Nelson Mandela Rhetorical Questions

1553 Words4 Pages

The art of constructing a sophisticated, well-written piece of work is a feat of it’s own. Proceeding to take that piece and orally presenting it to a audience is on a whole new level. One who excels at this has to be multifaceted with strengths in many areas. Mandela is a prime example of an individual who encompasses the qualities of a brilliant speechwriter and also a speaker in front of the masses. Mandela rallied an entire nation, that was predominantly separated due to the apartheid laws present at the time, using only his voice, spirit, and unwavering determination. After analyzing Mandela’s speech “I am prepared to die”, evidence of ethos, logos, pathos, and rhetorical questions showcases Mandela’s ability as a very established writer and presenter of speeches. …show more content…

The following two created extra impact upon deliverance. "Who will deny that thirty years of my life have been spent knocking in vain, patiently, moderately, and modestly at a closed and barred door?” (Nelson Mandela Foundation) and “What have been the fruits of moderation?” (Nelson Mandela Foundation). The similarity between these questions is that they both cannot be answered. Mandela takes advantage of this fact by ending several of his main points with one of these questions as it closes the topic in a very firm and powerful way. Mandela mastered the placement of these questions to ensure undivided attention from the audience. Another device used by Mandela very frequently throughout the speech was negative connotation directed to the government of South Africa. This also ties in with repetition, another tool he used. One particular phrase which was both repeated heavily and characteristic of the negative connotation was “government violence” (Nelson Mandela Foundation). This was a doubled up phrase as he was both trying to prove his innocence in the matter yet also voicing the frustrations that many South Africans felt at the

Open Document