Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of the Victorian era literature
The impact of the Victorian era literature
Analysis of story of an hour
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The impact of the Victorian era literature
“Story of an Hour” by Kate Chopin was set in the Victorian Era and told the story of a woman who, in one hour, faced the lows and highs and lows of life. In the beginning, Mrs. Mallard was gently informed by her sister and a friend, that her husband was killed in a train accident, and she was devastated. The author wrote, “She wept at once, with sudden, wild abandonment, in her sister’s arms.” So we can clearly see that the news of his death truly upset her. After Mrs. Mallard went alone to her room and sat staring out the window, a feeling of freedom started to come over her, and she realized that it was not completely bad that her husband was dead. The texts says, “But she saw beyond that bitter moment a long procession of years to come that …show more content…
Mallard. One character trait that Mrs. Mallard had was gladness. This is indirect characterization and was identified in her thoughts. She was glad because the author wrote, “... she suddenly recognized as the strongest impulse of her being!” This shows that she was relieved and happy that she was able to be free. Another trait Mrs. Mallard had was bossiness. This character trait was a part of her speech that the author revealed indirectly. Mrs. Mallard was generally a bossy person because the text says, “ ‘Go away. I am not making myself ill.’” This is when she was telling her sister to leave her alone and shows that she is a bossy person. Kate Chopin indirectly revealed that Mrs. Mallard was a lonely person through her actions. This is accurate because the story says, “... she went away to her room alone. She would have no one follow her.” This shows that when her husband died, she felt extremely lonely, but she also could have felt that way even when Brently Mallard was around because it says, “And yet she had loved him -- sometimes,” proving that she also felt lonely when Brently was around. All in all, Kate Chopin showed that Mrs. Mallard had many character traits through her thoughts, speech, actions, looks, and relationships she
Mrs. Mallard's confusion begins by her first feeling "sudden, wild abandonment, " but then a short while after begins to have strange feelings of relief.
Mrs. Mallard?s freedom did not last but a few moments. Her reaction to the news of the death of her husband was not the way most people would have reacted. We do not know much about Mr. And Mrs. Mallards relationship. We gather from the text that her freedom must have been limited in some way for her to be feeling this way. Years ago women were expected to act a certain way and not to deviate from that. Mrs. Mallard could have been very young when she and Brently were married. She may not have had the opportunity to see the world through a liberated woman?s eyes and she thought now was her chance.
“The Story of an Hour” written by Kate Chopin, published in 1894, tells a story of a woman who believes she will now experience freedom from her repressive marriage. Chopin records the rollercoaster of emotions Mrs. Mallard felt after learning of her husband’s death. Mrs. Mallard experiences strong emotions but not of grief or despre but rather freedom and joy. After the death of her husband she realizes the limitless potential of her own self-assertion. In the story, the reader sees the common view of marriage in the late nineteenth hundreds. Mrs. Mallard felt free from a redistricting and sheltering marriage and becomes self possessed. Later, when Mrs. Mallard learns that her husband still lives, she know that all hope of freedom is gone. With the use of symbolism and characterization, Chopin creates the under lining theme
Mrs. Mallard is the example of a typical housewife of the mid 1800’s. At the time, most women were not allowed to go to school and were usually anticipated to marry and do housework. During that time, the only way women could get out of a marriage was if they were to die or their husbands was to die. In that time period, the husband had control of all of the money, so it would not be wise if the wife were to leave the financial freedom that was provided by the husband. This is most likely why Mrs. Mallard never leaves her husband’s death, she is sad at first but then experiences an overwhelming sense of joy. This shows that she is not in a fulfilling marriage as his death means she will finally have own individual freedom, as well as financial freedom being the grieving widow who will inherit her husband’s wealth. In the words of Lawrence I. Berkove he states, “On the other hand, Chopin did not regard marriage as a state of pure and unbroken bliss, but on the other, she could not intelligently believe that it was desirable, healthy, or even possible for anyone to live as Louise, in the grip of her feverish delusion, wishes: to be absolutely free and to live totally and solely for oneself.” (3) Mrs. Mallard’s reaction to her husband’s death is Chopin’s way of expressin...
with her husband?s death and now felt she had room to exist freely. This is supported by the lines?she would live for herself now. There would be no powerful will bending her in the blind. This demonstrates to the reader that she felt controlled by her husband, and that she would no longer be tied down to the ways of the time, which were men controlling women. This was also supported by Jennifer Hicks in her overview of the story which states, "Later, when we see Mrs. Mallard "warm and relaxed", we realize that problem with her heart is that her marriage has not allowed her to "live for herself"."
The story begins on a very sad note especially in the eyes of a reader. Mrs. Mallard is said to have a “heart
Chopin reflects her rejection of the “postures of femininity” through her character’s descriptions. She describes her as “young, with a fair, calm face, whose lines bespoke repression.” Describing her as young and calm are what men looked for in a wife in the 19th century. They wanted a submissive woman to tend to their needs as Chopin’s description suggests. Furthermore, Chopin says of her character Mrs. Mallard, “she would live for herself.” Her character believes she will now be free of her marriage, and won’t be “repressed” as aforementioned any longer by her husband. Wives had a natural servitude towards their husbands as husbands worked and went about their lives. All in all, Chopin displays her character as having a joyous moment after the death of her husband because she is let go of being forced into her “femininity.”
Mallard gets the news she goes into her room to have some alone time. She’s in there for awhile so her sister goes and check on her but Mrs. Mallard locked the door, her sister was worried about her and thought she was making herself ill but Mrs. Mallard replies to her sister and says “Go away. I am not making myself ill.” (16) At this moment Mrs. Mallard was actually happy about her husband’s death the evidence that supports it is after she tells her sister she’s not making herself ill, “
...Mallard’s death up to the reader’s own interpretation, but it seems that she is trying to secretly prove that women do not have to be dependent upon men. Chopin demonstrates throughout the literary work that women can possess joy without having a man by their side, which contradicts the beliefs of the 1800’s society. Chopin’s use of an ambiguous death and irony successfully create an entertaining story that courageously takes a stand for women’s freedom.
Mallard states that she is going to live her new life independently now that Mr. Mallard is gone; she accepts her newfound freedom and believes that she is now an independent woman. Mrs. Mallard was oppressed by Mr. Mallard, and Chopin hints at this oppression: “Chopin seems to be making a comment on nineteenth-century marriages, which granted one person - the man - right to own and dominate another - the woman,” (“The Story of an Hour” 266). The men and women should be treated equally in marriage and should be free, which relates to Mrs. Mallard feeling oppressed by Mr. Mallard. She realizes that she was below her husband her whole married life: “What could love, the unsolved mystery, count for in the face of this possession of self-assertion which she suddenly recognized as the strongest impulse of her being!” (Chopin 645). Her inferiority to her husband controlled her; his death allows her to start over as an independent being. Mrs. Mallard is known to have heart trouble, but readers do not understand what that trouble is until they soon find out: “Later, when we see Mrs. Mallard ‘warmed and relaxed,’ we realize that the problem with her heart is that her marriage has not allowed her to ‘live for herself,’” (Hicks 269). The readers find out that Mrs. Mallard’s mystery heart trouble dealt with her being confined by Mr. Mallard in marriage, which she soon turns away from. Mrs. Mallard’s internal struggle is caused by rushing into marriage; she did not develop herself before developing a relationship with someone else, such as Mr. Mallard: “Love is not a substitute for selfhood; indeed selfhood is love’s pre-condition,” (Ewell 273). Mrs. Mallard may have felt constrained by Mr. Mallard in her marriage because she did not know herself before. If she had known herself before the marriage, she would have known her own constraints and opinions, instead of feeling oppressed by Mr. Mallard. Mrs. Mallard accepts her freedom and independence. She decides to live
Mallard’s emotions over the presumed death of her husband. The author used both dramatic and situational irony to mislead the reader and surprise them with a plot twist ending. By utilizing both external and internal conflict the author expresses the internal debate of Mrs. Mallard’s true feelings and those of the people around her. The author used symbolism to display Mrs. Mallard’s desire for freedom from her marriage. In the end it was not joy that killed Mrs. Mallard but the realization that she lost her
Mrs. Mallard is described as being young and having "a fair, calm face" symbolizing the beauty and innocence of a child. Brently Mallard had repressed her, and now through this seemingly tragic event she is freed of his rule over her and she is able to go on with her life.
Mallard? We know from the beginning that she is "afflicted with a heart trouble" (1). She's unwell, with a genteel condition, which means she can still act like and be treated like a lady. We can tell from the description of her "two white slender hands" (10) that she doesn't work, or engage in manual labor. It seems like all the people in her life are looking out for her and trying to take care of her, at least during the hour in which we get to know
She has defied her husband, instead of being better, she is now worse. In “Story of an Hour” Mrs. Mallard now truly believes her husband is gone, “There was a feverish triumph in her eyes, and she carried herself unwittingly like a goddess of Victory” (“Story of an Hour”). She is happy at last. Through these characters, actions we can see their feminist side. They all had tragic endings; two died and one went insane all because of their oppression.
The first reader has a guided perspective of the text that one would expect from a person who has never studied the short story; however the reader makes some valid points which enhance what is thought to be a guided knowledge of the text. The author describes Mrs. Mallard as a woman who seems to be the "victim" of an overbearing but occasionally loving husband. Being told of her husband's death, "She did not hear the story as many women have heard the same, with a paralyzed inability to accept its significance." (This shows that she is not totally locked into marriage as most women in her time). Although "she had loved him--sometimes," she automatically does not want to accept, blindly, the situation of being controlled by her husband. The reader identified Mrs. Mallard as not being a "one-dimensional, clone-like woman having a predictable, adequate emotional response for every life condition." In fact the reader believed that Mrs. Mallard had the exact opposite response to the death her husband because finally, she recognizes the freedom she has desired for a long time and it overcomes her sorrow. "Free! Body and soul free! She kept whispering." We can see that the reader got this idea form this particular phrase in the story because it illuminates the idea of her sorrow tuning to happiness.