you.
What is the importance of character development in literature
Now and then character analysis
Now and then character analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Creon: The Rational Ruler
In Oedipus the King, Creon uses his rationality to connect with Oedipus. Throughout the play, he provides calm leadership that pushes Thebes through the drama. Creon, the brother-in-law of Oedipus and brother of Jocasta, is a character with high authority but little responsibility until the end. Unlike the rest of the people, Creon is much more forgiving and supportive of Oedipus. Additionally, he is never seen overwhelmed despite the drama going on in his own home. In the face of power, rather than letting his selfish needs take control, Creon focuses on his family. He doesn’t resort to argument and blaming others as he understands it will only lead to further conflict. Instead, he uses quick thinking to force characters
…show more content…
He doesn’t tell Oedipus upfront that he is wrong, but rather leads him to the ultimate realization. After Oedipus accuses Creon of trying to take control of Oedipus’ thrown, Creon, rather than arguing, responds by asking Oedipus to trace back and explain why he makes these assumptions. After Oedipus traces back and refuses to take back his initial remarks, Creon explains that he would never “choose to rule and fear rather than rule and sleep peacefully, if the power were equal in both cases” (585-587) confirming he is satisfied with his current position. Creon could’ve responded by saying Oedipus is unfit for king, but rather has Oedipus find it out for himself. In Creon’s position, he is no danger of losing his reputation and yet he has all of the powers of a king; therefore, he is able to lead neutrally. As they argue, Oedipus continues to reject Creon’s innocence. Finally, Oedipus admits he wants to kill Creon for his own interest. Creon responds by explaining that Oedipus “should think equally” (629). Creon understands what ruling means. He knows not to put self interest first. Creon’s responses are portrayed as calm and controlled. He doesn’t raise his voice, but rather responds to Oedipus’ claims. Creon forces Oedipus to think and realize he’s unfit. Creon illustrates Oedipus’ flaws to the audience. The audience is …show more content…
At the end of the play, after Oedipus’ fate is clear, Creon enters. Rather than boasting his new position, Creon explains to Oedipus that “I’ve come not so that I might laugh at you nor taunt you with evil of the past” (1423-1425) illustrating that Creon takes the high road. He is a decent man and explains to the attendance that “it is most decent that only kin should see and hear the troubles of kin (1429-1431). He chooses that even after the wrong that Oedipus did, even he deserves to deal with his punishment without the people of Thebes watching. In this scene, it is difficult to remember Creon’s relationship with Oedipus. He doesn’t act like Oedipus’ brother-in-law, but rather as a leader. Although Oedipus accused Creon of attempting to steal the throne, Creon understands he must do what is right in the situation. In a time where Jocasta is dead and Oedipus is facing punishment, Creon is able to keep a straight head. He acts as a savior of Thebes. Without him, there would be no order and control. He provides organization for the situation. Similar to when Creon and Oedipus argue, Creon does not scold Oedipus but rather does what needs to be done. Unlike Oedipus, Creon never speaks out towards people as if he is above them. Instead, he speaks on their level as their
...e next king, however, he offers the crown to whoever can solve the riddle instead. When Oedipus solves the riddle, Creon willingly hands over the throne and Jocasta’s hand in marriage. This shows that Creon is not power hungry and truly wants what is best for the city. The reader can see that Creon is trustworthy and doesn’t go back on his word, which also supports why he needed to punish Polynices, even after he was given reason not to.
Creon starts off being reasonable and understanding with the power he holds. For example, when Oedipus accuses him of trying to steal his crown, he said " If you discover I laid any plot together with the seen kill me, I say not only by your vote but my own." (Sophocles 136). This shows his understanding. Creon is comfortable with his power, people always greet Creon with respect, which demonstrates his power amongst the general population, for example, Creon said, “Now every man 's my pleasure; every man greets me." (Sophocles 136). Illustrates his relationship with the people of Thebes. Moreover, Creon is shown to be valuable towards the citizens of Thebes, when he said " I 'll go, you have not known me, but they have, and they have known my innocence." (Sophocles 140). This shows the trust citizens have towards Creon. Creon shows that he does not care for ruling Thebes, he states to Oedipus that "Now those who are your suiters fawn me, - success for them depends upon my favour. Why should I let all this go to win that?"(Sophocles 136). Creon eventually discovers that power is all he wants, leading towards King Oedipus ' exile. An example, is Creon said " Do not seek to be master in everything, for the things you mastered did not follow you throughout your life." (Sophocles 176), which explains that he manipulates with an intent that people mistake for honesty. Furthermore, this shows the end
Creon’s actions were movtivated by his attempts to rally the people behind his grand, extravant displays of power. An example of this was in his condemning of Antigone to death by imprisonment. Antigone openly flouted Thebes’ laws, making Creon’s worst fear almost a reality. Creon believed that without taking action he would be seen as a fradulent, powerless ruler. The people would want another Oedipus, a hero, not a lawmaker. He feared that tolerating lawlessness would show that : “[He, Creon] is not the man, not now: she is the man if this victory goes to her and she goes free” (83). This
Oedipus the King: Reason and Passion In the play, Oedipus the King, there are dual parts of reason and passion. Oedipus primarily acts with both reason and passion at different stages in the play. There are several points in the play where Oedipus acts with reason. The first such point occurs when he is asked by his followers to help save Thebes. He acts with reason when he immediately decides to heed to their demands and find help for them.
The ancient Greeks were fond believers of Fate. Fate, defined according to Webster’s, is “the principle or determining cause or will by which things in general are believed to come to be as they are or events to happen as the do.” The Greeks take on Fate was slightly modified. They believed that the gods determined Fate: “…fate, to which in a mysterious way the gods themselves were subject, was an impersonal force decreeing ultimate things only, and unconcerned with day by day affairs.” It was thought that these gods worked in subtle ways; this accounts for character flaws (called harmatia in Greek). Ancient Greeks thought the gods would alter a person’s character, in order for that person to suffer (or gain from) the appropriate outcome. Such was the case in Oedipus’s story.
The throne of the king of Thebes was passed from King Laius to Oedipus to Creon, making Creon a noble and royal figure. Being a part of the nobility is the first part of the requirement of being a tragic hero involving being a noble and having noble character. Along with having a noble title, Creon possesses the attribute of being noble and honorable. Putting aside Creon’s pride and selfishness for now, he still has the wellbeing and safety of his country, Thebes, at heart. Creon explain...
Oedipus’ anger causes him to kill the father he never knew and all the men in the entourage. Oedipus’ cannot control his temper and this personality flaw leads him to his fate. Another example of Oedipus’ presumptuous temperament is when he immediately assumes that Creon is trying to take his power from him. Creon sends Tiresias to Oedipus to help him solve the crime of the plague, and when Tiresias reveals that Oedipus must die in order to save the people of Thebes, Oedipus assumes Creon is trying to take his throne. Creon even tells Oedipus, “…if you think crude, mindless stubbornness such a gift, you’ve lost your sense of balance” (Meyer 1438).
Creon, who is Iocasta’s brother, claims in Oedipus the King that he does not wish to have the power and responsibility of being king. Towards the beginning of Oedipus the King, Oedipus has announced that Creon is to be banished from Thebes. Oedipus was exiling Creon because he said that Creon and Tiresias were trying to overthrow his power. Creon, being innocent of these accusations says that he has no desire to be king. He says, “Would any sane man prefer power, with al a king’s anxieties, To that same power and the grace of sleep? Certainly not I. I have never longed for the king’s power – only his rights.” (Oedipus, Scene II, L68-71) Oedipus, Creon, and Iocasta had the same amount of power in Thebes. The only difference was that Oedipus was the king. Creon said he was perfectly content with having the power without all the worries. Oedipus had the power but also had the people to worry about, Creon just had the power. By the end of Oedipus the King, it is revealed that Oedipus had killed the former King Laius and Iocasta is found dead. Creon decides to exile Oedipus, revealing that he may actually want to be king.
When Creon, brother in law of Oedipus accuses him of being a murder, Oedipus was really mad. He accuses Creon of betrayal and hypocrisy. In another speech, Oedipus accuses Creon for pointing him as guilty for the murder of Laius. We can see that when Oedipus says:
Creon does not learn a lesson from Oedipus' accusatory behavior. Instead he adapts this bad personality trait. Throughout Antigone, he accuses everyone who tries to give him advice of betraying him. Whereas, in Oedipus, he is falsely accused by Oedipus of trying to take over the throne. This paper will compare and contrast his behavior and evaluate if he learned anything from one play to the next.
In Oedipus the King (OK) , the audience is introduced to a Creon who seems to put loyalty to the king above all. He sympathizes with the tragic plight of King Oedipus and asserts no apparent ambition himself. His attitude toward the king is one of yielding and fulfilling reverence. Creon's notion of justice in OK stems directly from the divine. That which the gods have decreed must become law. It pains Creon to have Oedipus exiled, but he must do so as the gods have willed it. Creon's respect for divinity and prophecy seems to be his defining trait in OK. His attitude is one of unquestioning reverence.
Sophocles, following the Greek standard of tragedy, casts Creon as the tragic hero plagued by his own pride, inflexibility and power. Creon believes his authority to be twofold, both as the king and as the head of his family. He claims that the throne is the source of all power, saying ?whoever is chosen to govern should be obeyed ? must be obeyed, in all things, great and small, just and unjust? (Sophocles 217), and he demands the utmost allegiance from his son, bidding him to ?subordinate everything else?to [his] father?s will? (Sophocles 216). Creon is filled with hubris, and he rejects any solution that might compromise his image. For instance, when the guards escort Antigone to the palace, he demands of the Choragos, ?Who is the man...
Sleeping with your mother, killing your father, watching your only son commit suicide, and gouging your own eyes out are only a few results of Oedipus and Creon’s flaws. In the books Oedipus The King and Antigone, written by Sophocles, the characters Creon and Oedipus meet horrific fates. During Oedipus The King, Oedipus becomes the king of Thebes but is ignorant to the fact that he is the son of Laius and Jocasta. In Antigone, Creon refuses to bury the former king Polyneices because he attacked Thebes. During these books Oedipus and Creon’s flaws result in the destruction of their lives.
Here is a story where Oedipus the King, who has accomplished great things in his life, discovers that the gods were only playing with him. He has everything a man of that time could want; he is king of Thebes, he has a wonderful wife and children, and great fame through out the lands. He has lived a good life, but in the end everything is taken from him.
Oedipus loses all trust for Creon and thinks that he is plotting to kill him and steal the thrown. This, however, is not true at all. Creon even says that he would rather not be king. He is equal in all decision making with Oedipus and Jocasta. So why would he want the extra hassle of actually having to be the king. Oedipus doesn’t listen and wants to have Creon banished or killed.