Oath Of Horatii Analysis

577 Words2 Pages

The Oath of the Horatii was originally painted for the King Louis XVI for his subjects to get the message that they should accept personal sacrifice of oneself in the service of him and one’s nation. The artwork is relating back to the story of the three Horatii brothers who made a vow to their father to fight for Rome, helping support the message King Louis XVI is trying to portray about vowing to him and performing civic duty. Five years after it was commissioned, The Oath of the Horatii was used by revolutionist leaders to overthrow King Louis XVI, the one the painting was originally commissioned for. The revolutionist leaders used the painting to also promote civic duty but towards the nation only. Virtue was defined by ancient Romans as laying down one’s life for one’s country, however; King Louis XVI changed the value …show more content…

The revolutionists believed in patriotism and felt that people should lay down their life towards one’s nation and pledge loyalty to the nation instead of the kings who would eat luxurious food bought with the citizens money gained from taxes as well as start a war with other countries that cost the people their lives and more of their money while keeping claim to the throne. When first viewing The Oath of the Horatii, the three men on the left-hand side of the painting seemed to be demanding the swords from the older man. The older man in the middle of the painting seemed to be trying to hand the three demanding men the swords in his hands, but he also seemed to be pleading to his God to make the younger men see that he was innocent. The women on the far right-side of the painting seemed very distraught with the conflict brewing between the three young men and the older man as they were shown to be weeping and consoling each other as

Open Document