Nicholas Of Causa Rhetorical Analysis

2371 Words5 Pages

Nicholas of Cusa served as diplomat and Cardinal to the Catholic Church. He was heavily involved in trying to reunite the Western and Eastern churches by settling differences between them (Meuthen, 54).1 In order to reunify them through negotiations, Nicholas of Cusa went to Constantinople before the conquest of Ottoman Sultan Mehmet II. While in Constantinople, he gained knowledge of Islam and the Latin translations he studied helped him to express his theological reflections on the fall of Constantinople.
De Pace Fidei can be used as a template for interreligious dialogue as it is comprised of debates of eighteen different cults. Of these cults, all of them are ritually descended from the Abrahamic religions of Judaism, Christianity, …show more content…

When the many rites are seen as a sign of truth of faith, the rites will stop causing chaos amongst religions. The Tartar who was fascinated by Paul’s speech, thought it impossible for him to bring the Tartars “as uneducated persons”, to the truth of Christianity and have them believe in Jesus as the only true way to obtain happiness. Paul states that the Muslims and Christians are aware of this …show more content…

This is one eschatological view of harmony within multiple religions. Yet, the diversity is not conquered until God is able to tell the truth during the final judgment. This is caused by a variety meant to instruct mankind on how to act with faith and how to believe. The Muslims are also influenced by Nicholas of Cusa to say that one faith is possible to be found within a variety of laws and rituals that were previously given by God’s prophets to be shared to the many nations regardless of whether it is seen as hidden guidance which will be unhidden by God on Judgment Day. However, until this Day of Judgment, diversity will remain to serve as an enticement to do morally good

More about Nicholas Of Causa Rhetorical Analysis

Open Document