Mr Birling Analysis

1580 Words4 Pages

Meant to React to It? In 1912, Great Britain was the place to be. With a mighty empire spanning the globe, Great Britain was the richest, the most technological, and the most powerful country on the planet. For everyone fortunate enough to be British, it was the perfect time to be alive. Or was it? This is the view that JB Priestley challenges through his play Inspector Calls. Capitalist Mr Birling and his family, who believe in a few years they will be living in a Utopian world, “that’ll have forgotten all these Capital versus Labour agitations and silly little war scares” and that “There’ll be peace and prosperity and rapid progress everywhere (except for Russia who will always be behind naturally)” is confronted by the Inspector who shows the Birlings the grim, alarming truth hidden underneath their luxurious, ignorant lifestyles. As the audience knows, Mr Birling’s prediction of “peace and prosperity and rapid progress” could not contradict further the reality of the 40 years following 1912. These “silly little war scares” Mr Birling …show more content…

In 1912, women still didn’t have the right to vote (this would come four years later). This was merely one of the inequalities women had in society at this time. Another inequality between genders was their wages. Even in 2015, men, on average, earn around 9.4% more than women. This is nothing however compared to the gap in 1912. The reason Mr Birling’s factories didn’t have any men working their, just “girls”, was because it was a huge amount cheaper to employ women. Women worked at rates so low, they could barely feed themselves let alone a family. Eva was one of these “girls” and because she needed more money, she decided to ask for more. Mr Birling “refused, of course”. This shows to the audience that in 1912 British society, there wasn’t just a class gap in equality, but a gender gap as

Open Document